Skip to content

Classical Rotating Strings and the Regge Slope

A longer string can carry more angular momentum, but tension makes it more energetic. For a freely rotating open string, these effects combine into the classical relation J=α′M2J=\alpha'M^2. We will derive it from an explicit solution, identify the center-of-mass frame, and prove that this solution maximizes a component of angular momentum at fixed energy within a specified classical sector. Folded strings then explain why other trajectories have smaller slopes.

The setting is a free classical string in flat, noncompact target spacetime. The open string has Neumann conditions in every target direction and no endpoint masses. We use the global conventions and the equations and currents derived on the conformal-gauge page. Quantum intercepts are discussed only as a preview at the end.

On 0≤σ≤π0\leq\sigma\leq\pi, consider

X0=Aτ,X1=Acos⁡σcos⁡τ,X2=Acos⁡σsin⁡τ,A>0,\begin{aligned} X^0&=A\tau,\\ X^1&=A\cos\sigma\cos\tau,\\ X^2&=A\cos\sigma\sin\tau, \end{aligned} \qquad A>0,

with the other spatial coordinates zero. The positive constant AA has dimensions of length. It is both the half-length of the spatial segment and the conversion between dimensionless worldsheet time and target time,

t=X0=Aτ.t=X^0=A\tau.

At fixed tt, the signed coordinate along the segment is r=Acos⁡σr=A\cos\sigma. As σ\sigma goes from 00 to π\pi, the string runs from r=Ar=A through its center to r=−Ar=-A. Its instantaneous physical length is 2A2A.

The physical angular velocity and velocity field are

Ω=dτdt=1A,v(τ,σ)=cos⁡σ (−sin⁡τ,cos⁡τ).\Omega=\frac{d\tau}{dt}=\frac1A, \qquad \mathbf v(\tau,\sigma) =\cos\sigma\,(-\sin\tau,\cos\tau).

Consequently ∣v∣=∣cos⁡σ∣=∣r∣/A|\mathbf v|=|\cos\sigma|=|r|/A. The endpoints move at unit speed, the midpoint is stationary, and the string rotates counterclockwise in the displayed orientation. The frequency 11 in cos⁡τ\cos\tau is not a dimensionful angular velocity.

A straight open string rotates counterclockwise with lightlike endpoints and a stationary center

At t=0t=0, the endpoint σ=0\sigma=0 lies at X1=AX^1=A and moves upward, while σ=π\sigma=\pi lies at X1=−AX^1=-A and moves downward. The physical angular velocity is Ω=1/A\Omega=1/A, and the speed varies as ∣cos⁡σ∣|\cos\sigma|. The segment geometry is exact for this solution; arrows show velocity directions schematically.

Wave equation, endpoint conditions, and constraints

Section titled “Wave equation, endpoint conditions, and constraints”

Both nonzero spatial coordinates have second τ\tau and σ\sigma derivatives equal to minus themselves. Hence X¨μ−X′′μ=0\ddot X^\mu-X''{}^\mu=0. Their first spatial derivatives are proportional to sin⁡σ\sin\sigma, so all Neumann conditions hold at 00 and π\pi. A sine spatial profile would not satisfy the same conditions.

The wave equation is only part of the problem. Including the negative target-time contribution gives

X˙2=−A2+A2cos⁡2σ=−A2sin⁡2σ,X′2=A2sin⁡2σ,X˙⋅X′=0.\begin{aligned} \dot X^2&=-A^2+A^2\cos^2\sigma=-A^2\sin^2\sigma,\\ X'^2&=A^2\sin^2\sigma,\\ \dot X\cdot X'&=0. \end{aligned}

The velocity and the spatial tangent are perpendicular, and the two diagonal contributions cancel. Therefore

C±±=14(X˙±X′)2=0.C_{\pm\pm}=\frac14(\dot X\pm X')^2=0.

The induced metric is

Hab=A2sin⁡2σ(−1001).H_{ab}=A^2\sin^2\sigma \begin{pmatrix}-1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}.

