Skip to content

Worldsheet Symmetries, Boundary Conditions, and Conformal Gauge

The Polyakov action introduced an independent worldsheet metric hαβh_{\alpha\beta}. At first sight this looks like we have enlarged the theory: instead of the embedding fields Xμ(τ,σ)X^\mu(\tau,\sigma) alone, we now also integrate or vary over a two-dimensional metric. The point of the Polyakov formulation is that the extra fields are pure gauge, up to subtle global information that will become important in string perturbation theory.

In flat target space the Lorentzian Polyakov action is

SP=14παΣd2σhhαβαXμβXμ.S_P = -\frac{1}{4\pi\alpha'} \int_\Sigma d^2\sigma\,\sqrt{-h}\,h^{\alpha\beta} \partial_\alpha X^\mu\partial_\beta X_\mu.

Equivalently, with T=1/(2πα)T=1/(2\pi\alpha'),

SP=T2Σd2σhhαβαXβX.S_P = -\frac{T}{2} \int_\Sigma d^2\sigma\,\sqrt{-h}\,h^{\alpha\beta} \partial_\alpha X\cdot\partial_\beta X.

This page explains why one can locally choose the simple conformal gauge

hαβ=ηαβ=(1001),h_{\alpha\beta}=\eta_{\alpha\beta} =\begin{pmatrix}-1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix},

and what equations remain after doing so. The most important lesson is this: even after setting hαβh_{\alpha\beta} to the flat metric, one must still impose the metric equation of motion

Tαβ=0.T_{\alpha\beta}=0.

These are the classical Virasoro constraints.

The Polyakov action has three basic symmetries. Two are gauge symmetries of the worldsheet description; the third is an ordinary global spacetime symmetry.

A change of worldsheet coordinates

σασ~α(σ)\sigma^\alpha\mapsto \widetilde\sigma^\alpha(\sigma)

is a gauge redundancy. The embedding coordinates are worldsheet scalars,

X~μ(σ~)=Xμ(σ),\widetilde X^\mu(\widetilde\sigma)=X^\mu(\sigma),

while the worldsheet metric transforms as a tensor,

h~αβ(σ~)=σρσ~ασλσ~βhρλ(σ).\widetilde h_{\alpha\beta}(\widetilde\sigma) = \frac{\partial \sigma^\rho}{\partial \widetilde\sigma^\alpha} \frac{\partial \sigma^\lambda}{\partial \widetilde\sigma^\beta} h_{\rho\lambda}(\sigma).

Because d2σhd^2\sigma\sqrt{-h} is invariant and hαβαXβXh^{\alpha\beta}\partial_\alpha X\cdot\partial_\beta X is a scalar, SPS_P is invariant. This is the string analogue of reparametrization invariance of the relativistic particle.

In infinitesimal active notation, with a vector field ξα(σ)\xi^\alpha(\sigma),

δξXμ=ξααXμ,\delta_\xi X^\mu=-\xi^\alpha\partial_\alpha X^\mu,

and

δξhαβ=αξββξα.\delta_\xi h_{\alpha\beta} =-\nabla_\alpha\xi_\beta-\nabla_\beta\xi_\alpha.

The sign convention is not important; what matters is that two arbitrary functions ξτ\xi^\tau and ξσ\xi^\sigma are available for gauge fixing.

The special feature of the string worldsheet is that it is two-dimensional. In two dimensions, the Polyakov action is invariant under local rescalings of the metric,

hαβ(σ)e2ω(σ)hαβ(σ).h_{\alpha\beta}(\sigma) \mapsto e^{2\omega(\sigma)}h_{\alpha\beta}(\sigma).

Indeed,

hαβe2ωhαβ,he2ωh,h^{\alpha\beta}\mapsto e^{-2\omega}h^{\alpha\beta}, \qquad \sqrt{-h}\mapsto e^{2\omega}\sqrt{-h},

so the two factors cancel. This is Weyl invariance.

Weyl invariance has a crucial consequence: the stress tensor obtained by varying the metric is classically traceless,

Tαα=0.T^\alpha{}_{\alpha}=0.

Quantum mechanically this statement is subtle. Weyl invariance may be anomalous, and the requirement that the anomaly vanish will eventually lead to the critical dimension of the bosonic string, D=26D=26.

