Skip to content

The Open Superstring Spectrum

An open RNS string has two oscillator sectors. The Neveu–Schwarz sector produces spacetime tensor states, beginning with a tachyon and a massless vector. The Ramond sector has fermion zero modes, so even its oscillator ground state carries a spacetime spinor. The constraints turn these oscillator states into particles: transversality and a null-state quotient leave eight photon polarizations, while a Dirac equation leaves sixteen Ramond ground-state polarizations before a chirality projection.

We study a free string in flat ten-dimensional spacetime with Neumann conditions in every target direction and suppress Chan–Paton multiplicities. The shared worldsheet and fermion definitions and the plane versus oscillator ordering derived on the previous page apply throughout. We will derive the low-level physical spaces explicitly. The full spinor construction and the consistency of the GSO projection belong to the next two pages.

Endpoint gluing selects NS or Ramond modes

Section titled “Endpoint gluing selects NS or Ramond modes”

On the strip 0≤σ≤π0\leq\sigma\leq\pi, the fermion equations give one function of each null coordinate. Let the endpoint signs be s0,sπ∈{+1,−1}s_0,s_\pi\in\{+1,-1\}:

ψ+(τ,0)=s0ψ−(τ,0),ψ+(τ,π)=sπψ−(τ,π).\psi_+(\tau,0)=s_0\psi_-(\tau,0), \qquad \psi_+(\tau,\pi)=s_\pi\psi_-(\tau,\pi).

The same relations hold for allowed variations, so the endpoint expression ψ+⋅δψ+−ψ−⋅δψ−\psi_+\cdot\delta\psi_+-\psi_-\cdot\delta\psi_- vanishes separately at both boundaries. Write ψ+(τ,σ)=f(τ+σ)\psi_+(\tau,\sigma)=f(\tau+\sigma). The first endpoint determines the other component:

ψ−(τ,σ)=s0f(τ−σ).\psi_-(\tau,\sigma)=s_0 f(\tau-\sigma).

The second then requires f(τ+π)=sπs0f(τ−π)f(\tau+\pi)=s_\pi s_0 f(\tau-\pi). Thus the doubled field satisfies

f(u+2π)=s0sπf(u).f(u+2\pi)=s_0s_\pi f(u).

Equal endpoint signs give periodic, integer-moded Ramond fields; opposite signs give antiperiodic, half-integer-moded NS fields. Flipping the sign of ψ−\psi_- reverses both endpoint signs and leaves their product unchanged. There is therefore one independent chiral oscillator family, with two choices of spin structure. This argument, developed in Polchinski, Chaudhuri and Johnson, section 3.1, assumes the uniform NN endpoints specified above; mixed Neumann–Dirichlet directions change the moding.

The periodicity refers to the doubled strip or cylinder spin frame. On the plane, ψcyl=z1/2ψplane\psi_{\rm cyl}=z^{1/2}\psi_{\rm plane} reverses this sign after a circuit. In particular, a Ramond insertion produces a plane branch point. Doubling does not erase the distinction between the two spin structures.

Physical constraints relate oscillator levels to masses

Section titled “Physical constraints relate oscillator levels to masses”

A state is built with negative-index bosonic and fermionic oscillators. Positive-index modes annihilate the oscillator ground state. Ramond zero modes are different: they act within a degenerate ground-state space and do not increase the level. Let qμq^\mu denote the dimensionless eigenvalue of the open-string zero mode,

qμ=2α′ pμ.q^\mu=\sqrt{2\alpha'}\,p^\mu.

The level operator and the exact supercurrent modes are

N=∑n>0α−n⋅αn+∑r>0r ψ−r⋅ψr,Gr=∑n∈Zαn⋅ψr−n.\begin{aligned} N&=\sum_{n>0}\alpha_{-n}\cdot\alpha_n +\sum_{r>0}r\,\psi_{-r}\cdot\psi_r,\\ G_r&=\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}\alpha_n\cdot\psi_{r-n}. \end{aligned}

The fermion indices are half-integer in NS and integer in R. No extra nn is needed in the boson term: [αn,α−n]=n[\alpha_n,\alpha_{-n}]=n already makes α−n\alpha_{-n} raise NN by nn. The oscillator algebra gives two useful identities:

[Gr,αnμ]=−nψr+nμ,{Gr,ψsμ}=αr+sμ.[G_r,\alpha_n^\mu]=-n\psi_{r+n}^\mu, \qquad \{G_r,\psi_s^\mu\}=\alpha_{r+s}^\mu.

In old covariant quantization, the positive matter modes must annihilate a physical state:

Ln>0∣Φ⟩=0,Gr>0∣Φ⟩=0.L_{n>0}|\Phi\rangle=0, \qquad G_{r>0}|\Phi\rangle=0.

