Skip to content

Radial Quantization and State–Operator Correspondence

A local operator is inserted at a point, whereas a quantum state specifies data on an entire spatial slice. Conformal symmetry connects these descriptions: the infinite past of a cylinder becomes the origin of a plane, and a spatial circle becomes the boundary of a disk. An insertion at the center prepares a state on that boundary.

This page develops that construction, including its normalization, its inner product and its application to free-boson oscillators. It uses the shared conventions and the OPEs and contour generators derived on the preceding page. The representation theory of descendant spaces is developed on the next page.

States on circles and evolution through an annulus

Section titled “States on circles and evolution through an annulus”

On the Euclidean cylinder, a state is specified on a circle of constant τE\tau_E. The map

z=ew=eτE+iσz=e^w=e^{\tau_E+i\sigma}

sends that circle to ∣z∣=eτE|z|=e^{\tau_E}. Increasing Euclidean time means moving outward. Time ordering therefore becomes radial ordering: the insertion at the larger radius acts on the left. The origin and infinity represent the two ends of the cylinder; neither is an ordinary finite-time slice.

Let φ(θ)\varphi(\theta) denote boundary values of the CFT fields on a circle. The path integral over r<∣z∣<Rr<|z|<R defines a kernel between two such boundary configurations:

KR,r[φR,φr]=∫Φ∣R=φRΦ∣r=φrDΦ e−SE[Φ].K_{R,r}[\varphi_R,\varphi_r] = \int_{\substack{\Phi|_R=\varphi_R\\\Phi|_r=\varphi_r}} \mathcal D\Phi\,e^{-S_E[\Phi]}.

Integrating this kernel against an initial wavefunctional gives the state at radius RR. Gluing two annuli means integrating over their common boundary values. It is the path-integral version of composing evolution operators.

The radial time interval is s=log⁡(R/r)s=\log(R/r). With the common vacuum propagation factor divided out, the evolution operator is

UR,r=e−sD,D=L0+Lˉ0.U_{R,r}=e^{-s\mathcal D}, \qquad \mathcal D=L_0+\bar L_0.

An eigenstate of scaling dimension Δ\Delta is multiplied by (R/r)−Δ(R/r)^{-\Delta}. The cylinder Hamiltonian also contains a state-independent Casimir term, derived below. Distinguishing that term from energy differences will prevent a spurious shift in the plane operator dimensions.

Equal-time circles on a cylinder become concentric circles on the plane, and an annulus implements radial evolution.

Under z=ewz=e^w, the times τE=−log⁡2,0,log⁡2\tau_E=-\log2,0,\log2 give radii 1/2,1,21/2,1,2. Increasing σ\sigma is counterclockwise, and increasing τE\tau_E is outward. An annulus of radius ratio R/rR/r evolves states through time log⁡(R/r)\log(R/r); the radial evolution described in the text has its common vacuum factor removed. The cylinder drawing is schematic.

For a reflection-positive CFT with a unique, normalizable lowest-energy state separated by a gap, Euclidean propagation projects onto that state:

e−s(H−E0)∣ψ⟩⟶∣0⟩⟨0∣ψ⟩(s→∞).e^{-s(H-E_0)}|\psi\rangle \longrightarrow |0\rangle\langle0|\psi\rangle \qquad(s\to\infty).

A nonzero vacuum overlap is required to obtain a nonzero limit, and the convergence is exponential. With degenerate vacua, the limit is instead the projection onto the full ground-state space. It is not a general argument for positivity in the covariant string matter-plus-ghost theory. Timelike oscillators and ghosts have indefinite pairings, while a noncompact free boson has a continuous momentum spectrum and a delta-normalized zero-momentum vacuum. In those cases the local CFT construction remains useful, but this simple Hilbert-space projection needs additional care.

Global conformal transformations on the sphere

Section titled “Global conformal transformations on the sphere”

The local conformal algebra contains vector fields zn+1∂zz^{n+1}\partial_z. Which of them are nonsingular everywhere on the Riemann sphere?

At z=0z=0, regularity requires n≥−1n\geq-1. Near infinity use u=1/zu=1/z:

zn+1∂z=−u1−n∂u.z^{n+1}\partial_z=-u^{1-n}\partial_u.

Regularity at u=0u=0 requires n≤1n\leq1. Thus only n=−1,0,1n=-1,0,1 survive. More generally, an everywhere regular holomorphic vector field has coefficient a+bz+cz2a+bz+cz^2; regularity at infinity excludes higher powers. Its finite transformations are the Möbius maps

z⟼az+bcz+d,ad−bc≠0.z\longmapsto\frac{az+b}{cz+d}, \qquad ad-bc\ne0.

Multiplying all four coefficients by the same nonzero number does not change the map. After imposing determinant one, the matrices MM and −M-M still give the same transformation. The faithful group acting on the sphere is therefore

PSL⁡(2,C)=SL⁡(2,C)/{I,−I}.\operatorname{PSL}(2,\mathbb C) =\operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb C)/\{I,-I\}.

It has three complex, or six real, parameters. On the real Euclidean surface, the antiholomorphic map is the complex conjugate of the holomorphic map; it does not supply another six independent real parameters. Independent barred and unbarred generators are useful in the complexified algebra.

The corresponding quantum generators obey

[L0,L±1]=∓L±1,[L1,L−1]=2L0.[L_0,L_{\pm1}]=\mp L_{\pm1}, \qquad [L_1,L_{-1}]=2L_0.

