Skip to content

The Superconformal Algebra and NS/R Sectors

The same local superconformal OPEs describe two different state spaces. Neveu–Schwarz fermions have half-integer oscillator frequencies; Ramond fermions have integer frequencies and Clifford zero modes. Understanding how these sectors share one algebra requires distinguishing three quantities: a conformal weight on the plane, an energy on the cylinder, and a physical string intercept.

This page develops that distinction from the current OPEs through oscillator representations and explicit states. We use the shared canonical fermions and arbitrary α′\alpha', together with the ordering prescriptions in the overview. The previous page derives the currents and their Wick contractions. Here G(z)G(z) denotes the supercurrent also called TF(z)T_F(z).

We first discuss one holomorphic matter sector. A closed string has an antiholomorphic copy; an open string with reflecting boundary conditions can be described by one doubled chiral theory. A superconformal representation is not yet a physical string spectrum: the constraints, ghosts, and choice of projection on states still have to be included.

The local input is

T(z)T(w)∼c/2(z−w)4+2T(w)(z−w)2+∂T(w)z−w,T(z)G(w)∼3G(w)/2(z−w)2+∂G(w)z−w,G(z)G(w)∼2c/3(z−w)3+2T(w)z−w.\begin{aligned} T(z)T(w)&\sim \frac{c/2}{(z-w)^4} +\frac{2T(w)}{(z-w)^2} +\frac{\partial T(w)}{z-w},\\ T(z)G(w)&\sim \frac{3G(w)/2}{(z-w)^2} +\frac{\partial G(w)}{z-w},\\ G(z)G(w)&\sim \frac{2c/3}{(z-w)^3} +\frac{2T(w)}{z-w}. \end{aligned}

For DD free coordinate multiplets, consisting of one boson and one Majorana fermion per coordinate,

c=cX+cψ=D+D2=3D2.c=c_X+c_\psi=D+\frac D2=\frac{3D}{2}.

The alternative notation c^=2c/3\widehat c=2c/3 then gives c^=D\widehat c=D. The formulas below use cc, the ordinary Virasoro central charge.

The Laurent expansions and their inverse contour integrals are

T(z)=∑n∈ZLnz−n−2,Ln=∮dz2πizn+1T(z),G(z)=∑rGrz−r−3/2,Gr=∮dz2πizr+1/2G(z).\begin{aligned} T(z)&=\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}L_nz^{-n-2}, &L_n&=\oint\frac{dz}{2\pi i}z^{n+1}T(z),\\ G(z)&=\sum_rG_rz^{-r-3/2}, &G_r&=\oint\frac{dz}{2\pi i}z^{r+1/2}G(z). \end{aligned}

Contours are counterclockwise. Products of odd currents lead to anticommutators. The allowed lattice of rr depends on the sector, but the contour calculation itself is local.

For example, the cubic pole in GGGG contributes to the inner contour

∮wdz2πi zr+1/22c/3(z−w)3=c3∂w2wr+1/2=c3(r2−14)wr−3/2.\begin{aligned} \oint_w\frac{dz}{2\pi i}\, z^{r+1/2}\frac{2c/3}{(z-w)^3} &=\frac c3\partial_w^2w^{r+1/2}\\ &=\frac c3\left(r^2-\frac14\right)w^{r-3/2}. \end{aligned}

The outer contour multiplies by ws+1/2w^{s+1/2} and gives δr+s,0\delta_{r+s,0}. The simple pole gives 2Lr+s2L_{r+s}. This explains both the central term and its otherwise unexpected subtraction 1/41/4.

In the TGTG calculation, the double pole contributes 32(m+1)\tfrac32(m+1), while integrating the simple-pole derivative by parts contributes −(m+r+32)-(m+r+\tfrac32). Their sum is m/2−rm/2-r. The fourth-order pole in TTTT similarly gives (c/2)∂w3wm+1/3!=c m(m2−1)wm−2/12(c/2)\partial_w^3w^{m+1}/3!=c\,m(m^2-1)w^{m-2}/12. Together,

[Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+c12m(m2−1)δm+n,0,[Lm,Gr]=(m2−r)Gm+r,{Gr,Gs}=2Lr+s+c3(r2−14)δr+s,0.\begin{aligned} [L_m,L_n] &=(m-n)L_{m+n} +\frac c{12}m(m^2-1)\delta_{m+n,0},\\ [L_m,G_r] &=\left(\frac m2-r\right)G_{m+r},\\ \{G_r,G_s\} &=2L_{r+s} +\frac c3\left(r^2-\frac14\right)\delta_{r+s,0}. \end{aligned}

This is the plane N=1\mathcal N=1 super-Virasoro algebra. The central terms follow from short-distance singularities; they do not disappear because the underlying matter fields are free.

Spin structure determines the oscillator lattice

Section titled “Spin structure determines the oscillator lattice”

On the cylinder w=τE+iσw=\tau_E+i\sigma, with σ∼σ+2π\sigma\sim\sigma+2\pi, the two spin structures are

ψcyl(w+2πi)={−ψcyl(w),NS,+ψcyl(w),R.\psi_{\rm cyl}(w+2\pi i)= \begin{cases} -\psi_{\rm cyl}(w),&\mathrm{NS},\\ +\psi_{\rm cyl}(w),&\mathrm{R}. \end{cases}

A mode e−rwe^{-rw} gains the phase e−2πire^{-2\pi ir}. Hence r∈Z+12r\in\mathbb Z+\tfrac12 in the Neveu–Schwarz sector and r∈Zr\in\mathbb Z in the Ramond sector. These are the sectors originating in the constructions of Neveu and Schwarz and Ramond.

The bosonic derivative is periodic and has integer modes. The coordinate XX itself is periodic for a noncompact target coordinate with no winding; a compact coordinate may instead shift by its winding period around the spatial circle. This does not change the integer moding of ∂X\partial X.

Under z=ewz=e^w, a weight-1/21/2 fermion transforms as

ψcyl(w)=z1/2ψ(z).\psi_{\rm cyl}(w)=z^{1/2}\psi(z).