The zero-mode conditions require more care. Using plane matter generators at cm=15c_m=15, they are

NS:(L0−12)∣Φ⟩=0,R:(L0−58)∣Φ⟩=0,G0∣Φ⟩=0.\begin{aligned} \mathrm{NS}:&\quad (L_0-\tfrac12)|\Phi\rangle=0,\\ \mathrm{R}:&\quad (L_0-\tfrac58)|\Phi\rangle=0, \qquad G_0|\Phi\rangle=0. \end{aligned}

The R ground state has plane weight 5/85/8. The resulting zero modes are

L0NS=α′p2+NNS,L0R=α′p2+NR+58.L_0^{\rm NS}=\alpha'p^2+N_{\rm NS}, \qquad L_0^{\rm R}=\alpha'p^2+N_{\rm R}+\frac58.

Since p2=−M2p^2=-M^2, the physical conditions give

α′MNS2=NNS−12,α′MR2=NR.\alpha'M^2_{\rm NS}=N_{\rm NS}-\frac12, \qquad \alpha'M^2_{\rm R}=N_{\rm R}.

The physical oscillator intercepts are therefore aNS=1/2a_{\rm NS}=1/2 and aR=0a_{\rm R}=0. They are not the plane vacuum weights. In R, the plane superalgebra says

G02=L0−cm24=L0−58,G_0^2=L_0-\frac{c_m}{24}=L_0-\frac58,

so G0∣Φ⟩=0G_0|\Phi\rangle=0 implies the mass shell. Its square alone is weaker than the unsquared equation; we will see this explicitly for a null momentum.

These conditions select a subspace of an initially indefinite oscillator space. Physically null states, meaning states orthogonal to the entire constrained subspace, must also be identified. The critical theory admits an equivalent description with eight transverse bosons and eight transverse fermions. We use that equivalence when counting higher levels; the calculations below prove the particular low-level quotients, not an all-level BRST equivalence theorem. Weigand, sections 6.4.3 and 6.5, discusses the covariant and transverse descriptions. His oscillator-ordered L0L_0 must be distinguished from the plane generator used here.

The NS massless vector is a null-state quotient

Section titled “The NS massless vector is a null-state quotient”

The NS oscillator vacuum has N=0N=0 and hence M2=−1/(2α′)M^2=-1/(2\alpha'). It is a scalar tachyon of the unprojected theory. The next level is

∣ζ;p⟩=ζμψ−1/2μ∣0;p⟩NS,N=12,p2=0.|\zeta;p\rangle =\zeta_\mu\psi_{-1/2}^\mu|0;p\rangle_{\rm NS}, \qquad N=\frac12, \qquad p^2=0.

Apply the exact supercurrent mode. Every term except its zero-mode contraction vanishes:

G1/2∣ζ;p⟩=ζμα0μ∣0;p⟩=(q⋅ζ)∣0;p⟩.G_{1/2}|\zeta;p\rangle =\zeta_\mu\alpha_0^\mu|0;p\rangle =(q\cdot\zeta)|0;p\rangle.

Thus the polarization is transverse, p⋅ζ=0p\cdot\zeta=0. Higher positive modes lower the oscillator level below zero and give no additional conditions. For real nonzero null pp, this leaves a nine-dimensional space, rather than the eight physical photon polarizations. The remaining reduction is a quotient.

At the same null momentum, consider

∣χ;p⟩=G−1/2∣0;p⟩=q⋅ψ−1/2∣0;p⟩.|\chi;p\rangle=G_{-1/2}|0;p\rangle =q\cdot\psi_{-1/2}|0;p\rangle.

The precursor ∣0;p⟩|0;p\rangle has plane weight zero. It is not the on-shell tachyon state, whose plane weight must be 1/21/2. Its descendant has the required weight 1/21/2, and

G1/2∣χ;p⟩=2L0∣0;p⟩=q2∣0;p⟩=0.G_{1/2}|\chi;p\rangle =2L_0|0;p\rangle=q^2|0;p\rangle=0.

Its norm is q2=0q^2=0. More strongly, for any physical vector ∣ζ;p⟩|\zeta;p\rangle,

⟨ζ;p∣χ;p⟩=q⋅ζ∗=0.\langle\zeta;p|\chi;p\rangle =q\cdot\zeta^*=0.

This is why it can be removed: a zero-norm vector in an indefinite space need not be orthogonal to every physical state, but this one is. Adding it changes the polarization by a multiple of pp:

ζμ∼ζμ+λpμ,Hvector(p)=p⊥/span⁡(p).\zeta^\mu\sim\zeta^\mu+\lambda p^\mu, \qquad \mathcal H_{\rm vector}(p)=p^\perp/\operatorname{span}(p).

Choose a Lorentz frame pμ=(E,0,…,0,E)p^\mu=(E,0,\ldots,0,E), E≠0E\ne0. Transversality sets ζ9=ζ0\zeta^9=\zeta^0; the equivalence removes both together. The eight remaining components ζi\zeta^i, i=1,…,8i=1,\ldots,8, have norm ∑i∣ζi∣2\sum_i|\zeta^i|^2. They transform as the vector 8v8_v of the massless rotation little group. The translation part of the massless little group acts through the removed gauge direction.

Transversality leaves nine vector polarizations and quotienting the longitudinal radical leaves eight physical classes

At real nonzero null momentum in ten dimensions, the constrained polarization space has dimension nine and radical span⁡(p)\operatorname{span}(p) of dimension one. Representatives ζ\zeta and ζ+λp\zeta+\lambda p describe the same physical class. The resulting eight-dimensional space has positive norm. The drawing represents linear subspaces schematically; its lengths and angles do not depict a Euclidean geometry for the Lorentzian null hyperplane.