The central term vanishes because m3−m=0m^3-m=0 at m=−1,0,1m=-1,0,1. These are the global transformations that remain regular on the sphere. The other Virasoro generators are still meaningful local contour operators; they are not globally regular coordinate changes of an unpunctured sphere.

Why the stress tensor acquires a Schwarzian term

Section titled “Why the stress tensor acquires a Schwarzian term”

The stress tensor is not an ordinary primary when c≠0c\ne0. From the fourth-order pole in its OPE, the positive contour action defined on page 11 gives

δϵactT=ϵ∂T+2ϵ′T+c12ϵ′′′.\delta_{\epsilon}^{\mathrm{act}}T =\epsilon\partial T+2\epsilon'T+\frac{c}{12}\epsilon'''.

For a passive coordinate change u=f(z)u=f(z), the finite version is

Tz(z)=f′(z)2Tu(f(z))+c12{f,z},T_z(z)=f'(z)^2T_u(f(z))+\frac{c}{12}\{f,z\},

where

{f,z}=f′′′(z)f′(z)−32(f′′(z)f′(z))2.\{f,z\}=\frac{f'''(z)}{f'(z)} -\frac32\left(\frac{f''(z)}{f'(z)}\right)^2.

This formula is local on a patch where ff is holomorphic and f′≠0f'\ne0. Solving for TuT_u gives the passive transformation law. For f(z)=z+ϵ(z)f(z)=z+\epsilon(z), expressing the transformed field at the same coordinate gives δpassT=−δactT\delta^{\mathrm{pass}}T=-\delta^{\mathrm{act}}T, including the anomalous term.

For DD free bosons, define the stress tensor by subtracting the short-distance contraction before bringing the two fields together:

Tz(z)=−1α′lim⁡δ→0[∂X(z+δ)⋅∂X(z)+α′D2δ2].T_z(z)=-\frac1{\alpha'}\lim_{\delta\to0} \left[ \partial X(z+\delta)\cdot\partial X(z) +\frac{\alpha'D}{2\delta^2} \right].

The separated derivatives transform by the chain rule. But the subtraction defined in the uu coordinate is proportional to (f(z+δ)−f(z))−2(f(z+\delta)-f(z))^{-2}, not δ−2\delta^{-2}. Consequently,

Tz−f′2Tu∘f=D2lim⁡δ→0[f′(z+δ)f′(z)[f(z+δ)−f(z)]2−1δ2].T_z-f'^2T_u\circ f =\frac D2\lim_{\delta\to0} \left[ \frac{f'(z+\delta)f'(z)}{[f(z+\delta)-f(z)]^2} -\frac1{\delta^2} \right].

To evaluate the limit, write a=f′(z)a=f'(z), b=f′′(z)b=f''(z) and d=f′′′(z)d=f'''(z). Taylor expansion gives

f(z+δ)−f(z)=aδ+b2δ2+d6δ3+O(δ4),f′(z+δ)f′(z)=a2+abδ+ad2δ2+O(δ3).\begin{aligned} f(z+\delta)-f(z)&=a\delta+\frac b2\delta^2+\frac d6\delta^3+O(\delta^4),\\ f'(z+\delta)f'(z)&=a^2+ab\delta+\frac{ad}{2}\delta^2+O(\delta^3). \end{aligned}

Dividing these series cancels the possible simple pole and leaves

f′(z+δ)f′(z)[f(z+δ)−f(z)]2=1δ2+16f′′′f′−14(f′′f′)2+O(δ)=1δ2+16{f,z}+O(δ).\frac{f'(z+\delta)f'(z)}{[f(z+\delta)-f(z)]^2} =\frac1{\delta^2} +\frac16\frac{f'''}{f'} -\frac14\left(\frac{f''}{f'}\right)^2+O(\delta) =\frac1{\delta^2}+\frac16\{f,z\}+O(\delta).

Since c=Dc=D, the finite remainder is precisely c{f,z}/12c\{f,z\}/12. The anomaly arises from how the short-distance subtraction changes under the map.

For a general CFT, the same finite law integrates the infinitesimal stress-tensor transformation. Its consistency under successive maps follows from

{f∘g,z}=g′(z)2{f,g(z)}+{g,z}.\{f\circ g,z\}=g'(z)^2\{f,g(z)\}+\{g,z\}.

Thus the two anomalous contributions combine correctly. Together with the infinitesimal law and the identity transformation, this fixes the local transformation along a smooth family of nonsingular maps. This argument concerns the local stress tensor; it does not settle possible global phases of a partition function.

For a Möbius map, the Schwarzian vanishes. The stress tensor therefore transforms as a weight-two field under the global conformal group, even though it is not a Virasoro primary. Such a field is called quasiprimary.

A conformal map changes the finite remainder of the point-splitting subtraction, producing the Schwarzian term.

The two short-distance kernels agree in their double pole but differ by {f,z}/6\{f,z\}/6 in their finite part. Multiplication by c/2c/2 produces the stress-tensor shift. For z=f(w)=ewz=f(w)=e^w, the Schwarzian is −1/2-1/2, giving Tcyl=z2Tplane−c/24T_{\mathrm{cyl}}=z^2T_{\mathrm{plane}}-c/24. The separated points and their distances are schematic; the limit assumes f′≠0f'\ne0.

Cylinder energy, angular momentum and the vacuum shift

Section titled “Cylinder energy, angular momentum and the vacuum shift”

For z=ewz=e^w, all three derivatives of ff equal ewe^w, so {ew,w}=−1/2\{e^w,w\}=-1/2. The stress tensor on the cylinder is therefore

Tcyl(w)=z2Tplane(z)−c24=∑n∈ZLne−nw−c24.T_{\mathrm{cyl}}(w)=z^2T_{\mathrm{plane}}(z)-\frac c{24} =\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}L_ne^{-nw}-\frac c{24}.

