Skip to content

Open-String T-Duality and D-Branes

T-duality turns a compact direction in which an open-string endpoint can move into a direction in which its position is fixed. The allowed endpoint positions define D-branes. A flat gauge connection becomes the positions of these branes, and a shifted momentum becomes the energy needed to stretch a string between them.

The central equality is ΔY′=2πα′pY\Delta Y'=2\pi\alpha'p_Y: the momentum before duality determines an oriented endpoint separation afterward. We will derive this relation, the resulting mass spectrum, and the gauge and displacement fields carried by the brane. The worldsheet derivation begins with the bosonic string; the corresponding GSO-projected Type II spectrum will be identified separately. The metric, string tension and Hermitian gauge fields follow the shared definitions.

Let Y∼Y+2πRY\sim Y+2\pi R be a spatial circle and 0≤σ≤π0\leq\sigma\leq\pi the open-string interval. Varying the conformal-gauge action produces, besides the wave equation, the boundary term

δS∣∂Σ=−12πα′∫dτ [∂σY δY]σ=0σ=π.\delta S\big|_{\partial\Sigma}=-\frac1{2\pi\alpha'}\int d\tau\, [\partial_\sigma Y\,\delta Y]_{\sigma=0}^{\sigma=\pi}.

There are two elementary ways to make this vanish. At a Neumann endpoint, δY\delta Y is arbitrary and ∂σY=0\partial_\sigma Y=0. At a Dirichlet endpoint, YY is prescribed and δY=0\delta Y=0. For a static Dirichlet position, ∂τY=0\partial_\tau Y=0 at the endpoint. These conditions refer to the boundary of the worldsheet; the prescribed position lies in target space.

For Neumann conditions at both ends, write

Y=y+2α′pYτ+i2α′∑m≠0αmYme−imτcos⁡mσ.Y=y+2\alpha'p_Y\tau +i\sqrt{2\alpha'}\sum_{m\ne0}\frac{\alpha_m^Y}{m}e^{-im\tau}\cos m\sigma.

With trivial holonomy, pY=n/Rp_Y=n/R, n∈Zn\in\mathbb Z. There is no conserved open-string winding in this Neumann direction: the endpoints can move and unwind the string.

The wave equation gives Y=YL(τ+σ)+YR(τ−σ)Y=Y_L(\tau+\sigma)+Y_R(\tau-\sigma). Define the dual coordinate by Y~=YL−YR\widetilde Y=Y_L-Y_R. Differentiating fixes both signs:

∂τY~=∂σY,∂σY~=∂τY.\partial_\tau\widetilde Y=\partial_\sigma Y, \qquad \partial_\sigma\widetilde Y=\partial_\tau Y.

Consequently, a Neumann endpoint of YY is a static Dirichlet endpoint of Y~\widetilde Y. Conversely, a Dirichlet endpoint becomes Neumann. The coordinate Hamiltonian density, proportional to Y˙2+(∂σY)2\dot Y^2+(\partial_\sigma Y)^2, is unchanged. This is the canonical transformation explained on the closed-string T-duality page; substituting the derivative swap into the Lorentzian Lagrangian is not an equality of Lagrangian densities.

Subtracting the two chiral pieces gives the dual expansion

Y~=y~+2α′pYσ+2α′∑m≠0αmYme−imτsin⁡mσ.\widetilde Y=\widetilde y+2\alpha'p_Y\sigma +\sqrt{2\alpha'}\sum_{m\ne0}\frac{\alpha_m^Y}{m}e^{-im\tau}\sin m\sigma.

The sine term has no extra ii: the difference of the two complex exponentials supplies it. Pairing mm with −m-m, using αm†=α−m\alpha_m^\dagger=\alpha_{-m}, makes the Hermiticity of the expansion explicit. All oscillator terms vanish at the endpoints, so

Y~(0)=y~,Y~(π)=y~+2πα′pY.\widetilde Y(0)=\widetilde y, \qquad \widetilde Y(\pi)=\widetilde y+2\pi\alpha'p_Y.

For pY=n/Rp_Y=n/R and R′=α′/RR'=\alpha'/R, the endpoints differ by 2πnR′2\pi nR'. On the dual circle they are the same point; on its universal cover they are different images of that point. The integer nn now labels the lifted endpoint sector. It does not place the two endpoints at arbitrary distinct points of the circle.

A cosine standing wave has free Neumann endpoint values, while its dual sine wave has fixed Dirichlet endpoint values at two times

A single real mode with pY=0p_Y=0: Y/A=cos⁡σcos⁡τY/A=\cos\sigma\cos\tau and Y~/A=−sin⁡σsin⁡τ\widetilde Y/A=-\sin\sigma\sin\tau, with the additive constants set to zero. Both panels have the same dimensionless scales and show τ=0\tau=0 and π/2\pi/2. Neumann endpoint slopes vanish; dual endpoint values stay fixed. This isolates the oscillator map. Nonzero momentum adds the dual linear term and separates endpoint images.

A Dp-brane has pp spatial worldvolume directions and one time direction. An open string ending on it has Neumann conditions along that worldvolume and Dirichlet conditions in its D−p−1D-p-1 transverse directions. A brane is a hypersurface only when this codimension is one.

T-dualizing a compact tangent direction changes a Dp-brane into a D(p−1)(p-1)-brane; dualizing a transverse direction changes it into a D(p+1)(p+1)-brane. The bosonic space-filling starting point is a D25-brane. For identical BPS branes in Type II theory, even pp belongs to IIA and odd pp to IIB. In particular, a supersymmetric space-filling Type II D9-brane belongs to IIB. A spatial T-duality exchanges IIA and IIB, consistently with the Ramond-sector chirality analysis.