In flat target space the action is also invariant under

XμΛμνXν+aμ,ΛTηΛ=η.X^\mu\mapsto \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu X^\nu+a^\mu, \qquad \Lambda^T\eta\Lambda=\eta.

This is not a worldsheet gauge symmetry. It is the usual global spacetime Poincare symmetry. Its Noether currents give the conserved spacetime momentum and angular momentum of a string; those currents will be useful in the next lecture note when we discuss rotating string solutions and Regge trajectories.

The three basic symmetries of the Polyakov action.

The Polyakov action has two local worldsheet gauge symmetries, diffeomorphism and Weyl invariance, plus global target-space Poincare invariance.

A symmetric two-dimensional metric has three independent local components:

hαβ=hβα(hττ,hτσ,hσσ).h_{\alpha\beta}=h_{\beta\alpha} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad (h_{\tau\tau},h_{\tau\sigma},h_{\sigma\sigma}).

Worldsheet diffeomorphisms provide two arbitrary local functions, and Weyl invariance provides one more. Thus, locally, the gauge freedom is large enough to remove all three components of hαβh_{\alpha\beta}.

More geometrically, every two-dimensional metric is locally conformally flat. Therefore we can write

hαβ(τ,σ)=e2ϕ(τ,σ)ηαβh_{\alpha\beta}(\tau,\sigma) =e^{2\phi(\tau,\sigma)}\eta_{\alpha\beta}

in Lorentzian signature, or

hαβ(σ1,σ2)=e2ϕ(σ1,σ2)δαβh_{\alpha\beta}(\sigma^1,\sigma^2) =e^{2\phi(\sigma^1,\sigma^2)}\delta_{\alpha\beta}

in Euclidean signature. Weyl invariance then removes the conformal factor e2ϕe^{2\phi}.

So, locally, we may choose

hαβ=ηαβ.h_{\alpha\beta}=\eta_{\alpha\beta}.

This is conformal gauge.

Gauge fixing of a two-dimensional metric to conformal gauge.

A two-dimensional metric has three local components. Two diffeomorphism functions and one Weyl function locally reduce it to the flat metric. Global moduli are not shown in this local counting.

Conformal gauge does not completely fix the gauge. Some coordinate transformations change the flat metric only by a Weyl factor, and the Weyl factor can be undone by a Weyl transformation.

Introduce Lorentzian light-cone coordinates on the worldsheet,

σ+=τ+σ,σ=τσ.\sigma^+=\tau+\sigma, \qquad \sigma^-=\tau-\sigma.

Then

ds2=dτ2+dσ2=dσ+dσ.ds^2=-d\tau^2+d\sigma^2 =-d\sigma^+d\sigma^-.

The transformations

σ+f(σ+),σg(σ)\sigma^+\mapsto f(\sigma^+), \qquad \sigma^-\mapsto g(\sigma^-)

give

ds2f(σ+)g(σ)dσ+dσ.ds^2\mapsto -f'(\sigma^+)g'(\sigma^-)\,d\sigma^+d\sigma^-.

This is just the same flat metric multiplied by a local scale factor, so Weyl invariance restores the gauge condition. These residual symmetries are the classical origin of left- and right-moving conformal transformations.

In Euclidean signature one often uses

z=σ1+iσ2,zˉ=σ1iσ2,z=\sigma^1+i\sigma^2, \qquad \bar z=\sigma^1-i\sigma^2,

and residual conformal transformations are holomorphic and antiholomorphic maps,

zf(z),zˉfˉ(zˉ).z\mapsto f(z), \qquad \bar z\mapsto \bar f(\bar z).

This is the bridge from the Polyakov action to two-dimensional conformal field theory.

In conformal gauge the action becomes a free two-dimensional field theory,

Sconf=14παdτdσηαβαXβX.S_{\rm conf} = -\frac{1}{4\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma\,\eta^{\alpha\beta} \partial_\alpha X\cdot\partial_\beta X.

Since ηαβ=diag(1,1)\eta^{\alpha\beta}=\operatorname{diag}(-1,1),

Sconf=14παdτdσ(X˙2X2).S_{\rm conf} = \frac{1}{4\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma\, \left(\dot X^2-X^{\prime 2}\right).

The Euler-Lagrange equation is simply the two-dimensional wave equation,

(τ2σ2)Xμ=0.(\partial_\tau^2-\partial_\sigma^2)X^\mu=0.