For the nonchiral theories considered here, the two central charges agree. The generators on the cylinder of circumference 2π2\pi are

Hcyl=L0+Lˉ0−c12,Pcyl=L0−Lˉ0.H_{\mathrm{cyl}}=L_0+\bar L_0-\frac c{12}, \qquad P_{\mathrm{cyl}}=L_0-\bar L_0.

Here PcylP_{\mathrm{cyl}} generates spatial translations around the cylinder; on the plane it measures angular momentum, or conformal spin. A state of weights (h,hˉ)(h,\bar h) has energy h+hˉ−c/12h+\bar h-c/12 and spin h−hˉh-\bar h. These formulas assume equal left and right central charges; a gravitationally anomalous chiral theory requires separate treatment of its vacuum momentum.

The identity has plane weights (0,0)(0,0). Hence

E0=−c12,Eh,hˉ−E0=h+hˉ.E_0=-\frac c{12}, \qquad E_{h,\bar h}-E_0=h+\bar h.

There is no additional constant in the plane L0L_0. The cylinder Casimir term comes from the map and must not be inserted a second time into that operator. It is also distinct from the intercept in the physical string constraints. For example, 2424 transverse bosons have c=24c=24 in each sector, whereas the covariant matter stress tensor in DD target dimensions has c=Dc=D; these are different CFT sectors.

If the cylinder has a dimensionful circumference ℓ\ell, use z=exp⁡(2πW/ℓ)z=\exp(2\pi W/\ell), where W=tE+ixW=t_E+ix and x∼x+ℓx\sim x+\ell. Then

Hℓ=2πℓ(L0+Lˉ0−c12),Pℓ=2πℓ(L0−Lˉ0),E0(ℓ)=−πc6ℓ.H_\ell=\frac{2\pi}{\ell}\left(L_0+\bar L_0-\frac c{12}\right), \qquad P_\ell=\frac{2\pi}{\ell}(L_0-\bar L_0), \qquad E_0(\ell)=-\frac{\pi c}{6\ell}.

These are worldsheet cylinder energies, with units of inverse worldsheet length. They are not target-space string masses.

The path integral over the unit disk with an insertion O\mathcal O at its center defines a wavefunctional:

ΨO[φ]=∫Φ∣∣z∣=1=φDΦ e−SE[Φ] O(0).\Psi_{\mathcal O}[\varphi] =\int_{\Phi|_{|z|=1}=\varphi}\mathcal D\Phi\, e^{-S_E[\Phi]}\,\mathcal O(0).

Its operator notation is

∣O⟩=O(0)∣0⟩.|\mathcal O\rangle=\mathcal O(0)|0\rangle.

The notation includes renormalization of the local insertion; composite fields must already be defined by their appropriate subtraction prescription. Inserting the identity gives the disk with no disturbance and prepares the conformal vacuum ∣0⟩=∣1⟩|0\rangle=|\mathbf1\rangle.

Conversely, a scaling eigenstate on the circle can be propagated toward a shrinking circle. After compensating its known radial scaling, the boundary condition defines a local insertion at the limiting point. This is the state–operator correspondence in the chosen CFT sector. Finite linear combinations of such states give corresponding linear combinations of fields. A general Hilbert-space superposition may require a convergent infinite expansion or a distributional completion; it need not be represented by one finite polynomial in the elementary fields.

The sector matters. Twisted boundary conditions require twist fields, and fermionic spin structures must be specified when fermions are present. In a noncompact free-boson theory, fixed-momentum states and their vertex operators are generalized, delta-normalized objects. One can form normalizable wave packets by smearing momentum. These qualifications do not change the local oscillator formulas derived below.

This is a correspondence in the worldsheet CFT, before imposing the physical string conditions. The identity vacuum is not an on-shell string state. Physical string vertices additionally require the appropriate matter weights, gauge equivalences and ghost or BRST conditions.

For a primary field ϕ\phi of weights (h,hˉ)(h,\bar h), the contour can be shrunk onto its insertion:

Ln∣ϕ⟩=12πi∮dz zn+1[hϕ(0)z2+∂ϕ(0)z+⋯ ]∣0⟩.L_n|\phi\rangle =\frac1{2\pi i}\oint dz\,z^{n+1} \left[\frac{h\phi(0)}{z^2}+\frac{\partial\phi(0)}z+\cdots\right]|0\rangle.

Therefore

L0∣ϕ⟩=h∣ϕ⟩,Ln∣ϕ⟩=0(n>0),L−1∣ϕ⟩=∣∂ϕ⟩.L_0|\phi\rangle=h|\phi\rangle, \qquad L_n|\phi\rangle=0\quad(n>0), \qquad L_{-1}|\phi\rangle=|\partial\phi\rangle.

The barred relations follow with the contour orientation fixed on page 12: when the contour is counterclockwise in the physical plane, Lˉn\bar L_n includes the minus sign compensating the clockwise barred coordinate. The two sectors give the two weights independently.

For the identity, T(z)∣0⟩T(z)|0\rangle is regular at the origin. Expanding it as ∑nz−n−2Ln∣0⟩\sum_nz^{-n-2}L_n|0\rangle shows that

Ln∣0⟩=0(n≥−1),Lˉn∣0⟩=0(n≥−1).L_n|0\rangle=0\quad(n\geq-1), \qquad \bar L_n|0\rangle=0\quad(n\geq-1).

