Skip to content

Relativistic Particles, Branes, and the Birth of the String

A relativistic particle traces a curve through spacetime; a string traces a surface. Requiring the action to depend on that geometry, rather than on the coordinates used to describe it, leads to reparametrization symmetry and constraints. It also explains why a nearly straight string oscillates in transverse directions.

We will follow this argument from the particle action to the Nambu–Goto action, then quantize the small oscillations of a long string. For a string with fixed endpoints and only transverse massless modes, the result is

E(L)=TL+μ−π(D−2)24L+o(L−1).E(L)=T L+\mu-\frac{\pi(D-2)}{24L}+o(L^{-1}).

The linear term measures the tension. The negative inverse-length term is a quantum effect that depends on the massless fields and their boundary conditions. Deriving it will distinguish a fundamental string from a string used as an effective description of a confining flux tube.

The calculations use the shared spacetime and worldsheet conventions. We begin with classical geometry and a free scalar propagator; spin, worldsheet fermions, and the conditions for a complete quantum string theory enter later.

The relativistic particle and its constraint

Section titled “The relativistic particle and its constraint”

Let Xμ(τ)X^\mu(\tau) describe a timelike curve in a spacetime with metric Gμν(X)G_{\mu\nu}(X). A dot denotes a derivative with respect to its arbitrary parameter τ\tau. The elapsed proper time along the curve is

dℓ=dτ−X˙2,X˙2=Gμν(X)X˙μX˙ν<0.d\ell=d\tau\sqrt{-\dot X^2}, \qquad \dot X^2=G_{\mu\nu}(X)\dot X^\mu\dot X^\nu<0.

The geometrical action for a particle of mass m>0m>0 is

Spp=−m∫dℓ=−m∫dτ−X˙2.S_{\rm pp}=-m\int d\ell =-m\int d\tau\sqrt{-\dot X^2}.

Under an orientation-preserving change τ→τ~=f(τ)\tau\to\widetilde\tau=f(\tau), the velocity acquires the inverse Jacobian and dτd\tau acquires the Jacobian. Their product in dℓd\ell is unchanged. Different parametrizations describe the same spacetime curve.

In flat spacetime, choose X0=tX^0=t temporarily. Then

Spp=−m∫dt 1−v2=∫dt[−m+m2v2+O(v4)].S_{\rm pp}=-m\int dt\,\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2} =\int dt\left[-m+\frac m2\mathbf v^2+O(\mathbf v^4)\right].

The usual nonrelativistic kinetic energy appears after the constant rest-energy term. This check fixes the sign of the relativistic action.

Before making that gauge choice, the canonical momentum is

pμ=mGμνX˙ν−X˙2.p_\mu=\frac{mG_{\mu\nu}\dot X^\nu}{\sqrt{-\dot X^2}}.

Contracting with the inverse spacetime metric gives

Gμνpμpν=−m2.G^{\mu\nu}p_\mu p_\nu=-m^2.

Thus the momenta cannot be chosen independently: they obey the mass-shell constraint. In flat spacetime, the future-directed branch has p0=p2+m2p^0=\sqrt{\mathbf p^2+m^2}, while p0=−p0p_0=-p^0.

The canonical Hamiltonian computed from the reparametrization-invariant Lagrangian vanishes:

Hcan=pμX˙μ−L=mX˙2−X˙2+m−X˙2=0.H_{\rm can}=p_\mu\dot X^\mu-L =\frac{m\dot X^2}{\sqrt{-\dot X^2}} +m\sqrt{-\dot X^2}=0.

This does not mean that the particle has zero energy. HcanH_{\rm can} generates evolution in the redundant parameter τ\tau. Once X0=tX^0=t is used as a physical clock and the constraint is solved, the Hamiltonian is the nonzero energy p2+m2\sqrt{\mathbf p^2+m^2}; exercise 1 derives it. The distinction between a gauge generator and a physical energy will recur for strings. For a further treatment of the classical particle and string actions, see Tong, section 1.

Introduce an auxiliary worldline field e(τ)e(\tau), the einbein, and replace the square root by

S[X,e]=12∫dτ(e−1GμνX˙μX˙ν−em2).S[X,e]=\frac12\int d\tau \left(e^{-1}G_{\mu\nu}\dot X^\mu\dot X^\nu-em^2\right).

Under a reparametrization, XμX^\mu is a scalar and e dτe\,d\tau is invariant:

X~μ(τ~)=Xμ(τ),e~(τ~)=e(τ)dτdτ~.\widetilde X^\mu(\widetilde\tau)=X^\mu(\tau), \qquad \widetilde e(\widetilde\tau) =e(\tau)\frac{d\tau}{d\widetilde\tau}.

Both terms in the action are consequently invariant. There are no derivatives of ee, so its equation is a constraint rather than an independent propagation equation:

δSδe=−X˙22e2−m22=0.\frac{\delta S}{\delta e} =-\frac{\dot X^2}{2e^2}-\frac{m^2}{2}=0.