Equivalently,

+Xμ=0,±12(τ±σ).\partial_+\partial_-X^\mu=0, \qquad \partial_\pm\equiv \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\tau\pm\partial_\sigma).

Hence every classical solution locally splits into left- and right-moving pieces,

Xμ(τ,σ)=XLμ(τ+σ)+XRμ(τσ).X^\mu(\tau,\sigma)=X_L^\mu(\tau+\sigma)+X_R^\mu(\tau-\sigma).

Boundary conditions and periodicity determine how these pieces are related.

After Wick rotation τ=iτE\tau=-i\tau_E, the Euclidean action is positive for the non-time target coordinates,

SE=14παd2σaXμaXμ,S_E= \frac{1}{4\pi\alpha'} \int d^2\sigma\, \partial_a X^\mu\partial_a X_\mu,

with the usual caveat that the target-space time coordinate carries the Lorentzian minus sign before analytic continuation. The Euclidean action is the one used in conformal field theory path integrals.

The conformal-gauge action is free in the bulk, but the boundary variation is highly meaningful. Varying

Sconf=14παdτdσ(X˙2X2)S_{\rm conf} = \frac{1}{4\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma\, (\dot X^2-X^{\prime 2})

gives

δSconf=12παdτdσδX(τ2σ2)X12παdτ[δXX]σ=0σ=π,\delta S_{\rm conf} = -\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma\, \delta X\cdot(\partial_\tau^2-\partial_\sigma^2)X - \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau\,[\delta X\cdot X']_{\sigma=0}^{\sigma=\pi},

up to possible endpoint terms in τ\tau, which vanish for fixed initial and final configurations.

The bulk term gives the wave equation. The boundary term gives the boundary condition. For a closed string there is no boundary; periodicity makes the endpoint contribution vanish. For an open string, at each endpoint and in each target-space direction, one can impose either of the following conditions.

If the endpoint is free to move in the μ\mu direction, then δXμ\delta X^\mu is arbitrary at the boundary. The boundary term vanishes only if

Xμ=0at σ=0,π.X^{\prime\mu}=0 \qquad \text{at }\sigma=0,\pi.

This is a Neumann boundary condition. It says that no momentum flows off the end of the string in that target-space direction.

Alternatively, we may hold the endpoint fixed in the μ\mu direction. Then

δXμ=0at σ=0,π.\delta X^\mu=0 \qquad \text{at }\sigma=0,\pi.

Equivalently, the endpoint obeys

Xμ(τ,0)=y0μ,Xμ(τ,π)=yπμ,X^\mu(\tau,0)=y_0^\mu, \qquad X^\mu(\tau,\pi)=y_\pi^\mu,

or a suitable generalization if the two endpoints lie on different hypersurfaces. This is a Dirichlet boundary condition.

Neumann and Dirichlet open-string boundary conditions.

Neumann boundary conditions allow the endpoint to move freely along a direction and impose X=0X'=0. Dirichlet boundary conditions fix the endpoint position and impose δX=0\delta X=0.

A particularly important mixed boundary condition is the following. Let

a=0,1,,p,i=p+1,,D1.a=0,1,\ldots,p, \qquad i=p+1,\ldots,D-1.

Impose Neumann boundary conditions along the p+1p+1 directions XaX^a,

σXa=0(a=0,1,,p),\partial_\sigma X^a=0 \qquad (a=0,1,\ldots,p),

and Dirichlet boundary conditions along the remaining transverse directions,

Xi=yi(i=p+1,,D1).X^i=y^i \qquad (i=p+1,\ldots,D-1).

The open-string endpoint is then confined to a (p+1)(p+1)-dimensional spacetime hypersurface, or equivalently a pp-dimensional spatial object. This object is a Dpp-brane. The letter “D” stands for Dirichlet.

An open string ending on a Dp-brane.

A Dpp-brane is the hypersurface swept out by directions with Neumann boundary conditions. The open-string endpoint is pinned in the transverse Dirichlet directions.

At this point D-branes are simply allowed boundary conditions of the open-string variational principle. Later they become dynamical objects carrying gauge fields, scalar fields, tension, and Ramond-Ramond charge.