It is nondegenerate and timelike in the interior. At the endpoints it degenerates because the endpoint trajectory is null and X′=0X'=0. This does not make the auxiliary conformal-gauge metric singular. As explained on the previous page, lightlike endpoint motion is a property of an all-Neumann endpoint; a string held by Dirichlet supports need not have lightlike endpoints.

The translation and rotation charges are

Pμ=T∫0πdσ X˙μ,J12=T∫0πdσ (X1X˙2−X2X˙1).P^\mu=T\int_0^\pi d\sigma\,\dot X^\mu, \qquad J^{12}=T\int_0^\pi d\sigma\, (X^1\dot X^2-X^2\dot X^1).

They are conserved here because the corresponding current fluxes vanish at the all-Neumann endpoints. The energy is

E=P0=πTA.E=P^0=\pi TA.

The spatial momentum is explicitly zero:

P=TA(−sin⁡τ,cos⁡τ)∫0πcos⁡σ dσ=0.\mathbf P =TA(-\sin\tau,\cos\tau)\int_0^\pi\cos\sigma\,d\sigma =0.

Thus the displayed solution is already in its center-of-mass frame. Its invariant mass obeys M2=E2−P2=E2M^2=E^2-\mathbf P^2=E^2, with E>0E>0, so M=EM=E.

For the angular momentum, the two terms add:

X1X˙2−X2X˙1=A2cos⁡2σ.X^1\dot X^2-X^2\dot X^1=A^2\cos^2\sigma.

Writing J=J12>0J=J^{12}>0 for this orientation,

J=TA2∫0πcos⁡2σ dσ=πTA22.J=TA^2\int_0^\pi\cos^2\sigma\,d\sigma =\frac{\pi TA^2}{2}.

Eliminating AA gives

J=E22πT=α′E2=α′M2.J=\frac{E^2}{2\pi T}=\alpha'E^2=\alpha'M^2.

The dimensions provide a useful check: [T]=length−2[T]=\text{length}^{-2}, [E]=length−1[E]=\text{length}^{-1}, and angular momentum is dimensionless in units with ℏ=1\hbar=1. A larger tension gives a smaller slope in a plot of JJ against M2M^2.

The densities per unit worldsheet coordinate are particularly simple:

dEdσ=TA,dJdσ=TA2cos⁡2σ.\frac{dE}{d\sigma}=TA, \qquad \frac{dJ}{d\sigma}=TA^2\cos^2\sigma.

Uniform coordinate energy density does not mean uniform density along the physical segment. At a fixed target time,

dℓ=∣dr∣=Asin⁡σ dσ,r=Acos⁡σ.d\ell=|dr|=A\sin\sigma\,d\sigma, \qquad r=A\cos\sigma.

Thus the positive densities per unit arclength are

dEdℓ=T1−r2/A2,dJdℓ=r2AdEdℓ.\frac{dE}{d\ell} =\frac{T}{\sqrt{1-r^2/A^2}}, \qquad \frac{dJ}{d\ell} =\frac{r^2}{A}\frac{dE}{d\ell}.

The absolute value in dℓ=∣dr∣d\ell=|dr| matters: rr decreases as σ\sigma increases. When integrating with increasing rr, these expressions define positive densities on −A<r<A-A<r<A.

There is also a direct physical derivation. The velocity is transverse to the local string tangent, so a small segment has Nambu–Goto Lagrangian −T dℓ1−v2-T\,d\ell\sqrt{1-v^2}. Its energy and momentum magnitude are

dE=T dℓ1−v2,dp=Tv dℓ1−v2.dE=\frac{T\,d\ell}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}, \qquad dp=\frac{T v\,d\ell}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}.

Using v=∣r∣/Av=|r|/A and the sign of the tangential velocity gives dJ=r2dE/AdJ=r^2dE/A. This reproduces the densities obtained from the worldsheet currents.