The Jacobian changes sign after one turn. Thus cylinder antiperiodicity in NS becomes single-valuedness on the plane, whereas cylinder periodicity in R becomes a sign change around a Ramond insertion. The location of a drawn branch cut is a choice; the monodromy around its endpoint is the physical information.

NS half-integer and Ramond integer mode lattices, including their cylinder signs and plane monodromies

NS modes lie halfway between the integers and have no zero mode. R modes include zero, where the fermions act on a spinor ground-state space. The square-root Jacobian in z=ewz=e^w reverses the cylinder sign when expressed in the plane spin frame. The lattice spacing is one in the dimensionless frequency rr; the diagram does not represent spacetime energy levels.

The fields have expansions

∂Xμ(z)=−iα′2∑n∈Zαnμz−n−1,ψμ(z)=∑r∈Z+νψrμz−r−1/2,ν={12,NS,0,R.\begin{aligned} \partial X^\mu(z) &=-i\sqrt{\frac{\alpha'}2} \sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}\alpha_n^\mu z^{-n-1},\\ \psi^\mu(z) &=\sum_{r\in\mathbb Z+\nu}\psi_r^\mu z^{-r-1/2}, \qquad \nu=\begin{cases}\tfrac12,&\mathrm{NS},\\0,&\mathrm{R}.\end{cases} \end{aligned}

Their OPEs imply

[αmμ,αnν]=mημνδm+n,0,{ψrμ,ψsν}=ημνδr+s,0.[\alpha_m^\mu,\alpha_n^\nu] =m\eta^{\mu\nu}\delta_{m+n,0}, \qquad \{\psi_r^\mu,\psi_s^\nu\} =\eta^{\mu\nu}\delta_{r+s,0}.

For instance, the two fermion contours leave the integral ημν∮dw wr+s−1/(2πi)\eta^{\mu\nu}\oint dw\,w^{r+s-1}/(2\pi i). The canonical normalization of ψ\psi is what makes its coefficient one. Bosonic and fermionic oscillators commute with each other.

A sector Fock ground state is annihilated by αn\alpha_n and ψr\psi_r for positive n,rn,r. Negative modes create excitations. The zero modes are different: α0\alpha_0 records momentum, while ψ0\psi_0 exists only in R and acts within a degenerate ground-state space.

Substituting the field expansions into the shared current G=i2/α′:ψ⋅∂X:G=i\sqrt{2/\alpha'}:\psi\cdot\partial X: makes the two square-root coefficients cancel:

Gr=∑n∈Zαn⋅ψr−n.G_r=\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}\alpha_n\cdot\psi_{r-n}.

There is no mixed boson–fermion contraction to subtract here. In the stress tensor, the bosonic contribution is the usual quadratic oscillator expression. Differentiating z−s−1/2z^{-s-1/2} in the fermionic contribution first gives a coefficient (s+1/2)/2(s+1/2)/2. Antisymmetrizing the two fermions at fixed r+s=mr+s=m replaces it by (s−r)/4(s-r)/4. The coefficient symmetric under their exchange drops out.

To make the finite vacuum term explicit, write :⋯:osc:\cdots:_{\rm osc} for ordering with positive-frequency annihilation operators to the right in the chosen sector. Ramond zero modes remain Clifford operators; they are not assigned to the annihilation modes. This is not the unmarked local plane OPE ordering. Define the oscillator bilinear

Lmosc=12∑n∈Z:αm−n⋅αn:osc+12∑r∈Z+ν(r+m2):ψ−r⋅ψm+r:osc.\begin{aligned} L_m^{\rm osc} ={}&\frac12\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z} :\alpha_{m-n}\cdot\alpha_n:_{\rm osc}\\ &+\frac12\sum_{r\in\mathbb Z+\nu} \left(r+\frac m2\right) :\psi_{-r}\cdot\psi_{m+r}:_{\rm osc}. \end{aligned}

This is a convenient representation of the operator, but it is not yet the plane generator in every sector. The relation is

Lm=Lmosc+hvac(ν)δm,0,hvac(ν)={0,NS,D/16,R.L_m=L_m^{\rm osc}+h_{\rm vac}^{(\nu)}\delta_{m,0}, \qquad h_{\rm vac}^{(\nu)} =\begin{cases} 0,&\mathrm{NS},\\ D/16,&\mathrm{R}. \end{cases}

The Ramond value will be derived below. It is required by plane point splitting and by the plane super-Virasoro algebra. Calling the bilinear alone the plane LmL_m would silently lose that finite term.

Let qμq^\mu denote the dimensionless eigenvalue of α0μ\alpha_0^\mu. For a closed string in a noncompact direction, qμ=α′/2 pμq^\mu=\sqrt{\alpha'/2}\,p^\mu. The doubled open-string convention instead gives α0μ=2α′ pμ\alpha_0^\mu=\sqrt{2\alpha'}\,p^\mu. These are the zero-mode factors already encountered in the bosonic theory; the oscillator formulas do not require a new choice of α′\alpha'.

At m=0m=0, combining positive and negative frequencies gives

L0=12q2+N+hvac(ν),N=∑n=1∞α−n⋅αn+∑r>0r ψ−r⋅ψr.\begin{aligned} L_0&=\frac12q^2+N+h_{\rm vac}^{(\nu)},\\ N&=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\alpha_{-n}\cdot\alpha_n +\sum_{r>0}r\,\psi_{-r}\cdot\psi_r. \end{aligned}

For example, a bosonic oscillator α−n\alpha_{-n} raises L0L_0 by nn, and a fermionic oscillator ψ−r\psi_{-r} raises it by rr. The factor of nn in the bosonic number is already contained in [αn,α−n]=n[\alpha_n,\alpha_{-n}]=n.

The occupation levels above either vacuum are nonnegative. This does not make the covariant matter inner product positive: a timelike oscillator can have negative norm. Representation-theoretic positivity statements below will be restricted explicitly to unitary Hilbert spaces. The covariant construction and its normal ordering are also developed in Weigand’s lectures, sections 6.3–6.4.