Stress tensor constraints in conformal gauge

Section titled “Stress tensor constraints in conformal gauge”

Gauge fixing hαβ=ηαβh_{\alpha\beta}=\eta_{\alpha\beta} does not erase the equation obtained by varying hαβh_{\alpha\beta}. The worldsheet stress tensor is

Tαβ=αXβX12hαβhρλρXλX.T_{\alpha\beta} =\partial_\alpha X\cdot\partial_\beta X -\frac{1}{2}h_{\alpha\beta} h^{\rho\lambda} \partial_\rho X\cdot\partial_\lambda X.

The metric equation of motion is

Tαβ=0.T_{\alpha\beta}=0.

In conformal gauge this becomes

Tττ=Tσσ=12(X˙2+X2),Tτσ=X˙X.T_{\tau\tau}=T_{\sigma\sigma} =\frac{1}{2}\left(\dot X^2+X^{\prime 2}\right), \qquad T_{\tau\sigma}=\dot X\cdot X'.

Therefore the constraints are

X˙2+X2=0,X˙X=0.\dot X^2+X^{\prime 2}=0, \qquad \dot X\cdot X'=0.

Equivalently,

(X˙+X)2=0,(X˙X)2=0.(\dot X+X')^2=0, \qquad (\dot X-X')^2=0.

In light-cone worldsheet coordinates this is especially simple:

T++=+X+X=0,T=XX=0.T_{++}=\partial_+X\cdot\partial_+X=0, \qquad T_{--}=\partial_-X\cdot\partial_-X=0.

The normalization of T±±T_{\pm\pm} varies slightly between classical and CFT conventions; the constraint T±±=0T_{\pm\pm}=0 is convention-independent.

Light-cone coordinates on the worldsheet and the Virasoro constraints.

In conformal gauge the residual left- and right-moving directions are σ+=τ+σ\sigma^+=\tau+\sigma and σ=τσ\sigma^-=\tau-\sigma. The metric equation of motion imposes T++=T=0T_{++}=T_{--}=0.

These constraints remove the unphysical longitudinal oscillations. Classically, together with residual conformal transformations, they leave D2D-2 transverse physical degrees of freedom. Quantum mechanically, their mode expansion becomes the Virasoro constraints on string states.

The Polyakov formulation is powerful because it converts the square-root Nambu-Goto action into a free field theory plus constraints:

Sconf=14παdτdσ(X˙2X2),S_{\rm conf} = \frac{1}{4\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma\, (\dot X^2-X^{\prime 2}), (τ2σ2)Xμ=0,(\partial_\tau^2-\partial_\sigma^2)X^\mu=0, T++=T=0.T_{++}=T_{--}=0.

For open strings the variational principle also requires boundary conditions. Neumann directions describe directions along which the endpoint is free to move; Dirichlet directions describe directions transverse to a D-brane.

The next lecture note uses these equations and constraints to analyze explicit classical string solutions, especially the rotating open string that gives the classical Regge relation between spin and mass.

Exercise 1. Weyl invariance is special to two dimensions

Section titled “Exercise 1. Weyl invariance is special to two dimensions”

Consider the generalized action in dd worldsheet dimensions,

Sd=T2ddσhhαβαXβX.S_d=-\frac{T}{2}\int d^d\sigma\sqrt{-h}\,h^{\alpha\beta} \partial_\alpha X\cdot\partial_\beta X.

Under hαβe2ωhαβh_{\alpha\beta}\mapsto e^{2\omega}h_{\alpha\beta}, determine how the integrand scales. For what value of dd is the action Weyl invariant?

Solution

In dd dimensions,

hedωh,hαβe2ωhαβ.\sqrt{-h}\mapsto e^{d\omega}\sqrt{-h}, \qquad h^{\alpha\beta}\mapsto e^{-2\omega}h^{\alpha\beta}.

Thus

hhαβαXβXe(d2)ωhhαβαXβX.\sqrt{-h}\,h^{\alpha\beta} \partial_\alpha X\cdot\partial_\beta X \mapsto e^{(d-2)\omega} \sqrt{-h}\,h^{\alpha\beta} \partial_\alpha X\cdot\partial_\beta X.

The action is Weyl invariant only when

d2=0,d-2=0,

so d=2d=2.