At p=0p=0, neither step has the same rank: transversality imposes no condition and G−1/2∣0;0⟩=0G_{-1/2}|0;0\rangle=0. The eight-polarization argument therefore has a nonzero-momentum hypothesis. This observation does not classify the exceptional zero-momentum BRST cohomology.

A massive NS level shows how the quotient works

Section titled “A massive NS level shows how the quotient works”

At N=1N=1, the mass is α′M2=1/2\alpha'M^2=1/2, so q2=−1q^2=-1. The complete covariant state includes both oscillator types:

∣Φ⟩=(Aμα−1μ+12Bμνψ−1/2μψ−1/2ν)∣0;p⟩,Bμν=−Bνμ.|\Phi\rangle= \left(A_\mu\alpha_{-1}^\mu +\frac12B_{\mu\nu}\psi_{-1/2}^\mu\psi_{-1/2}^\nu\right)|0;p\rangle, \qquad B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}.

There are 10+45=5510+45=55 coefficients. The graded identities give

G1/2∣Φ⟩=(Aν+qμBμν)ψ−1/2ν∣0;p⟩.G_{1/2}|\Phi\rangle =(A_\nu+q^\mu B_{\mu\nu})\psi_{-1/2}^\nu|0;p\rangle.

In particular, moving the odd generator past the first fermion produces a minus sign in the second contraction. Antisymmetry of BB then makes the two terms add. The constraint is

Aν+qμBμν=0.A_\nu+q^\mu B_{\mu\nu}=0.

It fixes AA in terms of BB and implies q⋅A=0q\cdot A=0. There are 45 constrained coefficients. The L1L_1 condition follows from G1/22=L1G_{1/2}^2=L_1; all larger positive modes vanish by level.

To find the radical, start from ∣ξ⟩=ξμψ−1/2μ∣0;p⟩|\xi\rangle=\xi_\mu\psi_{-1/2}^\mu|0;p\rangle with q⋅ξ=0q\cdot\xi=0. At this timelike momentum the precursor has plane weight q2/2+1/2=0q^2/2+1/2=0. Its descendant gives the shifts

δAμ=ξμ,δBμν=qμξν−qνξμ.\delta A_\mu=\xi_\mu, \qquad \delta B_{\mu\nu}=q_\mu\xi_\nu-q_\nu\xi_\mu.

They preserve the constraint because

δ(Aν+qμBμν)=(1+q2)ξν−qν(q⋅ξ)=0.\delta(A_\nu+q^\mu B_{\mu\nu}) =(1+q^2)\xi_\nu-q_\nu(q\cdot\xi)=0.

The descendant is orthogonal to every physical state by the same adjoint argument used for the photon. Its nine parameters are independent: its α−1\alpha_{-1} coefficient is ξμ\xi_\mu itself.

Now choose ξ=−A\xi=-A. This is allowed because q⋅A=0q\cdot A=0, and it yields a representative with

Aμ=0,qμBμν=0.A_\mu=0, \qquad q^\mu B_{\mu\nu}=0.

In the rest frame, B0ν=0B_{0\nu}=0. The state is an antisymmetric tensor on nine spatial directions, with

dim⁡HN=1=(92)=36,⟨Φ∣Φ⟩=12Bij∗Bij.\dim\mathcal H_{N=1}=\binom92=36, \qquad \langle\Phi|\Phi\rangle=\frac12B_{ij}^*B_{ij}.

This norm is positive unless the representative vanishes, so the nine descendants account for the full radical. The reduction is 55→45→3655\to45\to36. Exercise 4 supplies the explicit oscillator contractions and proves uniqueness of the representative.

In transverse quantization the same level consists of eight α−1i\alpha_{-1}^i states and (82)=28\binom82=28 two-fermion states. Their sum, 8+28=368+28=36, is the restriction of the SO(9) two-form to SO(8). Here the representation identification follows from the covariant construction, not just from a matching dimension.

At N=3/2N=3/2, the transverse states have three possible forms:

ψ−3/2i∣0;p⟩,α−1iψ−1/2j∣0;p⟩,ψ−1/2iψ−1/2jψ−1/2k∣0;p⟩.\psi_{-3/2}^i|0;p\rangle, \qquad \alpha_{-1}^i\psi_{-1/2}^j|0;p\rangle, \qquad \psi_{-1/2}^i\psi_{-1/2}^j\psi_{-1/2}^k|0;p\rangle.

They give 8+64+56=1288+64+56=128 polarizations at α′M2=1\alpha'M^2=1. The 6464 decomposes into a symmetric traceless tensor, an antisymmetric tensor and a scalar: 64=35+28+164=35+28+1. The massive SO(9) representations have the branchings

44⟶35+8+1,84⟶56+28.44\longrightarrow35+8+1, \qquad 84\longrightarrow56+28.