Uniform energy density in the worldsheet coordinate becomes an integrably divergent density near the physical endpoints

The coordinate panel uses u=σ/πu=\sigma/\pi and densities normalized by TATA and TA2TA^2. The physical panel uses q=r/Aq=r/A and arclength densities normalized by TT and TATA. Solid curves show energy and dashed curves show spin. The physical curves diverge as ∣q∣→1|q|\to1 and are truncated in the drawing; both endpoint singularities are integrable. The panels use different integration measures, so their plotted areas should not be compared directly.

Near the endpoint r=Ar=A, put s=A−rs=A-r. Then

dEdℓ∼TA2s.\frac{dE}{d\ell}\sim T\sqrt{\frac{A}{2s}}.

The energy in a terminal segment of physical length δ\delta is therefore finite and tends to zero:

Ecap=TAarccos⁡ ⁣(1−δA)∼T2Aδ(δ≪A).E_{\mathrm{cap}} =TA\arccos\!\left(1-\frac{\delta}{A}\right) \sim T\sqrt{2A\delta} \quad(\delta\ll A).

There is no infinite point energy attached to the massless endpoint. The divergent density expresses the increasingly large Lorentz factor of nearby string elements.

The total energy is E=M=πTAE=M=\pi TA, whereas tension times the instantaneous length is 2TA2TA. The latter is the sum of the local segment rest energies for this transverse motion. It is not the invariant mass of the whole rotating string, which includes the internal kinetic energy even in the center-of-mass frame. A static straight segment of the same length would require supports and would be a different boundary problem.

An explicit solution establishes a trajectory. To call it a leading classical trajectory, we should show that no allowed configuration in the comparison class carries more angular momentum at the same energy.

Consider an isolated all-Neumann string with timelike total momentum, in its center-of-mass frame. Assume that temporal conformal gauge is available,

X0=κτ,κ>0.X^0=\kappa\tau,\qquad \kappa>0.

Then E=πTκE=\pi T\kappa. Since P=T∫x˙ dσ=0\mathbf P=T\int\dot{\mathbf x}\,d\sigma=0, the mean spatial position is time independent. Translate the origin so that

∫0πx(τ,σ) dσ=0.\int_0^\pi\mathbf x(\tau,\sigma)\,d\sigma=0.

Because P=0\mathbf P=0, this change of origin does not change the angular momentum. The constraints are

∣x˙∣2+∣x′∣2=κ2,x˙⋅x′=0.|\dot{\mathbf x}|^2+|\mathbf x'|^2=\kappa^2, \qquad \dot{\mathbf x}\cdot\mathbf x'=0.

Let ∥f∥2=∫0π∣f∣2dσ\|f\|^2=\int_0^\pi |f|^2d\sigma. For a mean-zero Neumann profile, the cosine expansion has no constant mode:

f(σ)=∑n≥1ancos⁡nσ.f(\sigma)=\sum_{n\geq1}a_n\cos n\sigma.

Orthogonality gives

∥f∥2=π2∑n≥1∣an∣2,∥f′∥2=π2∑n≥1n2∣an∣2.\|f\|^2=\frac\pi2\sum_{n\geq1}|a_n|^2, \qquad \|f'\|^2=\frac\pi2\sum_{n\geq1}n^2|a_n|^2.

Consequently ∥f∥≤∥f′∥\|f\|\leq\|f'\|. This is the sharp Neumann Wirtinger inequality on this interval; equality for a nonzero profile requires only the first spatial harmonic. The argument applies componentwise to a vector profile of finite energy.

Let x12=(x1,x2)\mathbf x_{12}=(x^1,x^2) and let R(x1,x2)=(−x2,x1)R(x^1,x^2)=(-x^2,x^1) be a right-angle rotation. Cauchy–Schwarz, Wirtinger, and 2ab≤a2+b22ab\leq a^2+b^2 give

∣J12∣T=∣∫0π(Rx12)⋅x˙12 dσ∣≤∥x12∥ ∥x˙12∥≤∥x′∥ ∥x˙∥≤12(∥x′∥2+∥x˙∥2)=πκ22.\begin{aligned} \frac{|J^{12}|}{T} &=\left|\int_0^\pi (R\mathbf x_{12})\cdot\dot{\mathbf x}_{12}\,d\sigma\right|\\ &\leq\|\mathbf x_{12}\|\,\|\dot{\mathbf x}_{12}\|\\ &\leq\|\mathbf x'\|\,\|\dot{\mathbf x}\|\\ &\leq\frac12\left(\|\mathbf x'\|^2+\|\dot{\mathbf x}\|^2\right) =\frac{\pi\kappa^2}{2}. \end{aligned}

It follows that

∣J12∣≤E22πT=α′E2.|J^{12}|\leq\frac{E^2}{2\pi T}=\alpha'E^2.