Now take two parallel branes with transverse separation vector ΔYI\Delta Y^I. The Dirichlet zero mode is

YI=yiI+ΔYIπσ+sine oscillators.Y^I=y_i^I+\frac{\Delta Y^I}{\pi}\sigma+\text{sine oscillators}.

Its contribution to the left derivative is half the gradient. Matching the usual oscillator normalization gives

α0I=ΔYIπ2α′,12α0Iα0I=∣ΔY∣24π2α′.\alpha_0^I=\frac{\Delta Y^I}{\pi\sqrt{2\alpha'}}, \qquad \frac12\alpha_0^I\alpha_0^I=\frac{|\Delta Y|^2}{4\pi^2\alpha'}.

This term replaces the transverse momentum contribution. There is no freely variable transverse center-of-mass momentum for a string whose endpoints obey these Dirichlet conditions.

Let kak_a be the momentum along the remaining noncompact brane directions and M2=−kakaM^2=-k_ak^a. The oscillator mass-shell constraint is

−α′M2+∣ΔY∣24π2α′+Nosc−aosc=0.-\alpha'M^2+\frac{|\Delta Y|^2}{4\pi^2\alpha'}+N_{\rm osc}-a_{\rm osc}=0.

Thus the exact free-string spectrum in this flat background is

M2=∣ΔY∣2(2πα′)2+Nosc−aoscα′,aosc={1bosonic,1/2NS,0R.M^2=\frac{|\Delta Y|^2}{(2\pi\alpha')^2} +\frac{N_{\rm osc}-a_{\rm osc}}{\alpha'}, \qquad a_{\rm osc}=\begin{cases}1&\text{bosonic},\\[2pt]1/2&\text{NS},\\[2pt]0&\text{R}.\end{cases}

These are oscillator intercepts, not a redefinition of the plane Ramond vacuum weight; the open-superstring spectrum explains that distinction and the GSO projection. Open strings have one oscillator constraint rather than the two independent closed-string conditions that lead to level matching.

On the vector branch, Nosc=aoscN_{\rm osc}=a_{\rm osc}, the mass is

M=∣ΔY∣2πα′=T∣ΔY∣.M=\frac{|\Delta Y|}{2\pi\alpha'}=T|\Delta Y|.

The right side is the tension times the shortest length in the specified image sector. Minimizing over image sectors is a separate operation. Excited states also carry oscillator energy.

The bosonic ground state instead has M2=∣ΔY∣2/(2πα′)2−1/α′M^2=|\Delta Y|^2/(2\pi\alpha')^2-1/\alpha'. It remains tachyonic for ∣ΔY∣<2πα′|\Delta Y|<2\pi\sqrt{\alpha'} and is massless at the threshold. Statements below about massless vectors and gauge enhancement therefore concern the vector branch. The boundary-condition argument itself does not remove the bosonic tachyon.

Consider NN Chan–Paton labels and a flat constant connection on the original circle. A constant unitary transformation diagonalizes it:

AY=12πRdiag⁡(θ1,…,θN),W=ei∮AYdY=diag⁡(eiθ1,…,eiθN).A_Y=\frac1{2\pi R}\operatorname{diag}(\theta_1,\ldots,\theta_N), \qquad W=e^{i\oint A_YdY}=\operatorname{diag}(e^{i\theta_1},\ldots,e^{i\theta_N}).

The Wilson loop WW is physical even though the field strength vanishes. The angles are eigenphases modulo 2π2\pi, with permutations identifying the same collection of eigenvalues.

Keep the endpoint label ii at σ=0\sigma=0 and jj at σ=π\sigma=\pi. An adjoint component proportional to the matrix unit EijE_{ij} has a periodic Fourier factor einY/Re^{inY/R}. The global Hermitian covariant derivative acts as

DYΨij=∂YΨij−i(Ai−Aj)Ψij.D_Y\Psi_{ij}=\partial_Y\Psi_{ij}-i(A_i-A_j)\Psi_{ij}.

The kinetic momentum is the eigenvalue of −iDY-iD_Y:

pij,n=nR−Ai+Aj=2πn+θj−θi2πR.p_{ij,n}=\frac nR-A_i+A_j =\frac{2\pi n+\theta_j-\theta_i}{2\pi R}.

The order of the two phases follows from the specified derivative and endpoint labels. It should not be changed while retaining the same labels.

The same shift can be obtained without a covariant derivative. With Ψ′=UΨU−1\Psi'=U\Psi U^{-1}, the connection transforms as

AY′=UAYU−1−i(∂YU)U−1.A_Y'=UA_YU^{-1}-i(\partial_YU)U^{-1}.

Choose U(Y)=e−iAYYU(Y)=e^{-iA_YY}. This gives AY′=0A_Y'=0, but generally U(Y+2πR)=W−1U(Y)U(Y+2\pi R)=W^{-1}U(Y). Therefore the originally periodic matrix field now satisfies

Ψ′(Y+2πR)=W−1Ψ′(Y)W,Ψij′(Y+2πR)=ei(θj−θi)Ψij′(Y).\Psi'(Y+2\pi R)=W^{-1}\Psi'(Y)W, \qquad \Psi'_{ij}(Y+2\pi R)=e^{i(\theta_j-\theta_i)}\Psi'_{ij}(Y).