The constant term is L−2∣0⟩L_{-2}|0\rangle, so

∣T⟩=T(0)∣0⟩=L−2∣0⟩.|T\rangle=T(0)|0\rangle=L_{-2}|0\rangle.

This state has weight two but is not primary when c≠0c\ne0, since L2∣T⟩=(c/2)∣0⟩L_2|T\rangle=(c/2)|0\rangle. Weight, primarity and being a nonzero state are distinct questions.

Multiple insertions inside a circle prepare another state on its boundary. Expanding that state in a basis of scaling eigenstates produces the OPE inside correlators whose other insertions lie outside the circle. This is why the position of the nearest outside insertion controls the local expansion’s domain, rather than the distance from an unrelated coordinate origin.

To form an inner product, glue the disk preparing a ket to a reflected disk preparing its bra, integrating over the common boundary data. Euclidean time reflection τE↦−τE\tau_E\mapsto-\tau_E acts on the plane as

z⟼1zˉ.z\longmapsto\frac1{\bar z}.

It fixes the unit circle and exchanges its inside and outside. Reflection includes complex conjugation. For a scalar primary ϕ\phi of dimension Δ\Delta, with conjugate field ϕ∗\phi^*, the resulting bra is

⟨ϕ∣=lim⁡R→∞R2Δ⟨0∣ϕ∗(R),\langle\phi| =\lim_{R\to\infty}R^{2\Delta}\langle0|\phi^*(R),

where the limit is along the positive real axis. If

⟨ϕ∗(z,zˉ)ϕ(0)⟩=Cϕz2hzˉ2hˉ,\langle\phi^*(z,\bar z)\phi(0)\rangle =\frac{C_\phi}{z^{2h}\bar z^{2\bar h}},

then ⟨ϕ∣ϕ⟩=Cϕ\langle\phi|\phi\rangle=C_\phi. Positivity of this number follows in a reflection-positive sector; it does not follow from conformal covariance alone.

Reflecting the disk across the unit circle converts an insertion at the origin into a conjugate insertion at infinity and gluing gives the state norm.

For a scalar primary with h=hˉ=Δ/2h=\bar h=\Delta/2, the inside disk prepares ∣ϕ⟩|\phi\rangle and the reflected outside disk prepares its adjoint. The insertion at infinity includes the factor R2ΔR^{2\Delta}. Gluing produces the two-point pairing; it is positive in a reflection-positive sector. The geometry is schematic and the formula is a primary-field formula, not the transformation law of an arbitrary descendant.

For a spinning primary, the analogous factors are zˉ−2hz−2hˉ\bar z^{-2h}z^{-2\bar h} in the radial adjoint, with the conjugate field and its tensor phases fixed by continuation from the Lorentzian theory. In particular, the Hermitian stress tensor obeys

[T(z)]†=zˉ−4T(1/zˉ).[T(z)]^\dagger=\bar z^{-4}T(1/\bar z).

There is no Schwarzian contribution because inversion is Möbius. Comparing Laurent series on the two sides gives

∑nLn†zˉ−n−2=∑nLnzˉn−2,Ln†=L−n.\sum_nL_n^\dagger\bar z^{-n-2} =\sum_nL_n\bar z^{n-2}, \qquad L_n^\dagger=L_{-n}.

The same reasoning gives Lˉn†=Lˉ−n\bar L_n^\dagger=\bar L_{-n}. With a unit-normalized vacuum, it follows that

⟨T∣T⟩=⟨0∣L2L−2∣0⟩=⟨0∣[L2,L−2]∣0⟩=c2.\langle T|T\rangle =\langle0|L_2L_{-2}|0\rangle =\langle0|[L_2,L_{-2}]|0\rangle =\frac c2.

The two-point coefficient in the TTTT OPE is exactly the stress-tensor state’s norm. Thus a positive inner product requires c≥0c\geq0; strict positivity of this state requires c>0c>0.

Two qualifications are useful. First, a derivative of a primary acquires extra terms under inversion. Multiplying its conjugate by R2(Δ+1)R^{2(\Delta+1)} alone does not construct the correct bra; exercise 4 derives the missing term. Second, conformal sewing can also define a bilinear BPZ pairing using holomorphic inversion. That operation is linear, whereas a Hermitian adjoint is conjugate-linear. Neither the sewing construction nor the relation Ln†=L−nL_n^\dagger=L_{-n} establishes positivity for timelike matter or ghosts.

The exact free-boson oscillator–operator map

Section titled “The exact free-boson oscillator–operator map”

For a free boson, the identity state has zero momentum. Regularity of ∂X(z)∣0⟩\partial X(z)|0\rangle implies αnμ∣0⟩=0\alpha_n^\mu|0\rangle=0 for n≥0n\geq0, and similarly for the barred oscillators. Define

Vk(z,zˉ)=:eik⋅X(z,zˉ):,∣0;k⟩=Vk(0)∣0⟩.V_k(z,\bar z)=:e^{ik\cdot X(z,\bar z)}:, \qquad |0;k\rangle=V_k(0)|0\rangle.

The OPE derived on page 10 is

∂Xμ(z)Vk(0)∼−iα′kμ2zVk(0).\partial X^\mu(z)V_k(0) \sim-\frac{i\alpha'k^\mu}{2z}V_k(0).

Taking the current contour gives α0μ∣0;k⟩=α′/2 kμ∣0;k⟩\alpha_0^\mu|0;k\rangle=\sqrt{\alpha'/2}\,k^\mu|0;k\rangle. Positive modes annihilate the state. Its weights are h=hˉ=α′k2/4h=\bar h=\alpha'k^2/4; for noncompact real momenta the state normalization contains a momentum delta function.