Equality requires all of the intermediate inequalities to be equalities. Apart from constant translations, there can be no motion outside the chosen plane. At a given time,

x=acos⁡σ,x˙=±Racos⁡σ,∣a∣=κ.\mathbf x=\mathbf a\cos\sigma, \qquad \dot{\mathbf x}=\pm R\mathbf a\cos\sigma, \qquad |\mathbf a|=\kappa.

The wave equation evolves these initial data into the circularly polarized first harmonic. Thus the rotating segment saturates the bound; higher spatial harmonics cannot do so. This is a bound on a classical component of angular momentum in the rest frame, not a derivation of a quantum spin spectrum.

When temporal conformal gauge is available

Section titled “When temporal conformal gauge is available”

The gauge assumption can be made precise using the residual maps from the previous page. The time coordinate obeys the wave equation and Neumann conditions, so, after absorbing constants, write

X0=q(σ+)+q(σ−),q′(s+2π)=q′(s).X^0=q(\sigma^+)+q(\sigma^-), \qquad q'(s+2\pi)=q'(s).

Suppose q′(s)>0q'(s)>0 everywhere. Define κ\kappa by

q(s+2π)−q(s)=πκ,q(s+2\pi)-q(s)=\pi\kappa,

and use the common residual function f(s)=2q(s)/κf(s)=2q(s)/\kappa. Then f′>0f'>0 and f(s+2π)=f(s)+2πf(s+2\pi)=f(s)+2\pi, so it preserves both strip boundaries. In the new coordinates, X0=κτ~X^0=\kappa\widetilde\tau.

This construction requires the time chiral derivatives to remain nonzero with a consistent future orientation. It is not a proof that every possible embedding admits a single global temporal chart. Ordinary null endpoints, or the folds considered next, can have a degenerate induced metric while still satisfying q′>0q'>0; induced-metric degeneracy alone is not the criterion for failure of this gauge.

Higher harmonics and folded closed strings

Section titled “Higher harmonics and folded closed strings”

A useful family of open-string solutions is

X0=nAτ,x=Acos⁡(nσ)(cos⁡nτ,sin⁡nτ),n=1,2,….X^0=nA\tau, \qquad \mathbf x=A\cos(n\sigma)(\cos n\tau,\sin n\tau), \qquad n=1,2,\ldots.

The factor nn in X0X^0 is essential: it makes the time contribution cancel the spatial terms in the constraints. The physical angular velocity is still 1/A1/A, because the angle is nτn\tau and the target time is nAτnA\tau.

At a fixed time, the segment is covered nn times. There are interior folds at σ=kπ/n\sigma=k\pi/n, k=1,…,n−1k=1,\ldots,n-1, and the length counted along the string is 2nA2nA. Integrating the charges gives

En=nπTA,Jn=nπTA22,Jn=α′nEn2.E_n=n\pi TA, \qquad J_n=\frac{n\pi TA^2}{2}, \qquad J_n=\frac{\alpha'}{n}E_n^2.

The smaller slope expresses the distribution of energy among multiple coincident strands and higher modes. It does not mean that the fundamental tension has changed. At a fold, the induced metric degenerates, but the Polyakov embedding and its wave equation remain smooth. The local Nambu–Goto/Polyakov elimination argument applies away from these degeneracies.