Allowed plane waves have exactly the momenta found above. A flat connection can be traded for a twist in the boundary condition; a nonperiodic transformation does not erase its holonomy. This derivation also explains the inverse holonomy in the left factor. See Polchinski, sections 2.3–2.4 for the connection between this twist and D-brane positions.

Apply the duality relation ΔY′=2πα′p\Delta Y'=2\pi\alpha'p to each sector. It is satisfied by

Yi′=2πα′Ai=R′θi,ΔYij,n′=Yj′−Yi′+2πnR′.Y_i'=2\pi\alpha'A_i=R'\theta_i, \qquad \Delta Y'_{ij,n}=Y_j'-Y_i'+2\pi nR'.

The common shift of all Yi′Y_i' is the overall brane position; phase differences determine the stretching. An endpoint on brane jj may be represented by any image Yj′+2πnR′Y_j'+2\pi nR' on the covering line. The displacement can be negative, while the physical length is ∣ΔYij,n′∣|\Delta Y'_{ij,n}|.

Two directed strings end on different images of the same second brane, giving displacements one third and minus two thirds of the dual circumference

The universal cover is drawn in units of 2πR′2\pi R'. For θi=0\theta_i=0 and θj=2π/3\theta_j=2\pi/3, the n=0n=0 and n=−1n=-1 sectors end at two images of the same physical brane jj. The arrows show signed displacement from ii to jj, and Rp=ΔY′/(2πR′)Rp=\Delta Y'/(2\pi R'). Their lengths are 2πR′/32\pi R'/3 and 4πR′/34\pi R'/3, respectively. The positions and spacings are quantitative; the vertical offsets only separate the arrows.

Changing a chosen lift of a phase is a large gauge transformation. The simultaneous relabeling

θi⟼θi+2πki,n⟼n+ki−kj,ki∈Z,\theta_i\longmapsto\theta_i+2\pi k_i, \qquad n\longmapsto n+k_i-k_j, \qquad k_i\in\mathbb Z,

leaves both pij,np_{ij,n} and ΔYij,n′\Delta Y'_{ij,n} invariant. Likewise, reversing the string sends (i,j,n)(i,j,n) to (j,i,−n)(j,i,-n) and reverses the momentum and displacement. The mass is unchanged. Hermiticity pairs the Fourier coefficients as Ψji,−n=Ψij,n∗\Psi_{ji,-n}=\Psi_{ij,n}^*.

Coincident branes and unbroken gauge symmetry

Section titled “Coincident branes and unbroken gauge symmetry”

For the vector branch, one compact direction contributes

Mij,n2=1R2(n+θj−θi2π)2.M_{ij,n}^2=\frac1{R^2}\left(n+\frac{\theta_j-\theta_i}{2\pi}\right)^2.

A vector is massless when the endpoints coincide modulo the dual circle, even if the chosen lifts differ. At a generic set of distinct eigenphases, only the diagonal components survive as massless gauge fields. If the eigenvalues of WW have multiplicities N1,…,NsN_1,\ldots,N_s, the unbroken group is

U(N)⟶∏r=1sU(Nr),∑rNr=N.U(N)\longrightarrow\prod_{r=1}^sU(N_r), \qquad \sum_rN_r=N.

Why does the holonomy, rather than a selected numerical logarithm AYA_Y, determine the answer? An infinitesimal unbroken gauge transformation is covariantly constant around the circle:

DYλ=0⟹λ(Y)=eiAYYλ0e−iAYY.D_Y\lambda=0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \lambda(Y)=e^{iA_YY}\lambda_0e^{-iA_YY}.

Periodicity requires Wλ0W−1=λ0W\lambda_0W^{-1}=\lambda_0. Thus the unbroken Lie algebra is the centralizer of WW. Within each equal-eigenphase block, all Hermitian matrices are allowed, giving U(Nr)U(N_r). Two unequal numerical entries of AYA_Y can differ by an integer multiple of 1/R1/R; the associated covariantly constant field then has a nonzero Fourier label. Requiring [AY,λ0]=0[A_Y,\lambda_0]=0 would miss it.

Each off-diagonal complex entry and its conjugate describe two real generators. This is the same counting as the two orientations of a string connecting a pair of branes; they are not two unrelated Hermitian matrix fields.

Three vector-mass parabolas have a periodic lowest envelope, with zeros at integer phase differences and positive crossings at half-integers

For the vector branch, R2Mn2=(n+u)2R^2M_n^2=(n+u)^2 with u=(θj−θi)/(2π)u=(\theta_j-\theta_i)/(2\pi). The plotted sectors are n=−1,0,1n=-1,0,1 and the thicker segments give the smallest mass on −1≤u≤1-1\le u\le1. Integer uu gives coincident branes modulo the circle and a massless vector. Crossings at u=±1/2u=\pm1/2 instead have R2M2=1/4R^2M^2=1/4. Both axes are dimensionless. Large gauge transformations permute the smooth sector curves; the bosonic ground-state branch is not shown.

For example, phases θ/(2π)=(0,1/3,1,4/3)\theta/(2\pi)=(0,1/3,1,4/3) give two coincident pairs and U(2)×U(2)U(2)\times U(2), although the displayed connection has four distinct diagonal entries. Exercise 2 constructs all eight generators. Such enhancement can occur at any circle radius. It is distinct from the extra closed-string gauge bosons at the bosonic self-dual radius on the previous page.