For m>0m>0, choose the positive-einbein branch. It gives

e=−X˙2m,S[X,ecl]=−m∫dτ−X˙2.e=\frac{\sqrt{-\dot X^2}}m, \qquad S[X,e_{\rm cl}]=-m\int d\tau\sqrt{-\dot X^2}.

The condition e>0e>0 selects the sign of the worldline lapse and the orientation of its invariant parameter. It does not impose a future-directed spacetime trajectory: that is a separate condition on X˙0\dot X^0. For example, reversing the time direction of a timelike curve leaves X˙2\dot X^2 and the positive solution for ee unchanged.

The einbein action also has a well-defined massless limit:

Sm=0=12∫dτ e−1X˙2.S_{m=0}=\frac12\int d\tau\,e^{-1}\dot X^2.

Its equations in flat spacetime are

X˙2=0,ddτ(e−1X˙μ)=0.\dot X^2=0, \qquad \frac d{d\tau}\left(e^{-1}\dot X^\mu\right)=0.

For constant ee, the solution is a straight null line with constant momentum pμ=e−1X˙μp^\mu=e^{-1}\dot X^\mu. The equation for ee now constrains the trajectory without determining ee in terms of XX. Substituting m=0m=0 directly into −m∫dℓ-m\int d\ell would instead erase the variational problem. Nor may one eliminate ee using the massive formula, which divides by mm.

A useful form that treats the two masses uniformly is

S[X,p,e]=∫dτ[pμX˙μ−e2(Gμνpμpν+m2)].S[X,p,e] =\int d\tau\left[ p_\mu\dot X^\mu-\frac e2\left(G^{\mu\nu}p_\mu p_\nu+m^2\right) \right].

Varying pμp_\mu gives X˙μ=eGμνpν\dot X^\mu=eG^{\mu\nu}p_\nu and recovers the einbein action. Varying ee imposes the mass shell directly. The Hamiltonian is a multiple of that constraint.

The worldline modulus and the scalar propagator

Section titled “The worldline modulus and the scalar propagator”

For an open worldline with fixed endpoints, use a dimensionless parameter 0≤τ≤10\leq\tau\leq1. Since XμX^\mu has dimension length, the einbein action requires

[e]=L2,T=∫01dτ e(τ),[T]=L2.[e]=L^2, \qquad \mathcal T=\int_0^1d\tau\,e(\tau), \qquad [\mathcal T]=L^2.

The positive number T\mathcal T is invariant under reparametrizations that preserve the endpoints. It cannot be gauged away. Indeed, the coordinate change

τ~=1T∫0τdu e(u)\widetilde\tau =\frac1{\mathcal T}\int_0^\tau du\,e(u)

sets e~=T\widetilde e=\mathcal T on the same unit interval. Thus the local einbein fluctuations are gauge freedom, while T\mathcal T remains as one ordinary integration variable.

The name proper-time parameter requires care. On a classical massive trajectory, dℓ=me dτd\ell=me\,d\tau, so the elapsed spacetime proper time is ℓ=mT\ell=m\mathcal T. The modulus T\mathcal T itself has dimension length squared, and it remains useful for a massless particle, whose elapsed proper time along a null trajectory is zero.

Fixing the normalization and the Feynman sign

Section titled “Fixing the normalization and the Feynman sign”

Let

GF(xf−xi)=⟨0∣T{χ(xf)χ(xi)}∣0⟩G_F(x_f-x_i) =\langle0|{\rm T}\{\chi(x_f)\chi(x_i)\}|0\rangle

be the time-ordered two-point function of a canonically normalized free real scalar χ\chi. With the shared mostly-plus signature and the action −12∫[(∂χ)2+m2χ2]-\tfrac12\int[(\partial\chi)^2+m^2\chi^2], its momentum-space expression is

GF(p)=−ip2+m2−i0.G_F(p)=\frac{-i}{p^2+m^2-i0}.

It satisfies (□−m2)GF(x)=iδ(D)(x)(\Box-m^2)G_F(x)=i\delta^{(D)}(x). Specifying the time-ordered correlator matters: an inverse differential operator defined without the Feynman factor of ii is a different quantity.

At fixed T\mathcal T, the first-order particle action gives the kernel

K(T;Δx)=⟨xf∣e−iT(p^2+m2−i0)/2∣xi⟩=∫dDp(2π)D eip⋅Δxe−iT(p2+m2−i0)/2,Δx=xf−xi.\begin{aligned} K(\mathcal T;\Delta x) &=\left\langle x_f\left| e^{-i\mathcal T(\hat p^2+m^2-i0)/2} \right|x_i\right\rangle\\ &=\int\frac{d^Dp}{(2\pi)^D}\, e^{ip\cdot\Delta x} e^{-i\mathcal T(p^2+m^2-i0)/2}, \qquad \Delta x=x_f-x_i. \end{aligned}

Its normalization is fixed by K(0;Δx)=δ(D)(Δx)K(0;\Delta x)=\delta^{(D)}(\Delta x). Integrating out the momenta gives the equivalent position path integral with exponent

iST[X]=i2∫01dτ(T−1X˙2−Tm2).iS_{\mathcal T}[X] =\frac i2\int_0^1d\tau \left(\mathcal T^{-1}\dot X^2-\mathcal T m^2\right).