The 4444 is a symmetric traceless rank-two tensor in nine dimensions; the 8484 is a three-form. Splitting a spatial index into eight directions plus the ninth proves these branchings. Using critical Lorentz covariance, they identify the physical massive bosons as 44⊕8444\oplus84. This is a transverse representation analysis; we have not repeated the entire covariant constraint elimination at level 3/23/2.

The supersymmetric NS projection retains an odd number of fermion creation operators. It removes N=0N=0 and N=1N=1, while retaining N=1/2N=1/2 and N=3/2N=3/2. This is a choice of projection within the NS sector. It is not an operation converting an NS vector into a Ramond spinor.

Equally spaced NS mass-squared levels have physical counts one, eight, thirty-six and one hundred twenty-eight, with alternating retention under the supersymmetric projection

The first four unprojected NS levels have α′M2=−1/2,0,1/2,1\alpha'M^2=-1/2,0,1/2,1 and transverse polarization counts 1,8,36,1281,8,36,128. The mass-squared spacing is drawn quantitatively; horizontal positions are schematic. The supersymmetric NS parity retains the odd-fermion levels. The massive SO(9) representations are a two-form of dimension 36 and 44⊕8444\oplus84 of dimension 128. No massive rest-frame little group is assigned to the tachyon.

The R ground state is annihilated by positive oscillators, but its zero modes satisfy a Clifford algebra:

{ψ0μ,ψ0ν}=ημν,Γμ=2 ψ0μ.\{\psi_0^\mu,\psi_0^\nu\}=\eta^{\mu\nu}, \qquad \Gamma^\mu=\sqrt2\,\psi_0^\mu.

Thus the covariant ground states carry a 32-component Dirac index in ten dimensions. Write them as ∣u;p⟩=uA∣A;p⟩|u;p\rangle=u^A|A;p\rangle. Their level is zero, so the mass shell gives p2=0p^2=0.

In G0=∑nαn⋅ψ−nG_0=\sum_n\alpha_n\cdot\psi_{-n}, a term with n>0n>0 has an annihilating boson mode, which commutes through the fermion. A term with n<0n<0 has an annihilating fermion mode on the right. Only n=0n=0 remains. Consequently,

G0∣u;p⟩=q⋅ψ0∣u;p⟩=α′ pμΓμ∣u;p⟩.G_0|u;p\rangle =q\cdot\psi_0|u;p\rangle =\sqrt{\alpha'}\,p_\mu\Gamma^\mu|u;p\rangle.

Define p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/≡pμΓμp\!\!\!/\equiv p_\mu\Gamma^\mu. The physical zero-mode condition is precisely

p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/ u=0.p\!\!\!/\,u=0.

The coefficient is fixed by the open-string zero mode, and its square is α′p2\alpha'p^2. Although a nonzero rescaling would leave the equation’s kernel unchanged, it would fail to reproduce the correctly normalized superalgebra. At excited levels, the nonzero-mode terms of G0G_0 matter; exercise 6 exhibits their mixing explicitly.

Count the kernel before choosing chirality

Section titled “Count the kernel before choosing chirality”

Let pp be real, nonzero and null. Choose another null vector ℓ\ell satisfying p⋅ℓ=1p\cdot\ell=1. The Clifford relation gives

{p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/,ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/}=2,Pp=12p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/ ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/,Pℓ=12ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/ p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/.\{p\!\!\!/,\ell\!\!\!/\}=2, \qquad P_p=\frac12p\!\!\!/\,\ell\!\!\!/, \qquad P_\ell=\frac12\ell\!\!\!/\,p\!\!\!/.

These are complementary projectors. Moreover, p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/Pp=0p\!\!\!/P_p=0, and if p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/u=0p\!\!\!/u=0, then Ppu=uP_pu=u. Therefore the image of PpP_p is the Dirac kernel. Since tr⁡(ΓμΓν)=32ημν\operatorname{tr}(\Gamma^\mu\Gamma^\nu)=32\eta^{\mu\nu},

dim⁡ker⁡(p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)=tr⁡Pp=16.\dim\ker(p\!\!\!/)=\operatorname{tr}P_p=16.

The shared chirality operator Γ∗\Gamma_* anticommutes with each gamma matrix and commutes with PpP_p. A chosen chirality χ=±1\chi=\pm1 has projector Πχ=(1+χΓ∗)/2\Pi_\chi=(1+\chi\Gamma_*)/2. The trace of Γ∗Pp\Gamma_*P_p vanishes, so

dim⁡(ker⁡(p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)∩im⁡Πχ)=tr⁡(PpΠχ)=8.\dim\bigl(\ker(p\!\!\!/)\cap\operatorname{im}\Pi_\chi\bigr) =\operatorname{tr}(P_p\Pi_\chi)=8.

These are the dimensions of the complex polarization spaces at a fixed nonzero momentum. A Majorana condition relates Fourier coefficients of a real spacetime spinor field at opposite momenta; it is not another halving of the independent positive-energy polarization labels. The next page develops the Clifford construction, reality conditions and transverse spinor chiralities.