Subtract the momentum pole before taking the limit

Section titled “Subtract the momentum pole before taking the limit”

Acting on the momentum state, the full mode expansion reads

∂Xμ(z)∣0;k⟩=−iα′kμ2z∣0;k⟩−iα′2∑r≥1zr−1α−rμ∣0;k⟩.\partial X^\mu(z)|0;k\rangle =-\frac{i\alpha'k^\mu}{2z}|0;k\rangle -i\sqrt{\frac{\alpha'}2}\sum_{r\geq1}z^{r-1}\alpha_{-r}^\mu|0;k\rangle.

The limit z→0z\to0 does not exist until the first term is subtracted. The required local field is jointly normal ordered:

:∂XμVk:(0)=lim⁡z→0[∂Xμ(z)Vk(0)+iα′kμ2zVk(0)].:\partial X^\mu V_k:(0) =\lim_{z\to0}\left[ \partial X^\mu(z)V_k(0) +\frac{i\alpha'k^\mu}{2z}V_k(0) \right].

Thus it creates −iα′/2 α−1μ∣0;k⟩-i\sqrt{\alpha'/2}\,\alpha_{-1}^\mu|0;k\rangle. For higher derivatives, differentiate the expansion m−1m-1 times and subtract the differentiated momentum pole. The only constant creation term comes from r=mr=m, with coefficient (m−1)!(m-1)!. Therefore the exact dictionary is

α−mμ∣0;k⟩⟷i(m−1)!2α′:∂mXμeik⋅X:,m≥1.\alpha_{-m}^\mu|0;k\rangle \quad\longleftrightarrow\quad \frac{i}{(m-1)!}\sqrt{\frac2{\alpha'}} :\partial^mX^\mu e^{ik\cdot X}:, \qquad m\geq1.

The phase and factorial follow from the shared mode expansion. There is no unspecified proportionality factor. In particular, ∂mXμ:eik⋅X:\partial^mX^\mu:e^{ik\cdot X}: with separate normal ordering would leave the derivative–exponential contraction unsubtracted.

For several creation modes, take a single normal-ordered product of all derivative fields and the exponential, subtracting every pairwise contraction. The holomorphic map is

α−m1μ1⋯α−msμs∣0;k⟩⟷[∏a=1si2/α′(ma−1)!]×:∂m1Xμ1⋯∂msXμseik⋅X:.\begin{aligned} \alpha_{-m_1}^{\mu_1}\cdots\alpha_{-m_s}^{\mu_s}|0;k\rangle \quad\longleftrightarrow\quad &\left[\prod_{a=1}^s\frac{i\sqrt{2/\alpha'}}{(m_a-1)!}\right]\\ &\times:\partial^{m_1}X^{\mu_1}\cdots\partial^{m_s}X^{\mu_s}e^{ik\cdot X}:. \end{aligned}

Every antiholomorphic oscillator adds the same coefficient and a barred derivative inside those colons. Examples are

α−2μ∣0;k⟩⟷i2/α′:∂2Xμeik⋅X:,α−1μα−1ν∣0;k⟩⟷−2α′:∂Xμ∂Xνeik⋅X:,α−1μα~−1ν∣0;k⟩⟷−2α′:∂Xμ∂ˉXνeik⋅X:.\begin{aligned} \alpha_{-2}^\mu|0;k\rangle &\longleftrightarrow i\sqrt{2/\alpha'}:\partial^2X^\mu e^{ik\cdot X}:,\\ \alpha_{-1}^\mu\alpha_{-1}^\nu|0;k\rangle &\longleftrightarrow-\frac2{\alpha'}:\partial X^\mu\partial X^\nu e^{ik\cdot X}:,\\ \alpha_{-1}^\mu\widetilde\alpha_{-1}^\nu|0;k\rangle &\longleftrightarrow-\frac2{\alpha'}:\partial X^\mu\bar\partial X^\nu e^{ik\cdot X}:. \end{aligned}

These normal products are local fields defined by the plane subtraction prescription. Mixed contact distributions at coincident points do not supply an additional oscillator family or an extra factor in this separated-point state map.

If the mode levels are N=∑amaN=\sum_am_a and N~=∑bnb\widetilde N=\sum_bn_b, the corresponding weights are

h=α′k24+N,hˉ=α′k24+N~.h=\frac{\alpha'k^2}{4}+N, \qquad \bar h=\frac{\alpha'k^2}{4}+\widetilde N.

Being a weight eigenoperator does not imply primarity. For example,

L1ϵμα−1μ∣0;k⟩=α′2(ϵ⋅k)∣0;k⟩.L_1\epsilon_\mu\alpha_{-1}^\mu|0;k\rangle =\sqrt{\frac{\alpha'}2}(\epsilon\cdot k)|0;k\rangle.

The corresponding chiral factor is primary only if ϵ⋅k=0\epsilon\cdot k=0. It is one building block of a closed-string vertex, not by itself a complete closed-string gauge boson. The open-string boundary construction has its own doubling factors, as explained on page 12.

Finally,

L−1∣0;k⟩=α′2 k⋅α−1∣0;k⟩⟷∂Vk=ik⋅:∂XVk:.L_{-1}|0;k\rangle =\sqrt{\frac{\alpha'}2}\,k\cdot\alpha_{-1}|0;k\rangle \quad\longleftrightarrow\quad \partial V_k=i k\cdot:\partial X V_k:.