The cylinder shift changes the central polynomials

Section titled “The cylinder shift changes the central polynomials”

The fermion and supercurrent are primary fields of weights 1/21/2 and 3/23/2. The stress tensor has an anomalous transformation law because its OPE with itself has a fourth-order pole:

Tcyl(w)=(dzdw)2T(z)+c12{z,w},{z,w}=z′′′z′−32(z′′z′)2.T_{\rm cyl}(w) =\left(\frac{dz}{dw}\right)^2T(z) +\frac c{12}\{z,w\}, \qquad \{z,w\}=\frac{z'''}{z'}-\frac32\left(\frac{z''}{z'}\right)^2.

For z=ewz=e^w, all ratios in the Schwarzian are one, so {z,w}=−1/2\{z,w\}=-1/2. It follows that

Tcyl(w)=z2T(z)−c24,Gcyl(w)=z3/2G(z).T_{\rm cyl}(w)=z^2T(z)-\frac c{24}, \qquad G_{\rm cyl}(w)=z^{3/2}G(z).

Expanding in cylinder Fourier modes defines the energy generators

Tcyl(w)=∑nLne−nw,Ln=Ln−c24δn,0.T_{\rm cyl}(w)=\sum_n\mathcal L_ne^{-nw}, \qquad \mathcal L_n=L_n-\frac c{24}\delta_{n,0}.

The supercurrent has the same coefficients GrG_r on plane and cylinder. Only the bosonic zero mode shifts.

Substitute Ln=Ln+cδn,0/24L_n=\mathcal L_n+c\delta_{n,0}/24 into the plane algebra. In the Virasoro commutator, the linear-in-mm term from the zero-mode shift cancels the −m-m in m3−mm^3-m. In the odd anticommutator, it cancels the constant −1/4-1/4. Therefore

[Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+c12m3δm+n,0,[Lm,Gr]=(m2−r)Gm+r,{Gr,Gs}=2Lr+s+c3r2δr+s,0.\begin{aligned} [\mathcal L_m,\mathcal L_n] &=(m-n)\mathcal L_{m+n} +\frac c{12}m^3\delta_{m+n,0},\\ [\mathcal L_m,G_r] &=\left(\frac m2-r\right)G_{m+r},\\ \{G_r,G_s\} &=2\mathcal L_{r+s}+\frac c3r^2\delta_{r+s,0}. \end{aligned}

These are the same operators written with a different energy origin. In particular,

G02=L0−c24=L0in the Ramond sector.G_0^2=L_0-\frac c{24}=\mathcal L_0 \qquad\text{in the Ramond sector}.

The cylinder and plane formulas must not be mixed. The central polynomials differ precisely because the stress tensor is not a primary field.

An NS superconformal primary state ∣h⟩\lvert h\rangle obeys

L0∣h⟩=h∣h⟩,Ln∣h⟩=0(n>0),Gr∣h⟩=0(r>0).L_0\lvert h\rangle=h\lvert h\rangle, \qquad L_n\lvert h\rangle=0\quad(n>0), \qquad G_r\lvert h\rangle=0\quad(r>0).

Negative modes raise the weight because [L0,Ln]=−nLn[L_0,L_n]=-nL_n and [L0,Gr]=−rGr[L_0,G_r]=-rG_r. In particular, the first possible superpartner is

∣h+12⟩desc=G−1/2∣h⟩,\lvert h+\tfrac12\rangle_{\rm desc} =G_{-1/2}\lvert h\rangle,

when this vector is nonzero. Since G−1/22=L−1G_{-1/2}^2=L_{-1}, applying this odd mode twice gives a translation descendant.

The partner is a Virasoro primary:

LnG−1/2∣h⟩=(n2+12)Gn−1/2∣h⟩=0(n>0).L_nG_{-1/2}\lvert h\rangle =\left(\frac n2+\frac12\right)G_{n-1/2}\lvert h\rangle=0 \qquad(n>0).

It is generally not a superconformal primary, since

G1/2G−1/2∣h⟩=2h∣h⟩.G_{1/2}G_{-1/2}\lvert h\rangle=2h\lvert h\rangle.

For Ln†=L−nL_n^\dagger=L_{-n} and Gr†=G−rG_r^\dagger=G_{-r}, its norm is

∥G−1/2∣h⟩∥2=2h ∥∣h⟩∥2.\|G_{-1/2}\lvert h\rangle\|^2 =2h\,\|\lvert h\rangle\|^2.

A positive-norm unitary representation therefore has h≥0h\geq0; at h=0h=0 the partner is removed as a null vector. The covariant Lorentzian matter Fock space is not such a unitary space before the string constraints are imposed.

The NS Fock state ∣q⟩\lvert q\rangle with no nonzero oscillators is a superconformal primary of weight q2/2q^2/2. Using the oscillator expression for GG,

G−1/2∣q⟩=q⋅ψ−1/2∣q⟩,G−1/22∣q⟩=q⋅α−1∣q⟩=L−1∣q⟩.G_{-1/2}\lvert q\rangle =q\cdot\psi_{-1/2}\lvert q\rangle, \qquad G_{-1/2}^2\lvert q\rangle =q\cdot\alpha_{-1}\lvert q\rangle =L_{-1}\lvert q\rangle.

At zero momentum the first vector vanishes. For another useful example, take ∣ζ;q⟩=ζ⋅ψ−1/2∣q⟩\lvert\zeta;q\rangle=\zeta\cdot\psi_{-1/2}\lvert q\rangle. Then

G1/2∣ζ;q⟩=(q⋅ζ)∣q⟩.G_{1/2}\lvert\zeta;q\rangle =(q\cdot\zeta)\lvert q\rangle.

All higher positive supercurrent modes annihilate this one-oscillator state. Thus q⋅ζ=0q\cdot\zeta=0 makes it a superconformal primary, of weight q2/2+1/2q^2/2+1/2. This is an algebraic transversality condition; the complete physical-state and mass-shell conditions are still needed to interpret the state as a spacetime particle.