The exact Ramond ground-state constraint reduces thirty-two covariant spinor components to a sixteen-dimensional Dirac kernel and eight after a chirality projection

For a ground state at nonzero null momentum, G0=α′ p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/G_0=\sqrt{\alpha'}\,p\!\!\!/ on its spinor polarization. The Dirac constraint leaves 16 complex amplitudes; a single Weyl chirality leaves eight. The slash maps a complementary space UU isomorphically onto its kernel WW and vanishes on WW; the physical spinors remain in WW, with no quotient by the image. The chirality choice is a projection. The diagram is schematic and does not assign positive norm to the entire covariant 32-component space.

There is an instructive difference from the NS vector. Because (p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)2=0(p\!\!\!/)^2=0 and its rank is 16, one has ker⁡(p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)=im⁡(p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)\ker(p\!\!\!/)=\operatorname{im}(p\!\!\!/) as subspaces. Nevertheless, the physical spinor is the kernel itself. Quotienting by the image would remove every polarization. A spin-1/21/2 Dirac equation is an equation of motion, not a longitudinal gauge equivalence. Also, (p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)2u=0(p\!\!\!/)^2u=0 holds for every spinor at null momentum, whereas p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/u=0p\!\!\!/u=0 holds for only half of them.

Projection and spacetime supersymmetry are further steps

Section titled “Projection and spacetime supersymmetry are further steps”

Before projection the massless NS sector has eight polarizations, while the massless R sector has sixteen, and the NS vacuum is tachyonic. Worldsheet supersymmetry by itself does not make this a spacetime-supersymmetric particle spectrum. Nor do the physical particles simply form the superconformal modules from which the constraints were constructed: the positive supercurrent modes annihilate physical states, and some negative-mode descendants are removed as null.

The supersymmetric GSO choice keeps the massless NS vector, removes the NS tachyon and selects one Ramond chirality, yielding eight bosonic and eight fermionic polarizations. These are the on-shell field contents of a ten-dimensional N=1\mathcal N=1 vector multiplet. At higher R levels the projection also depends on nonzero-oscillator parity; it is not just the ground-state chirality rule applied unchanged. Polchinski, Chaudhuri and Johnson, section 3.1, explains this physical organization. The GSO page will develop the projection and its relation to spacetime supersymmetry. Matching counts is a useful check, but it does not by itself construct the supercharges or establish interaction consistency.

1. Test the endpoint signs with actual modes

Section titled “1. Test the endpoint signs with actual modes”

For arbitrary s0,sπ=±1s_0,s_\pi=\pm1, solve the free fermion equations and both endpoint conditions using a single mode f(u)=ve−iruf(u)=v e^{-iru}. Derive the allowed rr, verify cancellation of the variational boundary term, and explain why changing the sign of one chiral field leaves the sector unchanged. Give a mode which fails when the wrong frequency set is chosen.

Solution

The first boundary gives ψ+=ve−ir(τ+σ)\psi_+=v e^{-ir(\tau+\sigma)} and ψ−=s0ve−ir(τ−σ)\psi_-=s_0v e^{-ir(\tau-\sigma)}. The second requires

e−irπ=sπs0eirπ,e−2πir=s0sπ.e^{-ir\pi}=s_\pi s_0 e^{ir\pi}, \qquad e^{-2\pi ir}=s_0s_\pi.

Thus r∈Zr\in\mathbb Z for equal signs and r∈Z+1/2r\in\mathbb Z+1/2 for opposite signs. For a real Lorentzian solution, pair a mode with its conjugate; the frequency condition is unchanged.

At either endpoint bb, allowed variations obey δψ+=sbδψ−\delta\psi_+=s_b\delta\psi_-. Keeping the odd factors in their original order gives

ψ+⋅δψ+−ψ−⋅δψ−=(sb2−1)ψ−⋅δψ−=0.\psi_+\cdot\delta\psi_+-\psi_-\cdot\delta\psi_- =(s_b^2-1)\psi_-\cdot\delta\psi_-=0.

No commuting of the Grassmann fields is used. Redefining ψ−↦−ψ−\psi_-\mapsto-\psi_- reverses both s0s_0 and sπs_\pi and preserves their product.

For a concrete failure, choose s0=sπ=1s_0=s_\pi=1 but r=1/2r=1/2. At τ=0\tau=0, ψ+(π)=−iv\psi_+(\pi)=-iv whereas ψ−(π)=iv\psi_-(\pi)=iv, so the endpoint residual is −2iv-2iv. It satisfies the opposite-sign endpoint condition instead. A local equation of motion does not determine a sector until its global endpoint conditions are imposed.

2. Translate the Ramond zero-mode operators

Section titled “2. Translate the Ramond zero-mode operators”

At an arbitrary R oscillator level NN, compare plane L0L_0, oscillator-ordered L0oscL_0^{\rm osc} and the cylinder generator L0=L0−cm/24\mathcal L_0=L_0-c_m/24. Derive the open mass formula and the exact ground-state Dirac coefficient. Compare with one closed chirality at the same physical momentum, and test the incorrect prescription L0∣u;p⟩=0L_0|u;p\rangle=0 for a massless R ground state.

Solution

For ten matter multiplets, cm=15c_m=15 and the R plane vacuum weight is 5/85/8. Hence

L0osc=α′p2+N,L0=L0osc+58,L0=L0osc.L_0^{\rm osc}=\alpha'p^2+N, \qquad L_0=L_0^{\rm osc}+\frac58, \qquad \mathcal L_0=L_0^{\rm osc}.