Gauge fields and transverse displacement fields

Section titled “Gauge fields and transverse displacement fields”

At coincidence, a bosonic level-one state is ϵMα−1M∣k;ij⟩\epsilon_M\alpha_{-1}^M|k;ij\rangle. Split its polarization into directions a=0,…,pa=0,\ldots,p tangent to the brane and transverse directions II. To identify the corresponding local boundary operators, use the upper half-plane with z=t+isz=t+is and inward normal coordinate s≥0s\ge0.

Neumann and Dirichlet doubling respectively give

Xa=XLa(z)+XLa(zˉ),YI=y0I+YLI(z)−YLI(zˉ).X^a=X_L^a(z)+X_L^a(\bar z), \qquad Y^I=y_0^I+Y_L^I(z)-Y_L^I(\bar z).

On the boundary,

∂tXa=2∂XLa,∂sYI=2i∂YLI,∂tYI=0.\partial_tX^a=2\partial X_L^a, \qquad \partial_sY^I=2i\partial Y_L^I, \qquad \partial_tY^I=0.

The normal derivative is essential: a tangential derivative of the fixed Dirichlet value would vanish. A normalized matter vertex is

Uϵ=12α′:(iϵa∂tXa+ϵI∂sYI)eik⋅X∥:.U_\epsilon=\frac1{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}: \bigl(i\epsilon_a\partial_tX^a+\epsilon_I\partial_sY^I\bigr)e^{ik\cdot X_\parallel}:.

In the doubled chiral description this becomes

Uϵ=i2α′:ϵM∂XLMe2ikaXLa:.U_\epsilon=i\sqrt{\frac2{\alpha'}}: \epsilon_M\partial X_L^M e^{2ik_aX_L^a}:.

Both the tangential and normal currents have the same unit two-point normalization. The relative ii in the first expression follows from Euclidean doubling, not from changing the earlier Lorentzian duality signs.

Let E=:e2ikaXLa:E=:e^{2ik_aX_L^a}:. Its boundary dimension is hE=α′k2h_E=\alpha'k^2. Using the free-boson OPE and T=−α′−1:∂XL⋅∂XL:T=-\alpha'^{-1}:\partial X_L\cdot\partial X_L: gives

T(z)Uϵ(w)∼2α′ ϵ⋅k E(w)(z−w)3+(1+α′k2)Uϵ(w)(z−w)2+∂Uϵ(w)z−w.T(z)U_\epsilon(w)\sim \frac{\sqrt{2\alpha'}\,\epsilon\cdot k\,E(w)}{(z-w)^3} +\frac{(1+\alpha'k^2)U_\epsilon(w)}{(z-w)^2} +\frac{\partial U_\epsilon(w)}{z-w}.

The cubic pole arises when one derivative in TT contracts with the derivative in UU and the other with the exponential. Vanishing of this pole and weight one require

k2=0,kaϵa=0.k^2=0, \qquad k^a\epsilon_a=0.

There is also the longitudinal equivalence ϵa∼ϵa+λka\epsilon_a\sim\epsilon_a+\lambda k_a. Indeed, its matter vertex is (λ/2α′)∂tE(\lambda/\sqrt{2\alpha'})\partial_tE. The integrated insertion is a total derivative, while the unintegrated vertex cUcU is BRST exact because a weight-zero scalar satisfies [QB,E]=c∂E[Q_B,E]=c\partial E. This is the physical quotient derived earlier, now with momentum restricted to the worldvolume.

For nonzero null kak_a and p≥1p\ge1, the tangent vector has (p+1)−2=p−1(p+1)-2=p-1 physical polarizations. None of the D−p−1D-p-1 transverse polarizations is removed by this longitudinal quotient. Therefore

(p−1)+(D−p−1)=D−2.(p-1)+(D-p-1)=D-2.

They are a worldvolume gauge field AaA_a and transverse scalars ΦI\Phi^I. For the GSO-projected Type II string, the analogous NS state uses ψ−1/2M\psi_{-1/2}^M and gives eight bosonic polarizations; its R partner gives eight fermionic polarizations. The superstring vertex also needs the fermion and ghost terms explained on the NSR vertex page. The bosonic expression above is not its complete zero-picture representative.

A D0-brane requires a different interpretation: its worldvolume is quantum mechanics, A0A_0 is a nondynamical gauge field, and the transverse scalars are matrix coordinates. There is no nonzero null momentum in a one-dimensional worldvolume to which the preceding polarization count could be applied. Similarly, the displayed local plane-wave operators describe coincident parallel boundaries; a general operator changing one separated boundary condition into another requires additional construction.

The constant Wilson-line relation already fixes the normalization of the position field. After duality, a slowly varying transverse matrix field enters as

XI(ξ)=y0I1+2πα′ΦI(ξ).X^I(\xi)=y_0^I\mathbf1+2\pi\alpha'\Phi^I(\xi).

Thus [ΦI]=length−1[\Phi^I]=\mathrm{length}^{-1}, while XIX^I is a target-space length. A normal boundary derivative couples to a displacement of the prescribed endpoint position. The massless transverse oscillator therefore describes a dynamical displacement of the brane, even though a given worldsheet calculation starts with fixed background positions.

For commuting Hermitian ΦI\Phi^I, simultaneous diagonalization identifies their eigenvalues with individual brane positions divided by 2πα′2\pi\alpha'. Permuting identical branes gives the same configuration. Noncommuting matrices need not have simultaneous ordinary positions. The normalization and this geometric interpretation are developed in Tong, section 7.7.