Why the identity vacuum is globally invariant

Section titled “Why the identity vacuum is globally invariant”

For the identity state ∣0⟩NS\lvert0\rangle_{\rm NS}, regularity at the origin gives stronger conditions than highest weight:

Ln∣0⟩NS=0(n≥−1),Gr∣0⟩NS=0(r≥−12).L_n\lvert0\rangle_{\rm NS}=0\quad(n\geq-1), \qquad G_r\lvert0\rangle_{\rm NS}=0\quad(r\geq-\tfrac12).

Indeed, a nonzero term with n≥−1n\geq-1 in T(z)∣0⟩T(z)\lvert0\rangle or with r≥−1/2r\geq-1/2 in G(z)∣0⟩G(z)\lvert0\rangle would create a pole at a point with no operator insertion.

The five generators L−1,L0,L1,G−1/2,G1/2L_{-1},L_0,L_1,G_{-1/2},G_{1/2} close without a central term. They form the global osp(1∣2)\mathfrak{osp}(1|2) algebra, and the identity vacuum is invariant under all five. This regularity argument does not require a positivity assumption for each covariant matter state.

On the cylinder the same vacuum has L0=−c/24\mathcal L_0=-c/24. This negative Casimir energy does not violate NS unitarity: the NS bound concerns plane h=L0h=L_0, and there is no NS mode G0G_0 whose square would equal L0\mathcal L_0.

Ramond zero modes and the free ground-state weight

Section titled “Ramond zero modes and the free ground-state weight”

A Ramond highest-weight space is annihilated by Ln>0L_{n>0} and Gn>0G_{n>0}, but it carries an action of G0G_0. In the free theory the fermionic zero modes obey

{ψ0μ,ψ0ν}=ημν,Γμ=2 ψ0μ,{Γμ,Γν}=2ημν.\{\psi_0^\mu,\psi_0^\nu\}=\eta^{\mu\nu}, \qquad \Gamma^\mu=\sqrt2\,\psi_0^\mu, \qquad \{\Gamma^\mu,\Gamma^\nu\}=2\eta^{\mu\nu}.

Thus zero modes act as gamma matrices on a spinor ground-state space. They are not DD independent creation operators. In even DD, an irreducible complex representation of the full Clifford algebra has 2D/22^{D/2} components. In ten dimensions this is a 32-component Dirac space, which splits into two 16-component Weyl spaces under the Lorentz generators. Reality conditions, the physical constraints, and the GSO choice must still be applied before counting physical superstring polarizations.

On a Fock ground state ∣q,u⟩R\lvert q,u\rangle_{\rm R}, labeled by a spinor uu, all nonzero modes in G0G_0 annihilate the state. Therefore

G0∣q,u⟩R=(q⋅ψ0)∣q,u⟩R,(q⋅ψ0)2=12q2.G_0\lvert q,u\rangle_{\rm R} =(q\cdot\psi_0)\lvert q,u\rangle_{\rm R}, \qquad (q\cdot\psi_0)^2=\frac12q^2.

Comparing this with G02=L0−c/24G_0^2=L_0-c/24 fixes

L0∣q,u⟩R=(12q2+c24)∣q,u⟩R.L_0\lvert q,u\rangle_{\rm R} =\left(\frac12q^2+\frac c{24}\right)\lvert q,u\rangle_{\rm R}.

For the free coordinate multiplets, c/24=D/16c/24=D/16. At zero momentum this derives the constant in the plane oscillator formula.

The same constant can be found without using the supercurrent algebra. For one real fermion, the symmetric Ramond ground-state contraction on the plane is

KR(z,w)=z+w2zw(z−w),∣z∣>∣w∣.K_{\rm R}(z,w) =\frac{z+w}{2\sqrt{zw}(z-w)}, \qquad |z|>|w|.

The positive integer modes give a geometric series, and ψ02=1/2\psi_0^2=1/2 gives its constant term. For a diagonal component in an orthonormal target basis, this is the relevant scalar kernel; the two-point function includes the corresponding metric sign. Spin-dependent antisymmetric zero-mode expectations do not enter the trace defining TψT_\psi.

Write z=w+εz=w+\varepsilon. Expanding near coincidence gives

KR(z,w)=1z−w+z−w8w2+O((z−w)2).K_{\rm R}(z,w) =\frac1{z-w}+\frac{z-w}{8w^2}+O((z-w)^2).

In the expectation of Tψ=−:ψ∂ψ:/2T_\psi=-:\psi\partial\psi:/2, the derivative acts on the second insertion before taking the coincident limit:

⟨Tψ(w)⟩R=−12lim⁡z→w[∂wKR(z,w)−1(z−w)2]=116w2.\begin{aligned} \langle T_\psi(w)\rangle_{\rm R} &=-\frac12\lim_{z\to w} \left[\partial_wK_{\rm R}(z,w)-\frac1{(z-w)^2}\right]\\ &=\frac1{16w^2}. \end{aligned}

Thus each real fermion supplies plane weight 1/161/16, and the zero-momentum bosons supply zero. The result also follows from the cylinder-kernel calculation on the previous page.

Notice that D/16=c/24D/16=c/24 uses the central charge c=3D/2c=3D/2 of the full boson–fermion system. It is not cψ/24c_\psi/24, since cψ=D/2c_\psi=D/2.

For a positive-norm unitary Ramond representation, G0†=G0G_0^\dagger=G_0 implies

∥G0∣h⟩∥2=(h−c24)∥∣h⟩∥2,h≥c24.\|G_0\lvert h\rangle\|^2 =\left(h-\frac c{24}\right)\|\lvert h\rangle\|^2, \qquad h\geq\frac c{24}.

Equality holds precisely when G0∣h⟩=0G_0\lvert h\rangle=0. The algebra and unitarity do not guarantee that a state attaining equality exists. The free zero-momentum vacuum saturates the bound by the explicit calculation above.

For a concrete contrast, the unitary tricritical Ising superconformal theory has c=7/10c=7/10 and lowest Ramond weight h=3/80h=3/80, which is greater than c/24=7/240c/24=7/240. This example and the representation-theoretic distinction were established by Friedan, Qiu, and Shenker. In the covariant RNS matter theory, the algebraic free-vacuum weight remains correct, but its indefinite target-time inner product precludes applying the positive-norm proof indiscriminately.