The last equality is special to the R vacuum shift. Since G02=L0G_0^2=\mathcal L_0, its vanishing on a physical state implies α′p2+N=0\alpha'p^2+N=0, or α′M2=N\alpha'M^2=N. It does not make L0L_0 vanish: a physical R matter state has plane weight 5/85/8.

On the ground state the nonzero modes drop out, leaving

G0=2α′ p⋅ψ0=α′ p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/,G02=α′p2.G_0=\sqrt{2\alpha'}\,p\cdot\psi_0 =\sqrt{\alpha'}\,p\!\!\!/, \qquad G_0^2=\alpha'p^2.

For a noncompact closed chirality, α0=α′/2 p\alpha_0=\sqrt{\alpha'/2}\,p instead. Its ground-state operator is 12α′ p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/\tfrac12\sqrt{\alpha'}\,p\!\!\!/ and its square is α′p2/4\alpha'p^2/4. The common local ∂X\partial X OPE is unchanged; the physical momentum is related differently to a single chiral zero mode.

If one imposed plane L0=0L_0=0 at open R level zero, one would obtain α′p2=−5/8\alpha'p^2=-5/8. Then G02=−5/8G_0^2=-5/8 and no nonzero state could also obey G0=0G_0=0. The erroneous mass shell conflicts with the unsquared physical constraint. By contrast, the correct condition L0=5/8L_0=5/8 permits a nontrivial massless Dirac kernel.

3. Choose a photon representative without choosing a Lorentz frame

Section titled “3. Choose a photon representative without choosing a Lorentz frame”

Take real nonzero null pp and a null reference vector ℓ\ell with p⋅ℓ=1p\cdot\ell=1. Show that

Pμν=δμν−pμℓν−ℓμpνP^\mu{}_{\nu}=\delta^\mu{}_{\nu}-p^\mu\ell_\nu-\ell^\mu p_\nu

projects onto the eight-dimensional transverse space. For p⋅ζ=0p\cdot\zeta=0, compare PζP\zeta for two choices of ℓ\ell, prove equality of their norms, and explain exactly what fails at p=0p=0.

Solution

The null conditions and p⋅ℓ=1p\cdot\ell=1 give Pp=Pℓ=0Pp=P\ell=0, P2=PP^2=P, and tr⁡P=10−2=8\operatorname{tr}P=10-2=8. The map is self-adjoint in the target metric. The plane spanned by pp and ℓ\ell has one timelike and one spacelike direction, so its orthogonal complement is positive definite.

For a constrained polarization,

Pζ=ζ−p(ℓ⋅ζ).P\zeta=\zeta-p(\ell\cdot\zeta).

It differs from ζ\zeta by a gauge vector and obeys both p⋅Pζ=0p\cdot P\zeta=0 and ℓ⋅Pζ=0\ell\cdot P\zeta=0. If ℓ′\ell' is another admissible reference,

(Pℓ′−Pℓ)ζ=−p [(ℓ′−ℓ)⋅ζ].(P_{\ell'}-P_\ell)\zeta =-p\,[(\ell'-\ell)\cdot\zeta].

The two representatives therefore define the same class. For a complex polarization at real pp, the conditions p2=p⋅ζ=0p^2=p\cdot\zeta=0 also imply

(Pζ)∗⋅(Pζ)=ζ∗⋅ζ.(P\zeta)^*\cdot(P\zeta)=\zeta^*\cdot\zeta.

This norm is nonnegative on the constrained space and vanishes precisely for a longitudinal representative.

At p=0p=0 there is no vector satisfying p⋅ℓ=1p\cdot\ell=1. The constraint imposes no restriction, and the gauge vector λp\lambda p is zero. In particular, the elementary covariant state ψ−1/20∣0;0⟩\psi_{-1/2}^0|0;0\rangle satisfies these positive-mode conditions but has negative oscillator norm. This illustrates the failure of the nonzero-momentum reduction; it is not a substitute for the full zero-momentum cohomology analysis.

4. Complete the massive NS two-form reduction

Section titled “4. Complete the massive NS two-form reduction”

At N=1N=1 and q2=−1q^2=-1, derive the constraint on Aμ,BμνA_\mu,B_{\mu\nu} and the null descendant generated by ξ⋅ψ−1/2∣0;p⟩\xi\cdot\psi_{-1/2}|0;p\rangle, q⋅ξ=0q\cdot\xi=0. Show that every physical state has a unique representative with A=0A=0, calculate its norm, and compare the covariant and transverse counts. Determine the parity of this entire level under the supersymmetric NS choice.