For a closed string, use the first-harmonic embedding but take 0≤σ<2π0\leq\sigma<2\pi. It goes from one end of the segment to the other and back, covering the same geometric segment twice. The points σ=0,π\sigma=0,\pi are folds, not physical endpoints. Both strands contribute:

Eclosed=2πTA,Jclosed=πTA2,Jclosed=α′2Eclosed2.E_{\mathrm{closed}}=2\pi TA, \qquad J_{\mathrm{closed}}=\pi TA^2, \qquad J_{\mathrm{closed}}=\frac{\alpha'}2E_{\mathrm{closed}}^2.

The half slope therefore already has a classical explanation. The physical length counted along this closed string is 4A4A, even though its geometric span is 2A2A. Exercise 6 derives the corresponding sharp closed-string bound from the periodic Wirtinger inequality.

Continuous classical Regge lines have slope one for an open string and one half for a folded closed string in dimensionless axes

With horizontal coordinate α′M2\alpha'M^2 and vertical coordinate JJ, the first open harmonic lies on J=α′M2J=\alpha'M^2 and the folded closed solution on J=α′M2/2J=\alpha'M^2/2. The curves describe continuous classical families in their rest frames. They contain no quantum intercept or discrete-state prediction. The same fundamental tension enters both relations.

Classically, AA and JJ are continuous. Quantization replaces the continuous family by oscillator states and introduces normal-ordering constants. An angular-momentum quantization rule by itself does not determine those constants: the full fluctuation and constraint problem must be treated.

For the free critical bosonic string in flat spacetime, the leading open and closed trajectories are

Jopen=α′M2+1,Jclosed=α′2M2+2.J_{\mathrm{open}}=\alpha'M^2+1, \qquad J_{\mathrm{closed}}=\frac{\alpha'}2M^2+2.

These statements assume the standard critical bosonic spectrum, including its physical-state conditions; they are not conclusions of the classical calculation above. The order-one intercepts become small relative corrections at large spin. The classic analysis of the free string and its Lorentz consistency is due to Goddard, Goldstone, Rebbi, and Thorn; Tong’s lectures, especially sections 2.3 and 3.1.3, explain the connection to the highest-spin states.

Interactions, curved backgrounds, or massive endpoints require additional analysis. In particular, the free formulas do not justify a general claim that all quantum effects leave a trajectory unchanged. The next page develops the mode expansions; the physical-state and spectrum page explains the mass conditions.

1. Worldsheet frequency versus physical angular velocity

Section titled “1. Worldsheet frequency versus physical angular velocity”

Describe the first rotating solution using τ^=λτ\widehat\tau=\lambda\tau and σ^=λσ\widehat\sigma=\lambda\sigma, with λ>0\lambda>0. What are its coordinate frequency, spatial interval, and time-coordinate coefficient? Show that its physical angular velocity, energy, and spin are unchanged. Explain why changing only the frequency in the spatial embedding while retaining X0=AτX^0=A\tau would generally violate the constraints.

Solution

The reparametrized embedding is

X0=Aλτ^,x=Acos⁡ ⁣(σ^λ)(cos⁡τ^λ,sin⁡τ^λ),X^0=\frac{A}{\lambda}\widehat\tau, \qquad \mathbf x=A\cos\!\left(\frac{\widehat\sigma}{\lambda}\right) \left(\cos\frac{\widehat\tau}{\lambda}, \sin\frac{\widehat\tau}{\lambda}\right),

on 0≤σ^≤λπ0\leq\widehat\sigma\leq\lambda\pi. The coordinate frequency and time coefficient are 1/λ1/\lambda and A/λA/\lambda. Their ratio gives

Ω=1/λA/λ=1A.\Omega=\frac{1/\lambda}{A/\lambda}=\frac1A.

The passive coordinate change makes the auxiliary metric λ−2ηab\lambda^{-2}\eta_{ab}; a constant positive Weyl rescaling returns it to ηab\eta_{ab}. In this representative,

E=T∫0λπAλ dσ^=πTA,E=T\int_0^{\lambda\pi}\frac{A}{\lambda}\,d\widehat\sigma=\pi TA, J=T∫0λπA2λcos⁡2 ⁣(σ^λ)dσ^=πTA22.J=T\int_0^{\lambda\pi}\frac{A^2}{\lambda} \cos^2\!\left(\frac{\widehat\sigma}{\lambda}\right)d\widehat\sigma =\frac{\pi TA^2}{2}.