Exercise 2. Derive the open-string boundary term

Section titled “Exercise 2. Derive the open-string boundary term”

Starting from

Sconf=14παdτdσ(X˙2X2),S_{\rm conf}= \frac{1}{4\pi\alpha'}\int d\tau d\sigma\, (\dot X^2-X^{\prime 2}),

show that the boundary term at σ=0,π\sigma=0,\pi is proportional to

[δXX]σ=0σ=π.[\delta X\cdot X']_{\sigma=0}^{\sigma=\pi}.

Explain why this leads to Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions.

Solution

Varying the action gives

δSconf=12παdτdσ(X˙δX˙XδX).\delta S_{\rm conf} =\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma\, (\dot X\cdot\delta\dot X-X'\cdot\delta X').

Integrating by parts in τ\tau and σ\sigma gives

δSconf=12παdτdσδX(τ2σ2)X12παdτ[δXX]0π,\delta S_{\rm conf} =-\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma\, \delta X\cdot(\partial_\tau^2-\partial_\sigma^2)X - \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau\,[\delta X\cdot X']_{0}^{\pi},

where endpoint terms in τ\tau vanish when the initial and final configurations are fixed.

For the boundary term to vanish, one may impose

X=0X'=0

at the boundary, which is Neumann, or

δX=0,\delta X=0,

which is Dirichlet. These choices may be made independently in each target-space direction.

Exercise 3. Residual conformal transformations

Section titled “Exercise 3. Residual conformal transformations”

Show that the transformations

σ+f(σ+),σg(σ)\sigma^+\mapsto f(\sigma^+), \qquad \sigma^-\mapsto g(\sigma^-)

preserve conformal gauge up to a Weyl rescaling.

Solution

In conformal gauge,

ds2=dσ+dσ.ds^2=-d\sigma^+d\sigma^-.

After the transformation,

dσ+f(σ+)dσ+,dσg(σ)dσ.d\sigma^+\mapsto f'(\sigma^+)d\sigma^+, \qquad d\sigma^-\mapsto g'(\sigma^-)d\sigma^-.

Therefore

ds2f(σ+)g(σ)dσ+dσ.ds^2\mapsto -f'(\sigma^+)g'(\sigma^-)d\sigma^+d\sigma^-.

This differs from the original metric only by the local factor

e2ω=f(σ+)g(σ).e^{2\omega}=f'(\sigma^+)g'(\sigma^-).

A Weyl transformation removes this factor, so the combined transformation preserves conformal gauge.

Exercise 4. Equivalent forms of the constraints

Section titled “Exercise 4. Equivalent forms of the constraints”

Prove that

X˙2+X2=0,X˙X=0\dot X^2+X^{\prime 2}=0, \qquad \dot X\cdot X'=0

are equivalent to

(X˙+X)2=0,(X˙X)2=0.(\dot X+X')^2=0, \qquad (\dot X-X')^2=0.
Solution

Compute

(X˙+X)2=X˙2+X2+2X˙X,(\dot X+X')^2 =\dot X^2+X^{\prime 2}+2\dot X\cdot X',

and

(X˙X)2=X˙2+X22X˙X.(\dot X-X')^2 =\dot X^2+X^{\prime 2}-2\dot X\cdot X'.

If

X˙2+X2=0,X˙X=0,\dot X^2+X^{\prime 2}=0, \qquad \dot X\cdot X'=0,

then both squared expressions vanish.

Conversely, if both squared expressions vanish, adding them gives

2(X˙2+X2)=0,2(\dot X^2+X^{\prime 2})=0,

and subtracting them gives

4X˙X=0.4\dot X\cdot X'=0.

Thus the two forms are equivalent.

In DD-dimensional flat spacetime, an open string has Neumann boundary conditions in X0,X1,,XpX^0,X^1,\ldots,X^p and Dirichlet boundary conditions in the remaining directions. How many spatial dimensions does the brane have, and how many transverse scalar fluctuations should one expect on its worldvolume?

Solution

The Neumann directions include time X0X^0 and pp spatial directions X1,,XpX^1,\ldots,X^p. Hence the brane is a Dpp-brane: it has pp spatial dimensions and a (p+1)(p+1)-dimensional worldvolume.

The Dirichlet directions are

Xp+1,,XD1,X^{p+1},\ldots,X^{D-1},

so their number is

D1p=Dp1.D-1-p=D-p-1.

When the D-brane becomes dynamical, its transverse position can fluctuate in each of these directions. Thus one expects Dp1D-p-1 scalar fields on the brane worldvolume.