Solution

The single-boson term gives G1/2A⋅α−1∣0;p⟩=A⋅ψ−1/2∣0;p⟩G_{1/2}A\cdot\alpha_{-1}|0;p\rangle=A\cdot\psi_{-1/2}|0;p\rangle. Call the two-fermion term ∣ΦB⟩|\Phi_B\rangle. It gives

G1/2∣ΦB⟩=12Bμν(qμψ−1/2ν−qνψ−1/2μ)∣0;p⟩=qμBμνψ−1/2ν∣0;p⟩.\begin{aligned} G_{1/2}|\Phi_B\rangle &=\frac12B_{\mu\nu}(q^\mu\psi_{-1/2}^\nu-q^\nu\psi_{-1/2}^\mu)|0;p\rangle\\ &=q^\mu B_{\mu\nu}\psi_{-1/2}^\nu|0;p\rangle. \end{aligned}

Thus Aν=−qμBμνA_\nu=-q^\mu B_{\mu\nu}. The coefficient of AA in these ten equations is the identity, so the constraint rank is ten. Contracting with qνq^\nu gives q⋅A=0q\cdot A=0.

For the descendant, move G−1/2G_{-1/2} past the single fermion before acting on the vacuum:

G−1/2ξ⋅ψ−1/2∣0;p⟩=[ξ⋅α−1−ξμψ−1/2μqνψ−1/2ν]∣0;p⟩.\begin{aligned} G_{-1/2}\xi\cdot\psi_{-1/2}|0;p\rangle =\left[\xi\cdot\alpha_{-1} -\xi_\mu\psi_{-1/2}^\mu q_\nu\psi_{-1/2}^\nu\right]|0;p\rangle. \end{aligned}

Reordering the last two fermions gives δB=q∧ξ\delta B=q\wedge\xi, with the positive sign stated in the text. The precursor obeys G1/2∣ξ⟩=0G_{1/2}|\xi\rangle=0 and has L0=0L_0=0, so its descendant is physical. For any physical ∣Φ⟩|\Phi\rangle,

⟨Φ∣G−1/2∣ξ⟩=⟨G1/2Φ∣ξ⟩=0.\langle\Phi|G_{-1/2}|\xi\rangle =\langle G_{1/2}\Phi|\xi\rangle=0.

These nine independent descendants are therefore in the radical. Setting ξ=−A\xi=-A gives A′=0A'=0 and qμBμν′=0q^\mu B'_{\mu\nu}=0. Any further such shift preserving A′=0A'=0 has ξ=0\xi=0, so the representative is unique within this family of identifications.

The oscillator contractions yield, before gauge fixing,

⟨Φ∣Φ⟩=Aμ∗Aμ+12Bμν∗Bμν.\langle\Phi|\Phi\rangle =A_\mu^*A^\mu+\frac12B_{\mu\nu}^*B^{\mu\nu}.

The mixed boson/fermion term vanishes. In a timelike rest frame with q0=1q^0=1, the constraint makes A0=0A_0=0 and Ai=−B0iA_i=-B_{0i}; the negative contribution of B0iB_{0i} cancels ∣Ai∣2|A_i|^2. Equivalently, in the representative A=0A=0, only spatial BijB_{ij} remain, with positive norm Bij∗Bij/2B_{ij}^*B_{ij}/2. There is no further radical after this reduction. Hence the physical dimension is 55−10−9=3655-10-9=36.

The SO(9) two-form splits under SO(8) into BijB_{ij} with 28 components and Bi9B_{i9} with eight, agreeing with the light-cone oscillator count. Both original oscillator types have even fermion occupation, zero or two. The supersymmetric NS projection keeps odd occupation, so it removes this whole unprojected level, not just one of its two oscillator descriptions.

Using the two null vectors p,ℓp,\ell, prove that Pp=12p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/P_p=\tfrac12p\!\!\!/\ell\!\!\!/ and Pℓ=12ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/P_\ell=\tfrac12\ell\!\!\!/p\!\!\!/ are complementary projectors. Count the Dirac and Weyl kernels and establish ker⁡(p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)=im⁡(p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)\ker(p\!\!\!/)=\operatorname{im}(p\!\!\!/). What happens at zero momentum or at p2≠0p^2\ne0? Why does the equality of kernel and image not remove the physical spinor?

Solution

Use (p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)2=(ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)2=0(p\!\!\!/)^2=(\ell\!\!\!/)^2=0 and p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/+ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/=2p\!\!\!/\ell\!\!\!/+\ell\!\!\!/p\!\!\!/=2. Then

Pp2=Pp,Pℓ2=Pℓ,PpPℓ=PℓPp=0,Pp+Pℓ=1.P_p^2=P_p, \qquad P_\ell^2=P_\ell, \qquad P_pP_\ell=P_\ell P_p=0, \qquad P_p+P_\ell=1.

The image of PpP_p is exactly the kernel, as shown in the text. Its trace is 32(p⋅ℓ)/2=1632(p\cdot\ell)/2=16. Furthermore, if p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/u=0p\!\!\!/u=0,

u=Ppu=p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/(12ℓ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/u),u=P_pu=p\!\!\!/\left(\frac12\ell\!\!\!/u\right),

so every kernel vector is in the image; the reverse inclusion follows from (p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/)2=0(p\!\!\!/)^2=0.

The even Clifford product PpP_p commutes with Γ∗\Gamma_*. The trace identities tr⁡Γ∗=0\operatorname{tr}\Gamma_*=0 and tr⁡(Γ∗ΓμΓν)=0\operatorname{tr}(\Gamma_*\Gamma^\mu\Gamma^\nu)=0 in ten dimensions imply

tr⁡(PpΠχ)=12tr⁡Pp=8.\operatorname{tr}(P_p\Pi_\chi)=\frac12\operatorname{tr}P_p=8.