Compare plane weights, cylinder energies, and string intercepts

Section titled “Compare plane weights, cylinder energies, and string intercepts”

At zero momentum the free matter vacua have

Quantity for one chiral sector of DD coordinate multipletsNSR
Plane vacuum weight hvach_{\rm vac}00D/16D/16
Cylinder vacuum energy Evac=hvac−c/24E_{\rm vac}=h_{\rm vac}-c/24−D/16-D/1600

The Ramond spin field creates a state of nonzero plane weight while the corresponding cylinder ground state has zero energy. This is a coordinate-dependent energy shift, not a disappearance of the spin field’s scaling dimension.

Subtracting c over 24 maps the NS and Ramond plane vacuum weights to their cylinder energies

For DD free coordinate multiplets at zero momentum, both sectors undergo the same shift −c/24=−D/16-c/24=-D/16. The resulting cylinder energies are −D/16-D/16 in NS and zero in R. In R, G02=L0G_0^2=\mathcal L_0 uses this cylinder generator. These are chiral matter quantities; physical string intercepts require the transverse or equivalent constrained theory. The comparison is schematic, not an energy-axis plot.

After the light-cone constraints remove the two longitudinal multiplets, replace DD by the number of transverse directions d⊥=D−2d_\perp=D-2. The physical intercept is minus the transverse cylinder vacuum energy. At critical D=10D=10,

aNS=d⊥16=12,aR=0.a_{\rm NS}=\frac{d_\perp}{16}=\frac12, \qquad a_{\rm R}=0.

This is not a prescription to insert D/16D/16 into a covariant mass formula as its intercept. The transverse reduction and the criticality conditions are essential; exercise 5 checks the zero-point energies directly.

For closed strings, the two chiral sectors can be combined as NS–NS, NS–R, R–NS, or R–R. Tensor representations arise from NS–NS and R–R, while the mixed sectors carry spacetime spinors. A consistent projection and left–right pairing must still be chosen. The supersymmetric choices and the physical spectrum are the subject of the next page.

1. How the currents act on individual oscillators

Section titled “1. How the currents act on individual oscillators”

Starting from the oscillator bilinears, derive [Lm,αnμ][L_m,\alpha_n^\mu], [Lm,ψrμ][L_m,\psi_r^\mu], [Gr,αnμ][G_r,\alpha_n^\mu], and {Gr,ψsμ}\{G_r,\psi_s^\mu\}. Use them to verify the levels and the transversality condition for ζ⋅ψ−1/2∣q⟩NS\zeta\cdot\psi_{-1/2}\lvert q\rangle_{\rm NS}.

Solution

The scalar ordering term in LmL_m commutes with every oscillator, so it does not enter these calculations. In the bosonic bilinear, contracting either oscillator against αnμ\alpha_n^\mu gives the same contribution. The factor 1/21/2 cancels their multiplicity:

[Lm,αnμ]=−nαm+nμ.[L_m,\alpha_n^\mu]=-n\alpha_{m+n}^\mu.

For an even product of two odd operators, use

[AB,C]=A{B,C}−{A,C}B.[AB,C]=A\{B,C\}-\{A,C\}B.

The two contractions in the fermionic bilinear then give

[Lm,ψrμ]=12(−r−m2)ψm+rμ−12(r+m2)ψm+rμ=−(r+m2)ψm+rμ.\begin{aligned} [L_m,\psi_r^\mu] &=\frac12\left(-r-\frac m2\right)\psi_{m+r}^\mu -\frac12\left(r+\frac m2\right)\psi_{m+r}^\mu\\ &=-\left(r+\frac m2\right)\psi_{m+r}^\mu. \end{aligned}

The remaining two relations follow from the mixed bilinear GrG_r:

[Gr,αnμ]=−nψr+nμ,{Gr,ψsμ}=αr+sμ.[G_r,\alpha_n^\mu]=-n\psi_{r+n}^\mu, \qquad \{G_r,\psi_s^\mu\}=\alpha_{r+s}^\mu.

For the second identity the bosonic oscillator commutes past ψs\psi_s, and the fermion anticommutator selects the single term with bosonic index r+sr+s.

Setting m=0m=0 verifies that α−n\alpha_{-n} raises the weight by nn and ψ−r\psi_{-r} by rr. Furthermore,

G1/2 ζ⋅ψ−1/2∣q⟩=ζ⋅α0∣q⟩−ζ⋅ψ−1/2G1/2∣q⟩=(ζ⋅q)∣q⟩.\begin{aligned} G_{1/2}\,\zeta\cdot\psi_{-1/2}\lvert q\rangle &=\zeta\cdot\alpha_0\lvert q\rangle -\zeta\cdot\psi_{-1/2}G_{1/2}\lvert q\rangle\\ &=(\zeta\cdot q)\lvert q\rangle. \end{aligned}

For r>1/2r>1/2, the selected αr−1/2\alpha_{r-1/2} is a positive mode and annihilates the ground state. Positive LmL_m also annihilate the state, because they produce a positive fermion mode. Thus ζ⋅q=0\zeta\cdot q=0 is exactly the additional superprimary condition at this level. Its norm is proportional to ζ∗⋅ζ\zeta^*\cdot\zeta; a covariant timelike polarization would have negative norm, illustrating why superprimary and physical positive-norm state are different notions.

2. A level-three-halves Gram matrix and a null state

Section titled “2. A level-three-halves Gram matrix and a null state”

Let ∣h⟩\lvert h\rangle be a normalized NS superconformal primary. At level 3/23/2, use the ordered basis

∣1⟩=G−3/2∣h⟩,∣2⟩=L−1G−1/2∣h⟩.\lvert1\rangle=G_{-3/2}\lvert h\rangle, \qquad \lvert2\rangle=L_{-1}G_{-1/2}\lvert h\rangle.