Thus the coordinate period changes while the physical charges and angular velocity do not. If instead the spatial solution contains cos⁡nσ\cos n\sigma and phase nτn\tau but time remains AτA\tau, then X˙2+X′2=(n2−1)A2\dot X^2+X'^2=(n^2-1)A^2. The necessary time coefficient is nAnA, as in the higher-harmonic solution. A frequency change is not automatically a gauge transformation with all other data held fixed.

For 0≤q≤10\leq q\leq1, find the fractions of total energy and angular momentum contained in the central portion ∣r∣≤qA|r|\leq qA. Evaluate them at q=1/2q=1/2. Explain why the outer half of the geometric length can carry most of the angular momentum without an infinite endpoint contribution.

Solution

Integrate the arclength densities with increasing signed coordinate rr and use r=Asin⁡θr=A\sin\theta. The central energy is

Ecentral=2TA∫0arcsin⁡qdθ=2TAarcsin⁡q.E_{\mathrm{central}} =2TA\int_0^{\arcsin q}d\theta =2TA\arcsin q.

The central angular momentum is

Jcentral=2TA2∫0arcsin⁡qsin⁡2θ dθ=TA2(arcsin⁡q−q1−q2).\begin{aligned} J_{\mathrm{central}} &=2TA^2\int_0^{\arcsin q}\sin^2\theta\,d\theta\\ &=TA^2\left(\arcsin q-q\sqrt{1-q^2}\right). \end{aligned}

Dividing by the total charges gives

EcentralE=2πarcsin⁡q,JcentralJ=2π(arcsin⁡q−q1−q2).\frac{E_{\mathrm{central}}}{E}=\frac2\pi\arcsin q, \qquad \frac{J_{\mathrm{central}}}{J} =\frac2\pi\left(\arcsin q-q\sqrt{1-q^2}\right).

At q=1/2q=1/2, the central portion has half the total geometric length, but its energy fraction is 1/31/3 and its spin fraction is

13−32π≃0.0577.\frac13-\frac{\sqrt3}{2\pi}\simeq0.0577.

The two outer portions carry 2/32/3 of the energy and approximately 0.94230.9423 of the spin. The extra r2r^2 in the spin density strongly suppresses the center. Both fractions approach one smoothly as q→1q\to1; the endpoint divergence integrates to a finite value, and the contribution of a shrinking endpoint cap tends to zero.

For the nnth open harmonic, verify the constraints and compute the length counted along the string. Compare its radius, physical angular velocity, length, and spin with the first harmonic at the same total energy. Identify the null folds and determine whether the two physical endpoints occupy opposite ends of the geometric segment.

Solution

The spatial velocity and tangent have squared norms n2A2cos⁡2nσn^2A^2\cos^2n\sigma and n2A2sin⁡2nσn^2A^2\sin^2n\sigma and are perpendicular. With X0=nAτX^0=nA\tau this gives

X˙2+X′2=0,X˙⋅X′=0.\dot X^2+X'^2=0,\qquad \dot X\cdot X'=0.

The spatial derivatives vanish at both boundaries because nn is an integer. The total length is

Ln=∫0πnA∣sin⁡nσ∣ dσ=2nA.L_n=\int_0^\pi nA|\sin n\sigma|\,d\sigma=2nA.

Let the first harmonic at the chosen energy have half-length A1=E/(πT)A_1=E/(\pi T). Since E=nπTAnE=n\pi TA_n, the nnth harmonic has

An=A1n,Ωn=nA1,Ln=2A1,Jn=J1n.A_n=\frac{A_1}{n}, \qquad \Omega_n=\frac{n}{A_1}, \qquad L_n=2A_1, \qquad J_n=\frac{J_1}{n}.

The counted length stays fixed, but it is packed into a smaller multiply covered segment. The spin decreases despite the larger angular velocity because the energy lies at smaller radii.