At k=0k=0, this derivative vanishes because V0=1V_0=\mathbf1. Nevertheless, α−1μ∣0;0⟩\alpha_{-1}^\mu|0;0\rangle is generally nonzero and corresponds to a current. The current is a new primary, not a derivative of the identity. This simple example already shows why one oscillator Fock sector need not be a single Virasoro family.

Exercise 1. Regular vector fields and the Möbius quotient

Section titled “Exercise 1. Regular vector fields and the Möbius quotient”

Show that a holomorphic vector field regular on the whole sphere has the form (a+bz+cz2)∂z(a+bz+cz^2)\partial_z. Explain why the global group is PSL⁡(2,C)\operatorname{PSL}(2,\mathbb C) rather than a faithful action of SL⁡(2,C)\operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb C). Check explicitly that inversion z↦1/zz\mapsto1/z belongs to this group even though it sends a finite point to infinity.

Solution

Write the entire coefficient as v(z)=∑j≥0ajzjv(z)=\sum_{j\geq0}a_jz^j. In the coordinate u=1/zu=1/z, the vector field is

v(z)∂z=−u2v(1/u)∂u=−∑j≥0aju2−j∂u.v(z)\partial_z=-u^2v(1/u)\partial_u =-\sum_{j\geq0}a_ju^{2-j}\partial_u.

Regularity at u=0u=0 forces aj=0a_j=0 for j>2j>2. The three coefficients are the infinitesimal translation, dilation/rotation and special conformal parameters.

A nonsingular matrix MM defines (az+b)/(cz+d)(az+b)/(cz+d), and every nonzero scalar multiple of MM defines the same map. Normalizing its determinant to one leaves the ambiguity M∼−MM\sim-M. The determinant-one matrices have three complex parameters, so the quotient has six real parameters; dividing by this discrete ambiguity does not change the dimension.

For inversion, choose

M=(0ii0),det⁡M=1,0z+iiz+0=1z.M=\begin{pmatrix}0&i\\ i&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad\det M=1, \qquad \frac{0z+i}{iz+0}=\frac1z.

The apparent pole at z=0z=0 is a regular image point in the second sphere chart. A coordinate denominator vanishing is not itself a singularity of the sphere map. By contrast, a branched map such as z2z^2 is not a Möbius automorphism.

Exercise 2. Composition and a map with a branch point

Section titled “Exercise 2. Composition and a map with a branch point”

Derive the Schwarzian chain rule. Then compute the Schwarzian of f(z)=zpf(z)=z^p for an integer p>1p>1 on a patch excluding zero. If the stress tensor in the ff coordinate has zero expectation value, explain why the resulting negative coefficient of z−2z^{-2} is not a negative-norm or negative-energy state in a unitary plane CFT.

Solution

Let Af=f′′/f′A_f=f''/f'. The Schwarzian can be written as {f,z}=Af′−Af2/2\{f,z\}=A_f'-A_f^2/2. For a composite map,

Af∘g=(Af∘g)g′+Ag.A_{f\circ g}=(A_f\circ g)g'+A_g.

Differentiating and subtracting half the square gives

{f∘g,z}=(g′)2(Af′∘g−12(Af∘g)2)+Ag′−12Ag2+(Af∘g)(g′′−g′Ag).\begin{aligned} \{f\circ g,z\} ={}&(g')^2\left(A_f'\circ g-\frac12(A_f\circ g)^2\right) +A_g'-\frac12A_g^2\\ &+(A_f\circ g)(g''-g'A_g). \end{aligned}

The last term vanishes by definition of AgA_g, leaving the chain rule in the main text.

For f=zpf=z^p, Af=(p−1)/zA_f=(p-1)/z, so

{zp,z}=−p−1z2−(p−1)22z2=1−p22z2.\{z^p,z\}=-\frac{p-1}{z^2}-\frac{(p-1)^2}{2z^2} =\frac{1-p^2}{2z^2}.

Thus a locally pulled-back vacuum has

⟨Tz(z)⟩=c(1−p2)24z2.\langle T_z(z)\rangle=\frac{c(1-p^2)}{24z^2}.

The derivation is valid on a patch where the map is one-to-one and f′≠0f'\ne0. At the origin, f′=0f'=0, and a full punctured neighborhood is covered pp times. This is not a globally regular change of coordinates preparing the ordinary plane vacuum or an ordinary positive-energy state in its sector. Extending the construction across the branch point requires specifying different geometry or sector data. The local stress transformation alone supplies no counterexample to unitarity.

Exercise 3. A cylinder correlator measures an energy gap

Section titled “Exercise 3. A cylinder correlator measures an energy gap”

Take a scalar primary of dimension Δ\Delta, with plane two-point function Cϕ∣z1−z2∣−2ΔC_\phi|z_1-z_2|^{-2\Delta}. Map it to a cylinder of circumference ℓ\ell. Find its vacuum two-point function at equal spatial position and Euclidean time separation t>0t>0, and extract the short-time behavior and the large-time energy gap.

Solution

Set a=2π/ℓa=2\pi/\ell and z=eaWz=e^{aW}. Since h=hˉ=Δ/2h=\bar h=\Delta/2, each insertion contributes the primary Jacobian ∣az∣Δ|az|^\Delta. At W1=tW_1=t and W2=0W_2=0,

Gℓ(t)=Cϕa2ΔeaΔt(eat−1)2Δ=Cϕ[π/ℓsinh⁡(πt/ℓ)]2Δ.G_\ell(t)=C_\phi\frac{a^{2\Delta}e^{a\Delta t}}{(e^{at}-1)^{2\Delta}} =C_\phi\left[\frac{\pi/\ell}{\sinh(\pi t/\ell)}\right]^{2\Delta}.