Compute its Gram matrix and determinant. At c=3/2c=3/2, h=1/2h=1/2, find the singular vector. Then realize ∣h⟩=ψ−1/2∣0⟩\lvert h\rangle=\psi_{-1/2}\lvert0\rangle in a single free spacelike coordinate multiplet at zero momentum and check that the singular vector has zero image in this Fock module.

Solution

The first norm follows directly from the odd anticommutator:

⟨1∣1⟩=⟨h∣G3/2G−3/2∣h⟩=2h+2c3.\langle1|1\rangle =\langle h|G_{3/2}G_{-3/2}|h\rangle =2h+\frac{2c}{3}.

For the off-diagonal entry, commute G3/2G_{3/2} past L−1L_{-1}. The commutator is 2G1/22G_{1/2}, and the remaining positive modes annihilate ∣h⟩\lvert h\rangle. Therefore

⟨1∣2⟩=2⟨h∣G1/2G−1/2∣h⟩=4h.\langle1|2\rangle =2\langle h|G_{1/2}G_{-1/2}|h\rangle=4h.

The state G−1/2∣h⟩G_{-1/2}\lvert h\rangle is a Virasoro primary of weight h+1/2h+1/2 and norm 2h2h. Its L−1L_{-1} descendant has norm 2(h+1/2)2(h+1/2) times that norm. Thus

M3/2=(2h+2c/34h4h4h(h+1/2)),M_{3/2}= \begin{pmatrix} 2h+2c/3&4h\\ 4h&4h(h+1/2) \end{pmatrix},

and

det⁡M3/2=4h[2h2+(2c3−3)h+c3].\det M_{3/2} =4h\left[ 2h^2+\left(\frac{2c}{3}-3\right)h+\frac c3 \right].

At c=3/2c=3/2, h=1/2h=1/2, every matrix entry is 22, so

∣χ⟩=(G−3/2−L−1G−1/2)∣h⟩\lvert\chi\rangle =\left(G_{-3/2}-L_{-1}G_{-1/2}\right)\lvert h\rangle

has zero norm and is orthogonal to the level-3/23/2 space. It is also annihilated by the positive modes. In particular,

G1/2∣χ⟩=(1−2h)L−1∣h⟩=0,G3/2∣χ⟩=(2c3−2h)∣h⟩=0,L1∣χ⟩=(1−2h)G−1/2∣h⟩=0.\begin{aligned} G_{1/2}\lvert\chi\rangle &=(1-2h)L_{-1}\lvert h\rangle=0,\\ G_{3/2}\lvert\chi\rangle &=\left(\frac{2c}{3}-2h\right)\lvert h\rangle=0,\\ L_1\lvert\chi\rangle &=(1-2h)G_{-1/2}\lvert h\rangle=0. \end{aligned}

Higher positive modes vanish by the highest-weight conditions and the grading. The vector is therefore a singular vector in the abstract Verma module. The irreducible module removes it and its descendants.

Now use one free spacelike boson and fermion. At zero momentum,

G−1/2ψ−1/2∣0⟩=α−1∣0⟩,L−1α−1∣0⟩=α−2∣0⟩.G_{-1/2}\psi_{-1/2}\lvert0\rangle =\alpha_{-1}\lvert0\rangle, \qquad L_{-1}\alpha_{-1}\lvert0\rangle =\alpha_{-2}\lvert0\rangle.

Also,

G−3/2ψ−1/2∣0⟩=α−2∣0⟩−ψ−1/2G−3/2∣0⟩.G_{-3/2}\psi_{-1/2}\lvert0\rangle =\alpha_{-2}\lvert0\rangle -\psi_{-1/2}G_{-3/2}\lvert0\rangle.

Here G−3/2∣0⟩=α−1ψ−1/2∣0⟩G_{-3/2}\lvert0\rangle =\alpha_{-1}\psi_{-1/2}\lvert0\rangle, so the second term is zero because ψ−1/22=0\psi_{-1/2}^2=0. Both descendants equal α−2∣0⟩\alpha_{-2}\lvert0\rangle. The abstract singular vector thus maps to the zero vector in this free-field representation.

3. Ramond doublets and the saturation condition

Section titled “3. Ramond doublets and the saturation condition”

Consider a positive-norm Ramond representation with a fermion-parity operator PP, satisfying P2=1P^2=1, PG0=−G0PPG_0=-G_0P, and [P,L0]=0[P,L_0]=0. For a normalized highest-weight state ∣+⟩\lvert+\rangle with P=+1P=+1 and weight h>c/24h>c/24, construct its partner and the matrices representing PP and G0G_0 on the pair. Explain what changes at h=c/24h=c/24 and whether the algebra fixes the number of ground states there.

Solution

Put Δ=h−c/24>0\Delta=h-c/24>0. Define

∣−⟩=1ΔG0∣+⟩.\lvert-\rangle=\frac1{\sqrt\Delta}G_0\lvert+\rangle.

The zero-mode identity gives ⟨−∣−⟩=1\langle- |-\rangle=1, and fermion parity makes the two states orthogonal. Since [L0,G0]=0[L_0,G_0]=0, their weights agree. Positive modes also annihilate the partner:

LnG0∣+⟩=n2Gn∣+⟩=0,GnG0∣+⟩=2Ln∣+⟩=0(n>0).L_nG_0\lvert+\rangle=\frac n2G_n\lvert+\rangle=0, \qquad G_nG_0\lvert+\rangle=2L_n\lvert+\rangle=0 \quad(n>0).

Moreover, G0∣−⟩=Δ ∣+⟩G_0\lvert-\rangle=\sqrt\Delta\,\lvert+\rangle. In the basis (∣+⟩,∣−⟩)(\lvert+\rangle,\lvert-\rangle),

P=(100−1),G0=Δ(0110),L0=Δ 1.P=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}, \qquad G_0=\sqrt\Delta \begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \mathcal L_0=\Delta\,\mathbf1.

Thus positive cylinder energy occurs in opposite-parity pairs. Such a pair contributes zero to a fermion-parity weighted count of states at the same energy.