The points σ=kπ/n\sigma=k\pi/n have X′=0X'=0 and unit target speed. For k=1,…,n−1k=1,\ldots,n-1 they are internal folds; k=0,nk=0,n are the physical endpoints. The endpoint positions have relative sign (−1)n(-1)^n: odd nn places them at opposite ends of the segment, while even nn places them at the same geometric end. Coincident points remain distinct points of the parametrized string.

4. Compare open and folded closed strings fairly

Section titled “4. Compare open and folded closed strings fairly”

For the first-harmonic closed embedding on 0≤σ<2π0\leq\sigma<2\pi, compute its spatial momentum, physical length, energy, and angular momentum. Compare the open and closed solutions first at equal half-length AA, and then at equal total energy. Explain why the latter comparison produces a half slope even though the two strings have the same tension.

Solution

The integral of cos⁡σ\cos\sigma over the circle vanishes, so the closed solution also has P=0\mathbf P=0. Its length is

Lc=A∫02π∣sin⁡σ∣ dσ=4A.L_c=A\int_0^{2\pi}|\sin\sigma|\,d\sigma=4A.

The integrals of 11 and cos⁡2σ\cos^2\sigma give

Ec=2πTA,Jc=πTA2.E_c=2\pi TA, \qquad J_c=\pi TA^2.

At equal AA, the closed string has twice the length, energy, and spin of the open solution. This does not mean twice the spin at fixed energy: the energy also doubled.

For equal energies, let AoA_o and AcA_c denote the open and closed half-lengths. Then Ac=Ao/2A_c=A_o/2, and

Lc=4Ac=2Ao=Lo,Ωc=2Ωo,Jc=12Jo.L_c=4A_c=2A_o=L_o, \qquad \Omega_c=2\Omega_o, \qquad J_c=\frac12J_o.

Both have the same counted length and tension, but the closed string covers a smaller segment twice. Eliminating its own radius and energy gives Jc=Ec2/(4πT)=α′Ec2/2J_c=E_c^2/(4\pi T)=\alpha'E_c^2/2. The folds carry no separate point masses and are not endpoints at which a boundary condition must be imposed.

In at least four target dimensions, boost the first open solution with speed β\beta along X3X^3, perpendicular to its rotation plane. Use the convention

X~0=γ(X0+βX3),X~3=γ(X3+βX0),γ=(1−β2)−1/2.\widetilde X^0=\gamma(X^0+\beta X^3), \qquad \widetilde X^3=\gamma(X^3+\beta X^0), \qquad \gamma=(1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}.

Compute the boosted energy, momentum, angular velocity, and endpoint speed. Which mass variable belongs in the Regge relation?

Solution

Since the unboosted X3X^3 is zero,

X~0=γAτ,X~3=γβAτ,\widetilde X^0=\gamma A\tau, \qquad \widetilde X^3=\gamma\beta A\tau,

while X1,X2X^1,X^2 retain their original expressions. Integrating their time derivatives gives

E~=γE,P~3=γβE,P~1=P~2=0.\widetilde E=\gamma E, \qquad \widetilde P^3=\gamma\beta E, \qquad \widetilde P^1=\widetilde P^2=0.

The 1212 angular-momentum integrand is unchanged, so J~12=J12\widetilde J^{12}=J^{12}. At fixed σ\sigma, the phase evolves with

Ω~=1γA.\widetilde\Omega=\frac1{\gamma A}.

The transverse speed is ∣cos⁡σ∣/γ|\cos\sigma|/\gamma and the longitudinal speed is β\beta. Therefore

∣v~∣2=β2+(1−β2)cos⁡2σ.|\widetilde{\mathbf v}|^2 =\beta^2+(1-\beta^2)\cos^2\sigma.

At the endpoints this is one, as required by Lorentz invariance; at the center it is β2\beta^2. Finally,

M2=E~2−(P~3)2=E2,J~12=α′M2.M^2=\widetilde E^2-(\widetilde P^3)^2=E^2, \qquad \widetilde J^{12}=\alpha'M^2.