For t≪ℓt\ll\ell, sinh⁡(πt/ℓ)∼πt/ℓ\sinh(\pi t/\ell)\sim\pi t/\ell, recovering Cϕt−2ΔC_\phi t^{-2\Delta}. For t≫ℓt\gg\ell,

Gℓ(t)∼Cϕ(2πℓ)2Δe−(2πΔ/ℓ)t.G_\ell(t)\sim C_\phi\left(\frac{2\pi}{\ell}\right)^{2\Delta} e^{-(2\pi\Delta/\ell)t}.

The spectral expansion of a vacuum correlator involves e−(En−E0)te^{-(E_n-E_0)t}, so the lightest state coupled to this primary has gap 2πΔ/ℓ2\pi\Delta/\ell. Its absolute energy is

Eϕ=2πℓ(Δ−c12).E_\phi=\frac{2\pi}{\ell}\left(\Delta-\frac c{12}\right).

The vacuum Casimir energy cancels in the gap. This is a zero-temperature correlator on a spatial circle; a thermal interpretation would require a different choice of which cylinder direction is Euclidean time.

Exercise 4. The bra of a derivative is not a primary bra

Section titled “Exercise 4. The bra of a derivative is not a primary bra”

For a holomorphic primary of real weight hh, take ⟨ϕ∗(z)ϕ(0)⟩=Cz−2h\langle\phi^*(z)\phi(0)\rangle=Cz^{-2h} with consistent local branches. Use radial conjugation to construct the bra of ∣∂ϕ⟩|\partial\phi\rangle. Evaluate its norm directly from the two-point function and compare with ⟨ϕ∣L1L−1∣ϕ⟩\langle\phi|L_1L_{-1}|\phi\rangle.

Solution

For this chiral field, the radial adjoint is [ϕ(z)]†=zˉ−2hϕ∗(1/zˉ)[\phi(z)]^\dagger=\bar z^{-2h}\phi^*(1/\bar z). Differentiating with respect to zˉ\bar z yields

[∂ϕ(z)]†=−2hzˉ−2h−1ϕ∗(1/zˉ)−zˉ−2h−2∂ϕ∗(1/zˉ).[\partial\phi(z)]^\dagger =-2h\bar z^{-2h-1}\phi^*(1/\bar z) -\bar z^{-2h-2}\partial\phi^*(1/\bar z).

Sending zz to zero along the positive real axis, with R=1/zR=1/z, therefore gives

⟨∂ϕ∣=lim⁡R→∞⟨0∣[−R2h+2∂ϕ∗(R)−2hR2h+1ϕ∗(R)].\langle\partial\phi| =\lim_{R\to\infty}\langle0| \left[-R^{2h+2}\partial\phi^*(R)-2hR^{2h+1}\phi^*(R)\right].

The two needed correlators follow by differentiating C(R−y)−2hC(R-y)^{-2h} with respect to yy and then RR:

⟨ϕ∗(R)∂ϕ(0)⟩=2hCR−2h−1,⟨∂ϕ∗(R)∂ϕ(0)⟩=−2h(2h+1)CR−2h−2.\begin{aligned} \langle\phi^*(R)\partial\phi(0)\rangle&=2hC R^{-2h-1},\\ \langle\partial\phi^*(R)\partial\phi(0)\rangle&=-2h(2h+1)C R^{-2h-2}. \end{aligned}

Substitution gives ⟨∂ϕ∣∂ϕ⟩=2h(2h+1)C−4h2C=2hC\langle\partial\phi|\partial\phi\rangle=2h(2h+1)C-4h^2C=2hC. The algebra gives the same result:

⟨ϕ∣L1L−1∣ϕ⟩=⟨ϕ∣[L1,L−1]∣ϕ⟩=2h⟨ϕ∣ϕ⟩=2hC.\langle\phi|L_1L_{-1}|\phi\rangle =\langle\phi|[L_1,L_{-1}]|\phi\rangle =2h\langle\phi|\phi\rangle=2hC.

The extra primary term and the sign from differentiating the inverse coordinate are both essential. Treating ∂ϕ\partial\phi as a primary of weight h+1h+1 would give an incorrect pairing. In a positive sector with C>0C>0, this norm also requires h≥0h\geq0; the classification of null descendants is a separate question.

Exercise 5. Momentum subtraction and two creation modes

Section titled “Exercise 5. Momentum subtraction and two creation modes”

For one spacelike free boson, derive the local fields corresponding to α−1∣0;k⟩\alpha_{-1}|0;k\rangle, α−2∣0;k⟩\alpha_{-2}|0;k\rangle and α−12∣0;k⟩\alpha_{-1}^2|0;k\rangle at nonzero momentum. State explicitly which contractions must be subtracted in the last case. Check their oscillator norms after factoring out the momentum delta function.

Solution

The first two subtractions are

:∂XVk:(0)=lim⁡z→0[∂X(z)Vk(0)+iα′k2zVk(0)],:∂2XVk:(0)=lim⁡z→0[∂2X(z)Vk(0)−iα′k2z2Vk(0)].\begin{aligned} :\partial X V_k:(0) &=\lim_{z\to0}\left[\partial X(z)V_k(0)+\frac{i\alpha'k}{2z}V_k(0)\right],\\ :\partial^2X V_k:(0) &=\lim_{z\to0}\left[\partial^2X(z)V_k(0)-\frac{i\alpha'k}{2z^2}V_k(0)\right]. \end{aligned}

Both create −iα′/2-i\sqrt{\alpha'/2} times the corresponding α−m\alpha_{-m} state for m=1,2m=1,2. At general mm, the singular term being subtracted is

−iα′k2(−1)m−1(m−1)! z−mVk(0).-\frac{i\alpha'k}{2}(-1)^{m-1}(m-1)!\,z^{-m}V_k(0).