At Δ=0\Delta=0, positivity implies G0∣h⟩=0G_0\lvert h\rangle=0 for every vector in that eigenspace. The normalization used above is then unavailable: there is no nonzero partner generated by G0G_0. The algebra allows unpaired states, but does not determine their number or their parities, and does not require a saturating state to exist.

In a free zero-momentum RNS ground space, G0=0G_0=0 on every ground state even though the individual ψ0μ\psi_0^\mu act nontrivially as Clifford generators. There is no contradiction: G0G_0 is the contraction q⋅ψ0q\cdot\psi_0 there, not an individual Clifford generator. The positive-norm reasoning applies directly to a spacelike or transverse unitary matter system, not to the unconstrained Lorentzian covariant Fock space.

4. Finite circumference and coordinate-independent norms

Section titled “4. Finite circumference and coordinate-independent norms”

Consider a two-dimensional CFT cylinder of spatial circumference ℓ\ell, with propagation speed one, using z=exp⁡(2πw/ℓ)z=\exp(2\pi w/\ell). Derive the Hamiltonian for two chiral sectors of equal central charge cc. Then check that the norm of L−m∣0⟩NSL_{-m}\lvert0\rangle_{\rm NS}, m>0m>0, is unchanged when calculated with plane or cylinder generators. Contrast it with the norm above a free Ramond ground state of plane weight c/24c/24.

Solution

Write a=2π/ℓa=2\pi/\ell. The Schwarzian is {eaw,w}=−a2/2\{e^{aw},w\}=-a^2/2, so

Tcyl(w)=a2[z2T(z)−c24].T_{\rm cyl}(w) =a^2\left[z^2T(z)-\frac c{24}\right].

Radial evolution by a ΔτEa\,\Delta\tau_E corresponds to cylinder time evolution by ΔτE\Delta\tau_E. The Hamiltonian and spatial momentum are therefore

Hws=2πℓ(L0+L~0−c12),Pws=2πℓ(L0−L~0).H_{\rm ws}=\frac{2\pi}{\ell} \left(L_0+\widetilde L_0-\frac c{12}\right), \qquad P_{\rm ws}=\frac{2\pi}{\ell}(L_0-\widetilde L_0).

The factor 2π/ℓ2\pi/\ell converts dimensionless mode eigenvalues to inverse-length energy units. These are worldsheet CFT energies and momenta, not target-space string energies.

For the NS–NS identity vacuum, Hws=−πc/(6ℓ)H_{\rm ws}=-\pi c/(6\ell). For two free Ramond vacua, each with h=c/24h=c/24, the total vacuum energy is zero. The same subtraction is present in both sectors.

For one chiral NS vacuum, the plane calculation gives

∥L−m∣0⟩NS∥2=c12(m3−m).\|L_{-m}\lvert0\rangle_{\rm NS}\|^2 =\frac c{12}(m^3-m).

For m≠0m\neq0, Lm=Lm\mathcal L_m=L_m. In cylinder language,

∥L−m∣0⟩NS∥2=2m(−c24)+c12m3=c12(m3−m).\begin{aligned} \|\mathcal L_{-m}\lvert0\rangle_{\rm NS}\|^2 &=2m\left(-\frac c{24}\right)+\frac c{12}m^3\\ &=\frac c{12}(m^3-m). \end{aligned}

The nonzero vacuum energy compensates for the changed central polynomial. In particular the m=1m=1 descendant remains null.

For a normalized free Ramond ground state, the plane weight is c/24c/24 and the cylinder energy is zero. Hence either calculation gives

∥L−m∣R⟩∥2=2mc24+c12(m3−m)=c12m3.\|L_{-m}\lvert R\rangle\|^2 =2m\frac c{24}+\frac c{12}(m^3-m) =\frac c{12}m^3.

The different norm is a property of the state, not a coordinate artifact. Changing coordinates changes both the zero-mode eigenvalue and the displayed central term together.

5. Regulate the transverse zero-point energies

Section titled “5. Regulate the transverse zero-point energies”

For one free spacelike boson–fermion pair, regulate each positive oscillator frequency ω\omega with the same factor e−ϵωe^{-\epsilon\omega}. Compute the finite parts of

EB(ϵ)=12∑n=1∞ne−ϵn,EF(ν)(ϵ)=−12∑r>0, r∈Z+νre−ϵr.E_{\rm B}(\epsilon)=\frac12\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}ne^{-\epsilon n}, \qquad E_{\rm F}^{(\nu)}(\epsilon) =-\frac12\sum_{r>0,\ r\in\mathbb Z+\nu}r e^{-\epsilon r}.

Obtain the NS and R intercepts for the eight transverse multiplets of a critical superstring. Explain why neither the critical dimension nor spacetime supersymmetry follows from this sum alone.

Solution

The boson sum is a derivative of a geometric series:

EB(ϵ)=12e−ϵ(1−e−ϵ)2=12ϵ2−124+O(ϵ2).E_{\rm B}(\epsilon) =\frac12\frac{e^{-\epsilon}}{(1-e^{-\epsilon})^2} =\frac1{2\epsilon^2}-\frac1{24}+O(\epsilon^2).

In the NS sector,

∑r>0, r∈Z+1/2e−ϵr=12sinh⁡(ϵ/2).\sum_{r>0,\ r\in\mathbb Z+1/2}e^{-\epsilon r} =\frac1{2\sinh(\epsilon/2)}.

Taking minus its derivative gives the frequency-weighted sum. Thus

EFNS(ϵ)=−cosh⁡(ϵ/2)8sinh⁡2(ϵ/2)=−12ϵ2−148+O(ϵ2).E_{\rm F}^{\rm NS}(\epsilon) =-\frac{\cosh(\epsilon/2)}{8\sinh^2(\epsilon/2)} =-\frac1{2\epsilon^2}-\frac1{48}+O(\epsilon^2).

The divergent terms cancel within the pair, leaving

E0NS=−124−148=−116.E_0^{\rm NS}=-\frac1{24}-\frac1{48}=-\frac1{16}.