The path-integral measure is understood with the kernel normalization just stated. To obtain the propagator, integrate over the modulus:

GF(Δx)=12∫0∞dT K(T;Δx).G_F(\Delta x)=\frac12\int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\, K(\mathcal T;\Delta x).

The factor 1/21/2 is required by the factor 1/21/2 in the worldline Hamiltonian. It can be absorbed by defining s=T/2s=\mathcal T/2, but it cannot simply be omitted. At fixed momentum the calculation is elementary:

12∫0∞dT e−iT(A−iε)/2=1ε+iA=−iA−iε,A=p2+m2.\frac12\int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\, e^{-i\mathcal T(A-i\varepsilon)/2} =\frac1{\varepsilon+iA} =\frac{-i}{A-i\varepsilon}, \qquad A=p^2+m^2.

Taking ε→0+\varepsilon\to0^+ yields the Feynman prescription. A symbolic expression ∫DX De/Diff\int \mathcal DX\,\mathcal De/{\rm Diff} does not by itself fix this overall normalization.

The propagator path integral sums over off-shell paths; it is not restricted to classical, future-directed timelike curves. Its causal prescription comes from the integration contour and the i0i0, rather than from assigning every path a monotonic target-space time.

The convergent Euclidean counterpart makes the Gaussian normalization particularly transparent:

KE(T;ΔxE)=1(2πT)D/2exp⁡[−ΔxE22T−m2T2].K_E(\mathcal T;\Delta x_E) =\frac1{(2\pi\mathcal T)^{D/2}} \exp\left[-\frac{\Delta x_E^2}{2\mathcal T} -\frac{m^2\mathcal T}{2}\right].

The Fourier transform is e−T(pE2+m2)/2e^{-\mathcal T(p_E^2+m^2)/2}, so

GE(ΔxE)=12∫0∞dT KE,GE(pE)=1pE2+m2.G_E(\Delta x_E)=\frac12\int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\,K_E, \qquad G_E(p_E)=\frac1{p_E^2+m^2}.

Equivalently, s=T/2s=\mathcal T/2 gives the familiar kernel (4πs)−D/2e−ΔxE2/(4s)−m2s(4\pi s)^{-D/2}e^{-\Delta x_E^2/(4s)-m^2s}. This is the Schwinger parameter representation of the inverse Klein–Gordon operator. It concerns a propagator between two fixed endpoints; closed worldline loops have an additional residual symmetry and a different modulus measure. The worldline method and its relation to field-theory amplitudes are developed in Schubert’s review.

The string generalization will replace a one-dimensional metric by a two-dimensional metric. Gauge fixing will again leave global geometric parameters, now the moduli of a worldsheet.

A pp-brane has pp spatial dimensions. Its history is a (p+1)(p+1)-dimensional worldvolume with local coordinates σα\sigma^\alpha, α=0,…,p\alpha=0,\ldots,p, embedded by Xμ(σ)X^\mu(\sigma). A tangent displacement on the brane maps to

dXμ=∂αXμ dσα.dX^\mu=\partial_\alpha X^\mu\,d\sigma^\alpha.

Its spacetime squared interval is therefore

GμνdXμdXν=hαβdσαdσβ,hαβ=Gμν(X)∂αXμ∂βXν.G_{\mu\nu}dX^\mu dX^\nu =h_{\alpha\beta}d\sigma^\alpha d\sigma^\beta, \qquad h_{\alpha\beta} =G_{\mu\nu}(X)\partial_\alpha X^\mu\partial_\beta X^\nu.

This defines the induced metric. It is determined by the embedding; it is not an independent field. For a nondegenerate timelike worldvolume, it has one negative eigenvalue and det⁡h<0\det h<0. The geometric action is

Sp=−Tp∫dp+1σ −det⁡h.S_p=-\mathcal T_p\int d^{p+1}\sigma\,\sqrt{-\det h}.

Here Tp\mathcal T_p denotes a generic brane tension. A generic pp-brane need not be a Dpp-brane; identifying it as a D-brane would add the charge and tension relations in the overview, as well as worldvolume fields absent from this purely geometric action.

To identify the coefficient, take a flat, static brane of spatial volume VpV_p and use its spacetime coordinates as worldvolume coordinates. Then hαβ=ηαβh_{\alpha\beta}=\eta_{\alpha\beta} and

Sp=−TpVp∫dt.S_p=-\mathcal T_pV_p\int dt.

Its energy is TpVp\mathcal T_pV_p, so Tp\mathcal T_p is energy per unit spatial volume and has mass dimension p+1p+1.

ObjectSpatial dimensionHistoryGeometric coefficient
Particlep=0p=0WorldlineT0=m\mathcal T_0=m
Stringp=1p=1WorldsheetT1=T\mathcal T_1=T
Membranep=2p=2Three-dimensional worldvolumeT2\mathcal T_2

A particle, string, and membrane sweep out worldvolumes of dimensions one, two, and three

Time evolution adds one dimension: a spatial pp-brane sweeps out a (p+1)(p+1)-dimensional worldvolume. The drawings are schematic embeddings, not additional target-space dimensions assigned to the objects.