The gauge-theory description of stretching

Section titled “The gauge-theory description of stretching”

The leading two-derivative gauge/scalar action follows from dimensional reduction. For the BPS Type II stack it is the bosonic part of reduced ten-dimensional super Yang–Mills theory; the bosonic string has an analogous gauge sector alongside its unstable tachyon. Decompose the higher-dimensional field strength as

FaI=DaΦI,FIJ=−i[ΦI,ΦJ].F_{aI}=D_a\Phi^I, \qquad F_{IJ}=-i[\Phi^I,\Phi^J].

With the fundamental matrix trace and tr⁡(TATB)=δAB/2\operatorname{tr}(T^AT^B)=\delta^{AB}/2, the action is

Sgauge=−12gYM,p2∫dp+1ξ tr⁡[FabFab+2DaΦIDaΦI−[ΦI,ΦJ][ΦI,ΦJ]].\begin{aligned} S_{\rm gauge}=-\frac1{2g_{\rm YM,p}^2}\int d^{p+1}\xi\, \operatorname{tr}\bigl[&F_{ab}F^{ab}+2D_a\Phi^I D^a\Phi^I\\ &-[\Phi^I,\Phi^J][\Phi^I,\Phi^J]\bigr]. \end{aligned}

The mixed components occur twice in the higher-dimensional contraction. The rest energy and fermions are omitted. The same matrix normalization is used in the String II brane definitions; the value of the coupling is derived from the brane action there.

The scalar potential is

V=−12gYM,p2∑I,Jtr⁡[ΦI,ΦJ]2≥0.V=-\frac1{2g_{\rm YM,p}^2}\sum_{I,J}\operatorname{tr}[\Phi^I,\Phi^J]^2\ge0.

A commutator of Hermitian matrices is anti-Hermitian, so the minus sign is required for nonnegative energy. The minima of this gauge-sector potential are commuting matrices. This statement does not establish stability of the full bosonic string background.

For two diagonal branes, set vI=ϕ1I−ϕ2Iv^I=\phi_1^I-\phi_2^I. The off-diagonal vector obtains its mass from DaΦID_a\Phi^I, and canonical normalization gives

MW2=∣v∣2=∣X1−X2∣2(2πα′)2.M_W^2=|v|^2=\frac{|X_1-X_2|^2}{(2\pi\alpha')^2}.

This agrees with the free-string vector branch. For p≥1p\ge1 and nonzero separation, one off-diagonal scalar becomes the longitudinal polarization of the massive vector. Exercise 5 derives both the vector mass and the remaining scalar mass matrix, including their normalization.

This gauge theory retains energies and derivatives well below 1/α′1/\sqrt{\alpha'}. A very long stretched string obeys the free-string mass formula but is too heavy to keep in that low-energy truncation. The dual string coupling also changes as gs′=gsα′/Rg_s'=g_s\sqrt{\alpha'}/R; a small original radius need not give weakly coupled dual branes. Nonlinear brane dynamics, tachyon condensation and RR charges are the subject of the next page.

Changing endpoint labels halfway through a calculation. With the inherited derivative and Fourier factor, the momentum contains θj−θi\theta_j-\theta_i. Reversing orientation also reverses the image label. A mass squared can hide a sign error that an oriented displacement exposes.

Using a connection eigenvalue instead of its holonomy. Equal eigenphases modulo 2π2\pi give coincident dual branes. The missing generator may have nonzero Fourier label in a gauge where the displayed connection eigenvalues differ.

Identifying all massless states with gauge enhancement. The vector branch gives gauge generators at coincidence. A bosonic ground-state threshold can instead give a massless scalar at finite separation, and the bosonic vacuum remains unstable.

1. Two oscillator phases and the worldsheet Hamiltonian

Section titled “1. Two oscillator phases and the worldsheet Hamiltonian”

For real AA, BB and pp, dualize

Y=2α′pτ+Acos⁡σcos⁡τ+Bcos⁡2σsin⁡2τ.Y=2\alpha'p\tau+A\cos\sigma\cos\tau+B\cos2\sigma\sin2\tau.

Verify the endpoint conditions and compute the contribution of this coordinate to the worldsheet Hamiltonian. Explain why it is not by itself the target-space energy of a physical string.

Solution

Integrating the two derivative relations gives, up to an additive constant,

Y~=2α′pσ−Asin⁡σsin⁡τ+Bsin⁡2σcos⁡2τ.\widetilde Y=2\alpha'p\sigma-A\sin\sigma\sin\tau+B\sin2\sigma\cos2\tau.

For example, ∂τY~=−Asin⁡σcos⁡τ−2Bsin⁡2σsin⁡2τ=∂σY\partial_\tau\widetilde Y=-A\sin\sigma\cos\tau-2B\sin2\sigma\sin2\tau=\partial_\sigma Y. Its spatial derivative is 2α′p−Acos⁡σsin⁡τ+2Bcos⁡2σcos⁡2τ=∂τY2\alpha'p-A\cos\sigma\sin\tau+2B\cos2\sigma\cos2\tau=\partial_\tau Y. Both oscillators have zero Neumann slope at σ=0,π\sigma=0,\pi, and both dual oscillators vanish there. The dual endpoint displacement is 2πα′p2\pi\alpha'p.

The coordinate Hamiltonian is

HY=14πα′∫0πdσ [(∂τY)2+(∂σY)2].H_Y=\frac1{4\pi\alpha'}\int_0^\pi d\sigma\, [(\partial_\tau Y)^2+(\partial_\sigma Y)^2].