In R the positive fermion frequencies are the same integers as the boson frequencies, so EFR(ϵ)=−EB(ϵ)E_{\rm F}^{\rm R}(\epsilon)=-E_{\rm B}(\epsilon) exactly. Zero-frequency Clifford modes contribute degeneracy but no zero-point energy. Therefore E0R=0E_0^{\rm R}=0.

After the longitudinal constraints are solved, eight transverse pairs give

E0,⊥NS=−12,E0,⊥R=0,a=−E0,⊥.E_{0,\perp}^{\rm NS}=-\frac12, \qquad E_{0,\perp}^{\rm R}=0, \qquad a=-E_{0,\perp}.

The open-string mass equations then take the form

α′M2=N−12(NS),α′M2=N(R).\alpha'M^2=N-\frac12\quad(\mathrm{NS}), \qquad \alpha'M^2=N\quad(\mathrm{R}).

The unprojected NS ground state is still tachyonic; the first fermionic excitation has N=1/2N=1/2 and is massless. The Ramond ground state is massless. Selecting the supersymmetric spectrum requires the appropriate GSO projection and physical constraints.

The calculation assumed eight transverse multiplets rather than proving that number. Criticality requires anomaly cancellation or quantum Lorentz consistency. Nor does cancellation of the R zero-point energy by itself establish a spacetime supercharge relating the physical NS and R states.

6. A finite Fock-space check of the Ramond ordering term

Section titled “6. A finite Fock-space check of the Ramond ordering term”

Use one real spacelike fermion and its oscillator bilinear to compute ∥L−mψ∣vac⟩∥2\|L_{-m}^{\psi}\lvert{\rm vac}\rangle\|^2 for positive integer mm, separately in NS and R. Write the state as a finite sum of two-fermion creation states, treating the R zero mode separately. Compare with the Virasoro algebra at cψ=1/2c_\psi=1/2, and then add one boson to recover the full free-multiplet result.

Solution

For m>0m>0, only terms with two nonpositive frequencies survive on the vacuum. Pairing terms related by fermion exchange gives

L−mψ∣vac⟩=∑0<r<m/2r∈Z+ν(m2−r)ψ−(m−r)ψ−r∣vac⟩+{0,NS,m2ψ−mψ0∣vac⟩,R.\begin{aligned} L_{-m}^{\psi}\lvert{\rm vac}\rangle ={}&\sum_{\substack{0<r<m/2\\r\in\mathbb Z+\nu}} \left(\frac m2-r\right) \psi_{-(m-r)}\psi_{-r}\lvert{\rm vac}\rangle\\ &+\begin{cases} 0,&\mathrm{NS},\\ \dfrac m2\psi_{-m}\psi_0\lvert{\rm vac}\rangle,&\mathrm{R}. \end{cases} \end{aligned}

The would-be equal-frequency term at r=m/2r=m/2 vanishes, both by its coefficient and by ψ−r2=0\psi_{-r}^2=0. Each positive-frequency pair has unit norm. Distinct pairs are orthogonal. In R, the final state has norm 1/21/2 because ψ02=1/2\psi_0^2=1/2.

It follows that

ANS(m)=∑0<r<m/2r∈Z+1/2(m2−r)2=m3−m24,AR(m)=∑0<r<m/2r∈Z(m2−r)2+m28=m3+2m24.\begin{aligned} A_{\rm NS}(m) &=\sum_{\substack{0<r<m/2\\r\in\mathbb Z+1/2}} \left(\frac m2-r\right)^2 =\frac{m^3-m}{24},\\ A_{\rm R}(m) &=\sum_{\substack{0<r<m/2\\r\in\mathbb Z}} \left(\frac m2-r\right)^2+\frac{m^2}{8} =\frac{m^3+2m}{24}. \end{aligned}

These sums are finite. For example, if m=2km=2k, the NS sum is ∑j=0k−1(j+1/2)2=k(4k2−1)/12\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}(j+1/2)^2=k(4k^2-1)/12, while the R sum is ∑j=1k−1j2+k2/2=k(2k2+1)/6\sum_{j=1}^{k-1}j^2+k^2/2=k(2k^2+1)/6. If m=2k+1m=2k+1, the NS sum is ∑j=1kj2=k(k+1)(2k+1)/6\sum_{j=1}^{k}j^2=k(k+1)(2k+1)/6; the R sum is ∑j=0k−1(j+1/2)2+(2k+1)2/8\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}(j+1/2)^2+(2k+1)^2/8. All four expressions reduce to the two displayed polynomials.

For a Virasoro highest-weight state, the same norm must equal

2mhψ+cψ12(m3−m).2mh_\psi+\frac{c_\psi}{12}(m^3-m).

With cψ=1/2c_\psi=1/2, the NS result gives hψ=0h_\psi=0. The R result instead requires hψ=1/16h_\psi=1/16. Omitting the R zero-mode contribution would give the wrong polynomial; omitting the plane L0L_0 constant would also disagree with the finite Fock calculation.

A zero-momentum boson adds (m3−m)/12(m^3-m)/12 in both sectors. Thus one complete multiplet has

ANSX,ψ(m)=m3−m8,ARX,ψ(m)=m38.A_{\rm NS}^{X,\psi}(m)=\frac{m^3-m}{8}, \qquad A_{\rm R}^{X,\psi}(m)=\frac{m^3}{8}.

Since c=3/2c=3/2 for the pair, these agree with the plane/cylinder state-norm comparison in exercise 4. This independent check uses finite oscillator states, without assigning a value to an infinite vacuum sum.

  • Friedan, Daniel, Zongan Qiu, and Stephen Shenker. “Superconformal invariance in two dimensions and the tricritical Ising model.” Physics Letters B 151, no. 1 (1985): 37–43. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90819-6.
  • Neveu, André, and John H. Schwarz. “Factorizable dual model of pions.” Nuclear Physics B 31, no. 1 (1971): 86–112. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(71)90448-2.
  • Ramond, Pierre. “Dual Theory for Free Fermions.” Physical Review D 3, no. 10 (1971): 2415–2418. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2415.
  • Weigand, Timo. Introduction to String Theory. Lecture notes, Universität Heidelberg, winter term 2011/12, sections 6.3–6.4. Author’s PDF.