Replacing M2M^2 by the boosted energy squared would give an incorrect factor γ2\gamma^2. Choosing a boost perpendicular to the rotation plane makes J12J^{12} unchanged; a generic boost also mixes angular-momentum and boost-generator components.

6. The sharp bound on arbitrary coordinate intervals

Section titled “6. The sharp bound on arbitrary coordinate intervals”

Repeat the maximum-spin argument for an open string on a dimensionless interval 0≤σ≤ℓ0\leq\sigma\leq\ell, and for a closed string of coordinate period ℓ\ell. Work in temporal conformal gauge and in the center-of-mass frame. Derive the sharp constants and describe the equality profiles. Does changing the coordinate interval change the physical Regge slope?

Solution

In either case, E=TℓκE=T\ell\kappa and the integrated constraint is

∥x˙∥2+∥x′∥2=ℓκ2.\|\dot{\mathbf x}\|^2+\|\mathbf x'\|^2=\ell\kappa^2.

For a mean-zero Neumann profile, the smallest nonzero wave number is π/ℓ\pi/\ell. Hence

∥f∥≤ℓπ∥f′∥.\|f\|\leq\frac{\ell}{\pi}\|f'\|.

The same Cauchy–Schwarz and arithmetic–geometric mean steps give

∣J12∣≤Tℓπ∥x′∥ ∥x˙∥≤Tℓ2κ22π=E22πT.|J^{12}|\leq\frac{T\ell}{\pi}\|\mathbf x'\|\,\|\dot{\mathbf x}\| \leq\frac{T\ell^2\kappa^2}{2\pi} =\frac{E^2}{2\pi T}.

Equality selects x=acos⁡(πσ/ℓ)\mathbf x=\mathbf a\cos(\pi\sigma/\ell) and circular time evolution of coordinate frequency π/ℓ\pi/\ell. The amplitude is ∣a∣=κℓ/π|\mathbf a|=\kappa\ell/\pi. Thus the open-string slope is independent of the coordinate interval.

For a mean-zero periodic profile, the smallest nonzero wave number is 2π/ℓ2\pi/\ell, so

∥f∥≤ℓ2π∥f′∥,∣J12∣≤E24πT.\|f\|\leq\frac{\ell}{2\pi}\|f'\|, \qquad |J^{12}|\leq\frac{E^2}{4\pi T}.

To characterize equality, let k=2π/ℓk=2\pi/\ell. The first-harmonic profile is x=acos⁡kσ+bsin⁡kσ\mathbf x=\mathbf a\cos k\sigma+\mathbf b\sin k\sigma, and Cauchy–Schwarz requires x˙=±kRx\dot{\mathbf x}=\pm kR\mathbf x in the chosen plane. The other local constraint now matters:

x˙⋅x′=±k2det⁡(a,b)=0.\dot{\mathbf x}\cdot\mathbf x' =\pm k^2\det(\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=0.

Therefore a\mathbf a and b\mathbf b are parallel. A shift of the periodic coordinate combines them into x=a0cos⁡kσ\mathbf x=\mathbf a_0\cos k\sigma, with ∣a0∣=κ/k|\mathbf a_0|=\kappa/k. Its circular time evolution is the folded rotating segment. The bound is attained in the class that allows these smooth Polyakov embeddings with folds. If nondegeneracy of the induced metric everywhere is required, this saturating folded solution is excluded.

The ratio of the two sharp constants comes from the first nonzero Neumann and periodic wave numbers for the same coordinate length. Both results are expressed entirely in physical EE and TT after ℓ\ell cancels.

  • Goddard, Peter, Jeffrey Goldstone, Claudio Rebbi, and Charles B. Thorn. “Quantum Dynamics of a Massless Relativistic String.” Nuclear Physics B 56 (1973), 109–135. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90223-X. Classical constrained-string mechanics, quantization, and Lorentz consistency.
  • Tong, David. Lectures on String Theory. University of Cambridge Part III lecture notes, 2009; revised 2012. arXiv:0908.0333, especially sections 1.3, 2.3, and 3.1.3 on classical constraints and free-string Regge trajectories.