The bosonic area term for a fundamental string has T=TF1=1/(2πα′)T=T_{\rm F1}=1/(2\pi\alpha'). Thus [T]=L−2[T]=L^{-2}, with the string length ℓs=α′\ell_s=\sqrt{\alpha'}. Gauge fields on D-branes, string couplings to background form fields, and fermions require additional action terms. Reparametrization invariance permits such terms; it does not uniquely determine a complete microscopic theory.

For a string, use coordinates (τ,σ)(\tau,\sigma) and write X′=∂σXX'=\partial_\sigma X. In flat spacetime the induced metric is

hab=(X˙2X˙⋅X′X˙⋅X′X′2),h_{ab}= \begin{pmatrix} \dot X^2 & \dot X\cdot X'\\ \dot X\cdot X' & X'^2 \end{pmatrix},

so its determinant gives

−det⁡h=(X˙⋅X′)2−X˙2X′2.-\det h=(\dot X\cdot X')^2-\dot X^2X'^2.

The Nambu–Goto action is consequently

SNG=−T∫dτ dσ (X˙⋅X′)2−X˙2X′2.S_{\rm NG} =-T\int d\tau\,d\sigma\, \sqrt{(\dot X\cdot X')^2-\dot X^2X'^2}.

It is invariant under target-space Poincaré transformations and under changes of the two worldsheet coordinates. The latter relabel the same embedded surface; they do not generate a new physical string configuration.

The equations describe a stationary worldsheet area. In Lorentzian signature, “stationary” is more precise than asserting that every solution is a minimum. To obtain the equations in flat spacetime, use

δ−h=12−h habδhab,δhab=2∂(aXμ∂b)δXμ.\delta\sqrt{-h} =\frac12\sqrt{-h}\,h^{ab}\delta h_{ab}, \qquad \delta h_{ab}=2\partial_{(a}X_\mu\partial_{b)}\delta X^\mu.

After integration by parts, the bulk variation vanishes when

∂a(−h hab∂bXμ)=0.\partial_a\left(\sqrt{-h}\,h^{ab}\partial_bX^\mu\right)=0.

This is nonlinear because the metric in the equation itself depends on XX. The next page introduces an independent auxiliary metric and the Polyakov action to organize these equations and their constraints.

An open string has an interval as its spatial parameter space, with two endpoints. A closed string has a circle and no spatial endpoints. With the standard closed-string period,

Xμ(τ,σ+2π)=Xμ(τ,σ)X^\mu(\tau,\sigma+2\pi)=X^\mu(\tau,\sigma)

in noncompact target directions. If a direction is a circle of radius RcR_c, the corresponding coordinate may instead differ by 2πwRc2\pi wR_c, where the integer ww is winding number.

An open string traces a strip with two spatial boundaries while a closed string traces a cylinder

The strip and cylinder distinguish an interval from a periodic spatial coordinate. Their coordinate widths are not physical string lengths. A finite segment of either history can also have initial and final time slices.

Varying the open-string action also produces an endpoint term. Define the worldsheet momentum current

P μa=−T−h hab∂bXμ.\mathcal P^a_{\ \mu} =-T\sqrt{-h}\,h^{ab}\partial_bX_\mu.

At the two spatial boundaries, the variational principle requires

P μσ δXμ∣σleftσright=0.\left.\mathcal P^\sigma_{\ \mu}\,\delta X^\mu \right|_{\sigma_{\rm left}}^{\sigma_{\rm right}}=0.

An endpoint coordinate held fixed has δXμ=0\delta X^\mu=0 there: a Dirichlet condition. A freely varied coordinate instead requires the corresponding momentum flux P μσ\mathcal P^\sigma_{\ \mu} to vanish: a Neumann condition. In conformal coordinates this becomes X′μ=0X'^\mu=0 in the freely varied directions. Endpoint constraints supplied by D-branes will later give these boundary conditions a dynamical interpretation.

For a closed string, the spatial boundary contributions cancel by periodicity. Neither the open-string interval nor the closed-string period fixes the physical length: that length is determined by the embedding and its induced metric.

Consider a nearly straight string between prescribed endpoints separated by LL in the X1X^1 direction. A convenient local coordinate choice is

X0=t,X1=x,Xi=Yi(t,x),0≤x≤L,i=2,…,D−1.X^0=t,\qquad X^1=x,\qquad X^i=Y^i(t,x),\qquad 0\leq x\leq L,\quad i=2,\ldots,D-1.

Here tt and xx are length-valued spacetime coordinates used on the worldsheet, rather than the dimensionless coordinates used for oscillator expansions. This choice is possible where the projection onto (X0,X1)(X^0,X^1) is nonsingular and the string can be represented as a graph. A folded string may require another gauge or several coordinate patches.