For the two-oscillator field, put A=∂X(z)A=\partial X(z), B=∂X(u)B=\partial X(u) and define their contractions with each other and with the exponential by

CAB=−α′2(z−u)2,cA=−iα′k2z,cB=−iα′k2u.C_{AB}=-\frac{\alpha'}{2(z-u)^2}, \qquad c_A=-\frac{i\alpha'k}{2z}, \qquad c_B=-\frac{i\alpha'k}{2u}.

Wick’s theorem gives the jointly ordered product as the limit of

ABVk−CABVk−cABVk−cBAVk+cAcBVk.ABV_k-C_{AB}V_k-c_A BV_k-c_B AV_k+c_Ac_BV_k.

The final term corrects the double subtraction of the two derivative–exponential contractions. Removing only CABC_{AB} would leave momentum poles; removing only cAc_A and cBc_B would leave the derivative–derivative pole. After all subtractions, only the product of the regular creation parts survives. Therefore

α−1∣0;k⟩⟷i2/α′:∂XVk:,α−2∣0;k⟩⟷i2/α′:∂2XVk:,α−12∣0;k⟩⟷−2α′:(∂X)2Vk:.\begin{aligned} \alpha_{-1}|0;k\rangle&\longleftrightarrow i\sqrt{2/\alpha'}:\partial X V_k:,\\ \alpha_{-2}|0;k\rangle&\longleftrightarrow i\sqrt{2/\alpha'}:\partial^2X V_k:,\\ \alpha_{-1}^2|0;k\rangle&\longleftrightarrow-\frac2{\alpha'}:(\partial X)^2V_k:. \end{aligned}

Using [αm,αn]=mδm+n,0[\alpha_m,\alpha_n]=m\delta_{m+n,0} and unit oscillator-vacuum pairing at fixed momentum, the norms are 11, 22 and 22, respectively. The two level-two states are orthogonal because ⟨k∣α2α−12∣k⟩=0\langle k|\alpha_2\alpha_{-1}^2|k\rangle=0. These positive results use a spacelike boson; a timelike oscillator changes the one-particle norm’s sign.

Exercise 6. The identity, the current and the stress tensor

Section titled “Exercise 6. The identity, the current and the stress tensor”

For one spacelike boson at zero momentum, distinguish the three states L−1∣0⟩L_{-1}|0\rangle, α−1∣0⟩\alpha_{-1}|0\rangle and L−2∣0⟩L_{-2}|0\rangle. Identify their local operators, primarity and norms. Also identify α−2∣0⟩\alpha_{-2}|0\rangle and explain why this does not make the current a derivative of the identity.

Solution

Since ∂1=0\partial\mathbf1=0, L−1∣0⟩=0L_{-1}|0\rangle=0. The current

J(z)=i2α′ ∂X(z)J(z)=i\sqrt{\frac2{\alpha'}}\,\partial X(z)

has mode expansion J(z)=∑nαnz−n−1J(z)=\sum_n\alpha_nz^{-n-1} and creates ∣J⟩=α−1∣0⟩|J\rangle=\alpha_{-1}|0\rangle. Its OPE with TT is that of a primary of weight one. Equivalently, [Ln,α−1]=αn−1[L_n,\alpha_{-1}]=\alpha_{n-1}, which annihilates the zero-momentum vacuum for n>0n>0. Its norm is one.

The stress tensor creates

∣T⟩=L−2∣0⟩=12α−12∣0⟩.|T\rangle=L_{-2}|0\rangle=\frac12\alpha_{-1}^2|0\rangle.

The dictionary maps this state to −:(∂X)2:/α′=T-:(\partial X)^2:/\alpha'=T. Its norm is 14×2=1/2=c/2\tfrac14\times2=1/2=c/2. It is quasiprimary but not primary: L1∣T⟩=0L_1|T\rangle=0 and L2∣T⟩=12∣0⟩L_2|T\rangle=\tfrac12|0\rangle.

Finally,

L−1∣J⟩=[L−1,α−1]∣0⟩=α−2∣0⟩⟷∂J.L_{-1}|J\rangle =[L_{-1},\alpha_{-1}]|0\rangle =\alpha_{-2}|0\rangle \quad\longleftrightarrow\quad\partial J.

This state has norm 22, consistently with exercise 4 at h=1h=1. It is a derivative of the current, which is a different nonzero primary. It is not a derivative of the identity. The oscillator sector therefore contains both the identity family and states generated from the current, before one undertakes any full decomposition into Virasoro representations.

  • Ginsparg, Paul. “Applied Conformal Field Theory.” In Fields, Strings and Critical Phenomena, Les Houches, Session XLIX (1988), edited by Édouard Brézin and Jean Zinn-Justin, pp. 1–168. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989. arXiv:hep-th/9108028. Sections 3.4–3.5 develop in- and out-states, radial adjoints and the primary-state conditions.
  • Tong, David. Lectures on String Theory. University of Cambridge lecture notes, 2009, revised 2012. arXiv:0908.0333. Sections 4.4–4.4.1 discuss the stress transformation and Casimir energy; sections 4.5.1 and 4.6 develop radial quantization and the state–operator map. The cylinder coordinate used there differs from the one fixed in this course overview, so intermediate stress-tensor signs must be translated with the coordinate map.