Orthogonality removes cross terms between the constant, the first harmonic and the second harmonic. Each squared sine or cosine integrates to π/2\pi/2. For a real mode Ccos⁡mσcos⁡mτC\cos m\sigma\cos m\tau, the remaining sum of squared time factors is one and the contribution is m2C2/(8α′)m^2C^2/(8\alpha'). Hence

HY=α′p2+A28α′+B22α′.H_Y=\alpha'p^2+\frac{A^2}{8\alpha'}+\frac{B^2}{2\alpha'}.

Duality swaps the two derivatives pointwise, so the original and dual Hamiltonian densities agree before integration. The momentum contribution becomes the gradient contribution ΔY~2/(4π2α′)\Delta\widetilde Y^2/(4\pi^2\alpha').

This is one spatial coordinate’s contribution to the generator of worldsheet time. A physical embedding must also satisfy the constraints involving target time and the other coordinates. Target-space energy is the momentum conjugate to X0X^0; it is not HYH_Y for this isolated coordinate.

Take θ/(2π)=(0,1/3,1,4/3)\theta/(2\pi)=(0,1/3,1,4/3). Find every massless vector sector (i,j,n)(i,j,n) and the unbroken group. Construct its covariantly constant generators and explain how a large gauge transformation makes them ordinary zero modes.

Solution

Write ai=θi/(2π)a_i=\theta_i/(2\pi). The massless condition is n=ai−aj∈Zn=a_i-a_j\in\mathbb Z. The sectors are

(1,1,0), (2,2,0), (3,3,0), (4,4,0),(1,3,−1), (3,1,1), (2,4,−1), (4,2,1).\begin{gathered} (1,1,0),\ (2,2,0),\ (3,3,0),\ (4,4,0),\\ (1,3,-1),\ (3,1,1),\ (2,4,-1),\ (4,2,1). \end{gathered}

For each pair, the covariantly constant matrix is

λij(Y)=ei(ai−aj)Y/REij.\lambda_{ij}(Y)=e^{i(a_i-a_j)Y/R}E_{ij}.

It solves DYλij=0D_Y\lambda_{ij}=0 and is periodic precisely for the listed pairs. The conjugate entries pair into two Hermitian generators, λij+λji\lambda_{ij}+\lambda_{ji} and −i(λij−λji)-i(\lambda_{ij}-\lambda_{ji}). Along with the four diagonal generators, there are eight real generators. The equal-holonomy blocks are {1,3}\{1,3\} and {2,4}\{2,4\}, giving U(2)×U(2)U(2)\times U(2).

Choose the integer phase shifts k=(0,0,−1,−1)k=(0,0,-1,-1). The new phases are (0,1/3,0,1/3)(0,1/3,0,1/3). Under n′=n+ki−kjn'=n+k_i-k_j, all eight listed generators have n′=0n'=0. The corresponding periodic gauge transformation is U=diag⁡(eikiY/R)U=\operatorname{diag}(e^{ik_iY/R}); it shifts AiA_i by ki/Rk_i/R and multiplies an adjoint component by ei(ki−kj)Y/Re^{i(k_i-k_j)Y/R}.

Before this transformation, the four numerical eigenvalues of AYA_Y were distinct. Its constant-matrix commutant was only U(1)4U(1)^4, which missed the covariantly constant Fourier modes. The centralizer of WW gives the same correct answer in either description. Reversal pairs (1,3,−1)(1,3,-1) with (3,1,1)(3,1,1), not with a sector of the same Fourier label.

3. Two Wilson lines require simultaneous coincidence

Section titled “3. Two Wilson lines require simultaneous coincidence”

On a rectangular two-torus of radii R1,R2R_1,R_2, take commuting flat holonomies with phase vectors

θ(1)2π=(0,1/3,1,4/3),θ(2)2π=(0,0,1/2,1/2).\frac{\theta^{(1)}}{2\pi}=(0,1/3,1,4/3), \qquad \frac{\theta^{(2)}}{2\pi}=(0,0,1/2,1/2).

Determine the vector mass formula and unbroken gauge group after dualizing both circles. Each holonomy separately has a U(2)×U(2)U(2)\times U(2) centralizer. Why is their union not the answer?

Solution

Commuting unitary holonomies can be simultaneously diagonalized. Their two momenta and dual displacements are

pij,nA(A)=nA+aj(A)−ai(A)RA,ΔYij,nA′(A)=2πRA′(nA+aj(A)−ai(A)),A=1,2.\begin{aligned} p^{(A)}_{ij,n_A}&=\frac{n_A+a_j^{(A)}-a_i^{(A)}}{R_A},\\ \Delta Y^{\prime(A)}_{ij,n_A}&=2\pi R_A'\bigl(n_A+a_j^{(A)}-a_i^{(A)}\bigr), \qquad A=1,2. \end{aligned}

Here ai(A)=θi(A)/(2π)a_i^{(A)}=\theta_i^{(A)}/(2\pi) and RA′=α′/RAR_A'=\alpha'/R_A. On the vector branch,

M2=∑A=12(nA+aj(A)−ai(A))2RA2=∣ΔY′∣2(2πα′)2.M^2=\sum_{A=1}^2\frac{(n_A+a_j^{(A)}-a_i^{(A)})^2}{R_A^2} =\frac{|\Delta\boldsymbol Y'|^2}{(2\pi\alpha')^2}.

Every term is nonnegative. Masslessness requires coincidence in both circles. The first holonomy groups {1,3}\{1,3\} and {2,4}\{2,4\}; the second groups {1,2}\{1,2\} and {3,4}\{3,4\}. Their joint ordered eigenphase pairs are all distinct, so only i=ji=j remains and the group is U(1)4U(1)^4.