Dots and primes in this section mean ∂t\partial_t and ∂x\partial_x. Substituting into the induced metric gives

hab=(−1+Y˙2Y˙⋅Y′Y˙⋅Y′1+Y′2),h_{ab}= \begin{pmatrix} -1+\dot Y^2 & \dot Y\cdot Y'\\ \dot Y\cdot Y' & 1+Y'^2 \end{pmatrix},

where the products sum over transverse components. Hence

−det⁡h=(1−Y˙2)(1+Y′2)+(Y˙⋅Y′)2.-\det h =(1-\dot Y^2)(1+Y'^2)+(\dot Y\cdot Y')^2.

For small slopes and velocities, ∣Y′∣,∣Y˙∣≪1\lvert Y'\rvert,\lvert\dot Y\rvert\ll1,

−h=1+12(Y′2−Y˙2)+O((∂Y)4).\sqrt{-h} =1+\frac12(Y'^2-\dot Y^2)+O((\partial Y)^4).

The corresponding action is

SNG=−TL∫dt+T2∫dt∫0Ldx (Y˙2−Y′2)+O ⁣(T∫d2x (∂Y)4).S_{\rm NG} =-TL\int dt +\frac T2\int dt\int_0^Ldx\, \left(\dot Y^2-Y'^2\right) +O\!\left(T\int d^2x\,(\partial Y)^4\right).

The quadratic equations are wave equations,

(∂t2−∂x2)Yi=0.(\partial_t^2-\partial_x^2)Y^i=0.

The positive kinetic energy and equal time- and space-derivative coefficients show that small transverse waves propagate at the target-space speed of light. The constant term yields the positive classical energy TLTL.

A stretched string is described in static gauge by transverse displacements above its straight reference configuration

At a fixed target-space time, x=X1x=X^1 labels the longitudinal position and Yi(t,x)Y^i(t,x) changes the string’s transverse shape. For fixed endpoints, Yi(t,0)=Yi(t,L)=0Y^i(t,0)=Y^i(t,L)=0. The displacement is schematic and need not have the same plotting scale as xx.

There are DD embedding fields and two coordinate freedoms, leaving D−2D-2 local transverse fields in this gauge. A tangential change of an embedding is a coordinate change; a normal displacement changes its shape. For a flat pp-brane, the same count gives D−(p+1)D-(p+1) transverse embedding fields. This counts only the geometric sector, not any additional gauge, internal, or fermionic fields.

Transverse translations act by constant shifts of YiY^i. The absence of a mass term reflects this symmetry: the fields describe the low-energy fluctuations associated with the broken transverse translations of a straight brane. For a finite string, fixed endpoints constrain these shifts and remove the constant mode, while leaving the same bulk wave equation.

Canonical fields are

yi=T Yi,S2=12∫dt dx (y˙2−y′2).y^i=\sqrt T\,Y^i, \qquad S_2=\frac12\int dt\,dx\,(\dot y^2-y'^2).

They have mass dimension zero in two dimensions. The first interaction, obtained by expanding the determinant one order further, is

L4=18T[(y˙2+y′2)2−4(y˙⋅y′)2].\mathcal L_4 =\frac1{8T}\left[ (\dot y^2+y'^2)^2-4(\dot y\cdot y')^2 \right].

Thus scattering corrections at momentum scale kk are organized by k2/Tk^2/T, as well as by any other microscopic mass scale in an effective string. For wavelengths comparable to LL, the long-string expansion requires TL2≫1TL^2\gg1. A small-amplitude expansion and a long-wavelength expansion are related here, but neither licenses extrapolation of the truncated action to arbitrary slopes or energies.

Long confining strings and the Lüscher term

Section titled “Long confining strings and the Lüscher term”

In a confining gauge theory, external heavy sources can be connected by a flux tube with an energy proportional to their separation. At distances large compared with its thickness, a stable flux tube admits a string description. Its tension TconfT_{\rm conf} is a property of the gauge theory; it need not be the tension of a fundamental string in flat spacetime.

For the following calculation, assume zero temperature, a straight long tube with fixed endpoints, a gap to additional bulk and worldsheet excitations, and exactly D−2D-2 massless transverse bosons with relativistic propagation. String breaking must be absent or negligible in the range of separations considered. These assumptions justify retaining the quadratic worldsheet fields. They are explicit in the modern treatment of long open strings by Aharony and Field.

Dirichlet endpoints give the normalized mode expansion

yi(t,x)=2L∑n=1∞qni(t)sin⁡πnxL.y^i(t,x)=\sqrt{\frac2L}\sum_{n=1}^\infty q_n^i(t) \sin\frac{\pi nx}{L}.

Orthogonality on [0,L][0,L] reduces the action to independent oscillators:

S2=12∑i=2D−1∑n=1∞∫dt[(q˙ni)2−ωn2(qni)2],ωn=πnL.S_2=\frac12\sum_{i=2}^{D-1}\sum_{n=1}^\infty \int dt\left[(\dot q_n^i)^2-\omega_n^2(q_n^i)^2\right], \qquad \omega_n=\frac{\pi n}{L}.