For example, pμ=(E,0,…,0,E)p^\mu=(E,0,\ldots,0,E) gives p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/=E(−Γ0+Γ9)p\!\!\!/=E(-\Gamma^0+\Gamma^9). Multiplication by Γ0\Gamma^0 turns the equation into (1+Γ0Γ9)u=0(1+\Gamma^0\Gamma^9)u=0. The matrix Γ0Γ9\Gamma^0\Gamma^9 squares to one and has equal eigenspace dimensions; a Weyl condition halves each again.

At p=0p=0, the slash vanishes and its kernel is all 32 components, while its image is zero. At p2≠0p^2\ne0, it is invertible, with inverse (p2)−1p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/(p^2)^{-1}p\!\!\!/, so the massless Dirac equation has no nonzero solution.

Finally, no gauge transformation has been established on the spinor polarizations. The physical equation is p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/u=0p\!\!\!/u=0 itself. Replacing its solution space by kernel modulo image would give dimension zero at nonzero null pp and would contradict the explicit nonzero solutions above. In the vector problem, by contrast, the longitudinal states were proved to lie in the radical of the physical oscillator pairing.

6. See the oscillator mixing in an excited Ramond state

Section titled “6. See the oscillator mixing in an excited Ramond state”

At R level N=1N=1, let q2=−2q^2=-2 and K=q⋅ψ0K=q\cdot\psi_0. Consider

∣Φ⟩=α−1μ∣uμ;p⟩+ψ−1μ∣vμ;p⟩,|\Phi\rangle=\alpha_{-1}^\mu|u_\mu;p\rangle +\psi_{-1}^\mu|v_\mu;p\rangle,

where uμu_\mu and vμv_\mu are ground-state spinor polarizations and the nonzero creation modes stand to their left. Compute G0∣Φ⟩G_0|\Phi\rangle and solve its two oscillator coefficients. Then derive the additional G1G_1 equation. Explain why imposing only a ground-state Dirac equation on uμ,vμu_\mu,v_\mu would be wrong. No full massive R null-state quotient is requested.

Solution

On the ground-state spinors G0G_0 acts as KK, whose square is q2/2=−1q^2/2=-1. The relevant relations are

[G0,α−1μ]=ψ−1μ,{G0,ψ−1μ}=α−1μ.[G_0,\alpha_{-1}^\mu]=\psi_{-1}^\mu, \qquad \{G_0,\psi_{-1}^\mu\}=\alpha_{-1}^\mu.

The second relation is an anticommutator, so moving G0G_0 to the right of ψ−1\psi_{-1} reverses its sign. Therefore

G0∣Φ⟩=α−1μ∣Kuμ+vμ;p⟩+ψ−1μ∣uμ−Kvμ;p⟩.G_0|\Phi\rangle =\alpha_{-1}^\mu|Ku_\mu+v_\mu;p\rangle +\psi_{-1}^\mu|u_\mu-Kv_\mu;p\rangle.

The first coefficient gives vμ=−Kuμv_\mu=-Ku_\mu. The second then becomes (1+K2)uμ=0(1+K^2)u_\mu=0, which holds precisely at this mass shell. Thus the constraint mixes the two oscillator types.

For the positive mode, G1G_1 annihilates each ground-state spinor, while

[G1,α−1μ]=ψ0μ,{G1,ψ−1μ}=α0μ=qμ.[G_1,\alpha_{-1}^\mu]=\psi_0^\mu, \qquad \{G_1,\psi_{-1}^\mu\}=\alpha_0^\mu=q^\mu.

Consequently,

G1∣Φ⟩=∣ψ0μuμ+qμvμ;p⟩,G_1|\Phi\rangle =|\psi_0^\mu u_\mu+q^\mu v_\mu;p\rangle,

and substituting v=−Kuv=-Ku gives

ψ0μuμ−Kqμuμ=0.\psi_0^\mu u_\mu-Kq^\mu u_\mu=0.

This is an additional vector-spinor condition. Modes Gn≥2G_{n\geq2} vanish by level, and L1L_1 follows from {G0,G1}=2L1\{G_0,G_1\}=2L_1; these statements still do not perform the massive null-state quotient.

A ground-state-only rule Kuμ=Kvμ=0Ku_\mu=Kv_\mu=0 would kill every polarization, because K2=−1K^2=-1 makes KK invertible here. The full G0G_0 has nontrivial solutions because its nonzero oscillator terms cancel the zero-mode action. This is the string’s excited-state extension of the Dirac constraint.

  • Polchinski, Joseph, Shyamoli Chaudhuri, and Clifford V. Johnson. Notes on D-Branes. Institute for Theoretical Physics lectures, report NSF-ITP-96-003 (1996), section 3.1. arXiv:hep-th/9602052.
  • Weigand, Timo. Introduction to String Theory. Heidelberg University lecture notes, winter semester 2011/12, sections 6.3, 6.4.3 and 6.5. Lecture notes.