The unbroken Lie algebra is the intersection of the two centralizers. A mode massless in only one circle still receives a positive mass from the other. This is why the union overcounts. The assumption of commuting flat holonomies is essential to this simultaneous-position description; no conclusion about noncommuting flux backgrounds follows from it.

Let ν\nu be a unit spatial normal to a flat codimension-one brane. Construct the normal and tangent projectors and the reflection matrix R\mathcal R. Show that the boundary gluing ∂ˉX=R∂X\bar\partial X=\mathcal R\partial X preserves the stress tensor. Derive the normal scalar and tangent vector operators without rotating the brane onto a coordinate axis.

Solution

In the spatial subspace, set

PD=ννT,PN=1−PD,R=PN−PD=1−2ννT.P_D=\nu\nu^T, \qquad P_N=1-P_D, \qquad \mathcal R=P_N-P_D=1-2\nu\nu^T.

The projectors are orthogonal and sum to the identity. Consequently RTR=1\mathcal R^T\mathcal R=1 and R2=1\mathcal R^2=1. Extend R\mathcal R to leave target time invariant; then RTηR=η\mathcal R^T\eta\mathcal R=\eta. The gluing gives

Tˉ=−1α′:∂ˉX⋅∂ˉX:=−1α′:∂X⋅∂X:=T.\bar T=-\frac1{\alpha'}:\bar\partial X\cdot\bar\partial X: =-\frac1{\alpha'}:\partial X\cdot\partial X:=T.

Thus there is no stress-energy flux through the boundary. At z=t+isz=t+is, the derivatives become

∂tX=(1+R)∂XL=2PN∂XL,∂sX=i(1−R)∂XL=2iPD∂XL.\partial_tX=(1+\mathcal R)\partial X_L=2P_N\partial X_L, \qquad \partial_sX=i(1-\mathcal R)\partial X_L=2iP_D\partial X_L.

In particular PD∂tX=PN∂sX=0P_D\partial_tX=P_N\partial_sX=0. For tangent ϵ∥\epsilon_\parallel and normal ϵ⊥\epsilon_\perp, the normalized currents are

J∥=i2α′ϵ∥⋅∂tX,J⊥=12α′ϵ⊥⋅∂sX.J_\parallel=\frac{i}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}\epsilon_\parallel\cdot\partial_tX, \qquad J_\perp=\frac1{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}\epsilon_\perp\cdot\partial_sX.

Both equal i2/α′ ϵ⋅∂XLi\sqrt{2/\alpha'}\,\epsilon\cdot\partial X_L in their projected subspaces. Since ∂XLM(z)∂XLN(w)∼−α′ηMN/[2(z−w)2]\partial X_L^M(z)\partial X_L^N(w)\sim-\alpha'\eta^{MN}/[2(z-w)^2], either current has two-point coefficient ϵ⋅ϵ′\epsilon\cdot\epsilon'. The mixed coefficient vanishes by projector orthogonality. Omitting the normal derivative’s Euclidean ii would give the wrong sign.

Multiply by eik⋅X∥e^{ik\cdot X_\parallel} with PDk=0P_Dk=0. The same cubic stress-tensor pole imposes k⋅ϵ∥=0k\cdot\epsilon_\parallel=0, and ϵ∥∼ϵ∥+λk\epsilon_\parallel\sim\epsilon_\parallel+\lambda k is the longitudinal quotient. The normal polarization is unaffected. Thus tilting the brane changes neither the physical count nor the interpretation of the scalar. The nonzero-null-momentum count still requires p≥1p\ge1; it is not a worldline polarization formula for D0-branes.

For p≥1p\ge1, expand the leading gauge theory around two diagonal branes with vI=ϕ1I−ϕ2I≠0v^I=\phi_1^I-\phi_2^I\ne0. Keep an off-diagonal vector WaW_a and scalar χI\chi^I, together with their Hermitian conjugates. Derive the canonically normalized vector and scalar masses, identify the Goldstone direction, and compare with the stretched-string mass.

Solution

Write the off-diagonal fields as

Aa=(0WaWa∗0),δΦI=(0χIχI∗0).A_a=\begin{pmatrix}0&W_a\\W_a^*&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \delta\Phi^I=\begin{pmatrix}0&\chi^I\\\chi^{I*}&0\end{pmatrix}.

With g=gYM,pg=g_{\rm YM,p}, the scalar covariant derivative has upper-right entry ∂aχI+ivIWa\partial_a\chi^I+iv^IW_a. The trace includes both conjugate entries, so its quadratic Lagrangian is −2∑I∣∂aχI+ivIWa∣2/g2-2\sum_I|\partial_a\chi^I+iv^IW_a|^2/g^2. If fab=∂aWb−∂bWaf_{ab}=\partial_aW_b-\partial_bW_a, the vector kinetic term is −fab∗fab/g2-f_{ab}^*f^{ab}/g^2.

For the potential, the linearized commutator has upper-right entry zIJ=vIχJ−vJχIz_{IJ}=v^I\chi^J-v^J\chi^I and lower-left entry −zIJ∗-z_{IJ}^*. Therefore

tr⁡[ΦI,ΦJ]2=−2∣zIJ∣2,∑I,J∣zIJ∣2=2(∣v∣2∣χ∣2−∣v⋅χ∣2).\operatorname{tr}[\Phi^I,\Phi^J]^2=-2|z_{IJ}|^2, \qquad \sum_{I,J}|z_{IJ}|^2=2\bigl(|v|^2|\chi|^2-|v\cdot\chi|^2\bigr).