There is one real oscillator per nn and per transverse direction. Its zero-point energy is ωn/2\omega_n/2, so the unrenormalized sum is

Ezp=π(D−2)2L∑n=1∞n.E_{\rm zp}=\frac{\pi(D-2)}{2L}\sum_{n=1}^\infty n.

The sum diverges. To separate its local ultraviolet contribution from its finite dependence on LL, introduce a regulator δ>0\delta>0 of dimension length and damp each mode by e−δωne^{-\delta\omega_n}. With a=πδ/La=\pi\delta/L,

∑n=1∞ne−an=e−a(1−e−a)2=1a2−112+O(a2).\sum_{n=1}^\infty ne^{-an} =\frac{e^{-a}}{(1-e^{-a})^2} =\frac1{a^2}-\frac1{12}+O(a^2).

It follows that

Ezp(δ)=(D−2)L2πδ2−π(D−2)24L+O ⁣(δ2L3).E_{\rm zp}(\delta) =\frac{(D-2)L}{2\pi\delta^2} -\frac{\pi(D-2)}{24L} +O\!\left(\frac{\delta^2}{L^3}\right).

The divergent term is proportional to length and renormalizes the tension. Endpoint self-energies can contribute a constant μ\mu. The remaining inverse-length term gives

V(L)=TconfL+μ−π(D−2)24L+o(L−1).V(L)=T_{\rm conf}L+\mu -\frac{\pi(D-2)}{24L} +o(L^{-1}).

This is the Lüscher term, first obtained in the effective-string analysis of Lüscher, Symanzik, and Weisz. Zeta-function regularization gives the same finite term by the analytic continuation ζ(−1)=−1/12\zeta(-1)=-1/12; it does not make the ordinary sum of positive integers converge.

In four spacetime dimensions the correction is −π/(12L)-\pi/(12L). Its contribution to the force −dV/dL-dV/dL is attractive, −π/(12L2)-\pi/(12L^2). The coefficient does not depend on TconfT_{\rm conf} because the canonically normalized small-wave frequencies are set by LL. Interactions generate smaller corrections, and a detailed expansion requires the allowed bulk and boundary operators.

Universality here has definite limits. Extra light internal modes or fermions can change the vacuum energy; periodic or mixed endpoint conditions change the mode sum. A fundamental superstring therefore does not automatically have the bosonic flux-tube coefficient. The effective long-string result also does not require D=26D=26: the critical dimension concerns a complete fundamental bosonic string, whereas this calculation is a low-energy expansion around a long string in a specified spacetime.

The worldline modulus is not an elapsed clock time. On a unit parameter interval, T=∫e\mathcal T=\int e has dimension length squared. Only on a massive classical solution is the elapsed proper time mTm\mathcal T.

A vanishing canonical Hamiltonian is not zero physical energy. Reparametrization invariance introduces a constraint. Choosing a spacetime clock and solving the constraint produces the physical Hamiltonian.

Static gauge is a local description. It describes transverse displacements where the embedding is a graph. It need not cover folds, degenerations, or every classical solution in one coordinate patch.

The Lüscher coefficient counts modes and boundary conditions. Its familiar value assumes only the transverse bosons with fixed endpoints. It is not a universal answer for every theory called a string theory.

1. Recover the physical particle Hamiltonian

Section titled “1. Recover the physical particle Hamiltonian”

In flat spacetime, begin with the first-order einbein action and impose X0=tX^0=t. Solve the constraint on the positive-energy branch and derive the reduced action and Hamiltonian. Explain why the result is compatible with Hcan=0H_{\rm can}=0 before gauge fixing.

Solution

The flat-space constraint is −p02+p2+m2=0-p_0^2+\mathbf p^2+m^2=0. Positive energy means p0=−p0>0p^0=-p_0>0, so

p0=−Ep,Ep=p2+m2.p_0=-E_{\mathbf p}, \qquad E_{\mathbf p}=\sqrt{\mathbf p^2+m^2}.

In the first-order action, pμdXμ=p0dt+p⋅dXp_\mu dX^\mu=p_0dt+\mathbf p\cdot d\mathbf X. The constraint term vanishes after solving it, leaving

Sred=∫dt[p⋅dXdt−Ep].S_{\rm red}=\int dt\left[ \mathbf p\cdot\frac{d\mathbf X}{dt}-E_{\mathbf p} \right].

Thus Hphys=EpH_{\rm phys}=E_{\mathbf p}. Its velocity equation is v=∂Ep/∂p=p/Ep\mathbf v=\partial E_{\mathbf p}/\partial\mathbf p=\mathbf p/E_{\mathbf p}. Eliminating p\mathbf p gives E=m/1−v2E=m/\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2} and Lred=−m1−v2L_{\rm red}=-m\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2}.

The original vanishing Hamiltonian concerned changes of the arbitrary label on the worldline. The reduced Hamiltonian concerns changes of target-space time. These are different generators. The same reduction for m=0m=0 gives Hphys=∣p∣H_{\rm phys}=|\mathbf p| for a nonzero null momentum.