The second factor of two comes from the ordered sum over transverse indices. Thus

V(2)=2g2(∣v∣2∣χ∣2−∣v⋅χ∣2).V^{(2)}=\frac2{g^2}\bigl(|v|^2|\chi|^2-|v\cdot\chi|^2\bigr).

Use Wac=2Wa/gW_a^{\rm c}=\sqrt2W_a/g and χIc=2χI/g\chi^{I\rm c}=\sqrt2\chi^I/g. These give the usual complex-vector kinetic term −∣fc∣2/2-|f^{\rm c}|^2/2 and complex-scalar term −∣∂χc∣2-|\partial\chi^{\rm c}|^2. The mass terms then yield

MW2=∣v∣2,(Mχ2)IJ=∣v∣2δIJ−vIvJ.M_W^2=|v|^2, \qquad (\mathcal M_\chi^2)_{IJ}=|v|^2\delta_{IJ}-v_Iv_J.

A gauge parameter with upper-right entry λ\lambda acts at this order as δWa=∂aλ\delta W_a=\partial_a\lambda and δχI=−ivIλ\delta\chi^I=-iv^I\lambda. Hence ∂aχI+ivIWa\partial_a\chi^I+iv^IW_a is gauge invariant. The scalar along vIv^I lies in the kernel of the potential matrix and can be removed by a gauge choice; its degree of freedom becomes the longitudinal polarization of the massive vector. Scalars orthogonal to vv have mass squared ∣v∣2|v|^2.

Since X1−X2=2πα′vX_1-X_2=2\pi\alpha'v, the vector mass is exactly ∣X1−X2∣/(2πα′)|X_1-X_2|/(2\pi\alpha'). For p≥1p\ge1, a massless vector’s p−1p-1 polarizations plus the eaten scalar become a massive vector’s pp polarizations. The total physical count is unchanged. For D0-branes, A0A_0 enforces a gauge constraint instead; it does not become a propagating massive vector by this count.

The action is a low-energy truncation. Keeping these off-diagonal fields requires ∣v∣≪1/α′|v|\ll1/\sqrt{\alpha'} and small derivative scales. The free-string mass formula extends to larger separation, but this does not make the truncated action an exact non-Abelian DBI theory or remove the bosonic tachyon.

6. Uniform branes and a resummed lattice factor

Section titled “6. Uniform branes and a resummed lattice factor”

Let θj=2πj/N\theta_j=2\pi j/N, j=0,…,N−1j=0,\ldots,N-1, and A>0A>0. Evaluate the compact Gaussian sum

Zlat(A)=∑i,j=0N−1∑n∈Ze−A(n+(j−i)/N)2.Z_{\rm lat}(A)=\sum_{i,j=0}^{N-1}\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z} e^{-A(n+(j-i)/N)^2}.

Derive it by reindexing and by Poisson summation. Explain the multiplicities and the role of ∣tr⁡Ww∣2|\operatorname{tr}W^w|^2. State what part of an annulus calculation has, and has not, been obtained.

Solution

Set m=Nn+j−im=Nn+j-i. For each integer mm and each choice of ii, there is exactly one j∈{0,…,N−1}j\in\{0,\ldots,N-1\} satisfying j≡m+i(modN)j\equiv m+i\pmod N, and then one integer nn. Hence each mm occurs NN times:

Zlat(A)=N∑m∈Ze−A(m/N)2.Z_{\rm lat}(A)=N\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}e^{-A(m/N)^2}.

Poisson summation of this Gaussian gives

Zlat(A)=N2πA∑ℓ∈Ze−π2N2ℓ2/A.Z_{\rm lat}(A)=N^2\sqrt{\frac\pi A} \sum_{\ell\in\mathbb Z}e^{-\pi^2N^2\ell^2/A}.

Alternatively, apply the shifted Gaussian identity before summing endpoints:

∑n∈Ze−A(n+u)2=πA∑w∈Ze−π2w2/Ae2πiwu.\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}e^{-A(n+u)^2} =\sqrt{\frac\pi A}\sum_{w\in\mathbb Z}e^{-\pi^2w^2/A}e^{2\pi iwu}.

For u=(θj−θi)/(2π)u=(\theta_j-\theta_i)/(2\pi), the endpoint sum of its phase is

∑i,jeiw(θj−θi)=∣tr⁡Ww∣2.\sum_{i,j}e^{iw(\theta_j-\theta_i)} =\left|\operatorname{tr}W^w\right|^2.

Uniform phases form the NNth roots of unity. Their geometric series gives tr⁡Ww=N\operatorname{tr}W^w=N when NN divides ww and zero otherwise. Inserting this result restricts w=Nℓw=N\ell and reproduces the previous answer, including the factor N2N^2.

The winding-language expression makes interference between the brane phases explicit. It is a transformation of the compact lattice factor only. Oscillator determinants, ghosts, the proper modular measure and the rest of the spacetime directions have not been included. No complete annulus amplitude, tadpole cancellation condition or stable bosonic vacuum follows from this Gaussian identity.

  • Joseph Polchinski, “TASI Lectures on D-Branes,” in Fields, Strings and Duality, TASI 1996, edited by C. Efthimiou and B. Greene (World Scientific, 1997), pp. 293–356, arXiv:hep-th/9611050, especially sections 2.3–2.4 on open-string duality, Wilson lines and brane fluctuations.
  • David Tong, String Theory, University of Cambridge Part III lecture notes (2009; revised 2012), arXiv:0908.0333, sections 7.7 and 8.3.2–8.3.3 on matrix-valued brane fields, stretched strings and Type II D-branes.