2. Fix the einbein without removing its modulus

Section titled “2. Fix the einbein without removing its modulus”

On 0≤τ≤10\leq\tau\leq1, take e(τ)=e0(1+bτ)e(\tau)=e_0(1+b\tau) with e0>0e_0>0 and b>−1b>-1. Find the endpoint-preserving coordinate transformation that makes the einbein constant. Check its dimensions and explain what changes in the relation to proper time when m=0m=0.

Solution

The invariant modulus is

T=∫01e(τ)dτ=e0(1+b2).\mathcal T=\int_0^1e(\tau)d\tau=e_0\left(1+\frac b2\right).

The required new coordinate is

τ~=τ+bτ2/21+b/2.\widetilde\tau =\frac{\tau+b\tau^2/2}{1+b/2}.

It takes 00 to 00 and 11 to 11, and its derivative is (1+bτ)/(1+b/2)>0(1+b\tau)/(1+b/2)>0. The density transformation law gives

e~=e0(1+bτ)dτdτ~=e0(1+b2)=T.\widetilde e =e_0(1+b\tau)\frac{d\tau}{d\widetilde\tau} =e_0\left(1+\frac b2\right)=\mathcal T.

Both coordinates are dimensionless, while e0e_0 and T\mathcal T have dimension L2L^2. A further endpoint-preserving reparametrization cannot change their integral.

For a massive classical solution, the einbein constraint yields ℓ=mT\ell=m\mathcal T. For a massless solution, X˙2=0\dot X^2=0 and ℓ=0\ell=0 even though T>0\mathcal T>0 is an admissible modulus. In constant-einbein gauge, Xμ=Xiμ+Tpμτ~X^\mu=X_i^\mu+\mathcal T p^\mu\widetilde\tau with p2=0p^2=0. The parameter controls an affine description of the null line, rather than a nonzero proper time along it.

3. Evaluate the massless Euclidean propagator

Section titled “3. Evaluate the massless Euclidean propagator”

Using the heat kernel in the text, evaluate GE(r)G_E(r) for m=0m=0, r=∣ΔxE∣>0r=|\Delta x_E|>0, and D>2D>2. Check the four-dimensional coefficient and identify the infrared problem at D=2D=2.

Solution

Start from

GE(r)=12(2π)−D/2∫0∞dT T−D/2e−r2/(2T).G_E(r)=\frac12(2\pi)^{-D/2} \int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\, \mathcal T^{-D/2}e^{-r^2/(2\mathcal T)}.

Set v=r2/(2T)v=r^2/(2\mathcal T). The integral becomes

GE(r)=Γ(D/2−1)4πD/2 r2−D.G_E(r) =\frac{\Gamma(D/2-1)}{4\pi^{D/2}}\, r^{2-D}.

In D=4D=4, this is GE(r)=1/(4π2r2)G_E(r)=1/(4\pi^2r^2). It has dimension L2−DL^{2-D}, as expected for the inverse Laplacian.

For r>0r>0, the radial Laplacian annihilates r2−Dr^{2-D}. The delta-function normalization follows by integrating −∂2GE-\partial^2G_E over a small ball:

−ΩD−1rD−1∂rGE(r)=1,ΩD−1=2πD/2Γ(D/2).-\Omega_{D-1}r^{D-1}\partial_rG_E(r)=1, \qquad \Omega_{D-1}=\frac{2\pi^{D/2}}{\Gamma(D/2)}.

At D=2D=2, the large-T\mathcal T integrand behaves as 1/T1/\mathcal T, producing an infrared divergence. One must supply an infrared scale, a mass, or a subtraction. A subtracted massless Green function has the form −(1/2π)log⁡(r/r0)-(1/2\pi)\log(r/r_0); the arbitrary length r0r_0 reflects the undetermined additive constant.

4. Derive the first transverse interaction

Section titled “4. Derive the first transverse interaction”

Expand the static-gauge determinant through fourth order in first derivatives and obtain the interaction for yi=T Yiy^i=\sqrt T\,Y^i. Test the result on a wave Yi=fi(t−x)Y^i=f^i(t-x) on an infinite string. Does the quartic correction vanish, and is the determinant itself special?

Solution

Let A=Y˙2A=\dot Y^2, B=Y′2B=Y'^2, and C=Y˙⋅Y′C=\dot Y\cdot Y'. Each of A,B,CA,B,C is second order in derivatives. The exact determinant is

−det⁡h=1+B−A+C2−AB.-\det h=1+B-A+C^2-AB.

Using 1+u=1+u/2−u2/8+⋯\sqrt{1+u}=1+u/2-u^2/8+\cdots and keeping fourth-order terms,

−h=1+B−A2+C22−(A+B)28+O((∂Y)6).\sqrt{-h} =1+\frac{B-A}{2} +\frac{C^2}{2}-\frac{(A+B)^2}{8} +O((\partial Y)^6).

Multiplication by −T-T and the rescaling Y=y/TY=y/\sqrt T give

L4=18T[(y˙2+y′2)2−4(y˙⋅y′)2].\mathcal L_4 =\frac1{8T}\left[ (\dot y^2+y'^2)^2-4(\dot y\cdot y')^2 \right].

For Yi=fi(t−x)Y^i=f^i(t-x), write vi=dfi/d(t−x)v^i=df^i/d(t-x). Then Y˙=v\dot Y=v, Y′=−vY'=-v, so A=B=v2A=B=v^2 and C=−v2C=-v^2. The quartic bracket vanishes, and in fact −det⁡h=1-\det h=1 exactly. This is a useful algebraic check on both relative signs. It does not mean that the wave has zero energy: the energy is obtained from the Hamiltonian before imposing the special traveling-wave profile. Such a profile on an infinite string also avoids the fixed-endpoint condition, which would generally reflect it into a wave moving in the other direction.

5. Change the boundary conditions in the Casimir calculation

Section titled “5. Change the boundary conditions in the Casimir calculation”

Compute the finite zero-point energy per real massless scalar for three cases: Dirichlet at both endpoints of an interval of length LL; Dirichlet at one endpoint and Neumann at the other; and a periodic spatial circle of circumference LL. For the last case, interpret the background as a straight string winding a compact target direction. Explain the mode degeneracy and compare with the open-string Lüscher coefficient.

Solution

For Dirichlet–Dirichlet conditions, ωn=πn/L\omega_n=\pi n/L with n≥1n\geq1 and one real sine mode for each nn. Removing the length-proportional divergence gives

EDD=π2Lζ(−1)=−π24L.E_{\rm DD}=\frac{\pi}{2L}\zeta(-1) =-\frac{\pi}{24L}.

For mixed Dirichlet–Neumann conditions, the spatial modes are sin⁡[(n+12)πx/L]\sin[(n+\tfrac12)\pi x/L], with n=0,1,…n=0,1,\ldots. Their regulated sum follows from

∑n=0∞e−a(n+1/2)=12sinh⁡(a/2)=1a−a24+O(a3).\sum_{n=0}^\infty e^{-a(n+1/2)} =\frac1{2\sinh(a/2)} =\frac1a-\frac a{24}+O(a^3).

Taking minus the derivative with respect to aa gives ∑(n+12)e−a(n+1/2)=a−2+1/24+⋯\sum(n+\tfrac12)e^{-a(n+1/2)}=a^{-2}+1/24+\cdots. Its finite part therefore yields

EDN=+π48L.E_{\rm DN}=+\frac{\pi}{48L}.

For a real periodic field, every n≥1n\geq1 has two independent real modes, sine and cosine, with frequency 2πn/L2\pi n/L. The zero-frequency mode has no oscillator zero-point energy. Thus

Eperiodic=2⋅12∑n=1∞2πnL=−π6L.E_{\rm periodic} =2\cdot\frac12\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{2\pi n}{L} =-\frac{\pi}{6L}.

The periodic coefficient is four times the Dirichlet–Dirichlet coefficient: a factor of two from the frequencies and a factor of two from the real-mode degeneracy. Multiplying by D−2D-2 gives the corresponding transverse-boson results. These comparisons show why a count of fields alone is insufficient without their boundary conditions.

A flat brane of coordinate spatial volume VpV_p moves uniformly in one transverse direction, Y=vtY=vt, with ∣v∣<1|v|<1. Use its induced metric to find the Lagrangian, total transverse momentum, and energy. Relate the result to the dimensions and interpretation of Tp\mathcal T_p.

Solution

In static gauge the induced metric is diagonal, with h00=−1+v2h_{00}=-1+v^2 and hij=δijh_{ij}=\delta_{ij} in the spatial worldvolume directions. Hence

L=−TpVp1−v2,PY=TpVp v1−v2.L=-\mathcal T_pV_p\sqrt{1-v^2}, \qquad P_Y=\frac{\mathcal T_pV_p\,v}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}.

The energy is

E=PYv−L=TpVp1−v2,E2−PY2=(TpVp)2.E=P_Yv-L =\frac{\mathcal T_pV_p}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}, \qquad E^2-P_Y^2=(\mathcal T_pV_p)^2.

A uniformly moving flat brane thus has the relativistic inertia of an object with rest energy TpVp\mathcal T_pV_p. Since [Vp]=Lp[V_p]=L^p and energy has dimension L−1L^{-1}, the tension has dimension L−(p+1)L^{-(p+1)}. For p=0p=0, this reduces to the point-particle calculation.

  • Aharony, Ofer, and Matan Field. “On the Effective Theory of Long Open Strings.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2011, no. 1, 065 (2011). arXiv:1008.2636; doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2011)065.
  • Lüscher, Martin, Kurt Symanzik, and Peter Weisz. “Anomalies of the Free Loop Wave Equation in the WKB Approximation.” Nuclear Physics B 173, no. 3, 365–396 (1980). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90009-7.
  • Schubert, Christian. “Perturbative Quantum Field Theory in the String-Inspired Formalism.” Physics Reports 355, 73–234 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0101036; doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00013-8.
  • Tong, David. Lectures on String Theory. University of Cambridge lecture notes (2009; revised 2012), section 1. arXiv:0908.0333.