Skip to content

Tree-Level String Amplitudes from Worldsheet Correlators

A closed-string tree amplitude is a correlation function on a sphere, integrated over the inequivalent positions of its vertex operators. For four tachyons, this construction leaves one complex integral. Its three degeneration regions describe the three scattering channels of the same amplitude.

We work with the critical bosonic string in flat, noncompact spacetime. Its tachyon makes the perturbative vacuum unstable: the calculation below defines the familiar analytic bosonic-string amplitude, rather than scattering of stable particles in a tachyon-free vacuum. The simple tachyon vertex nevertheless exposes the geometry and normalization factors needed for more general external states.

Use the global conventions, the Gaussian correlators of page 10, and the sphere ghost functional of page 17. Page 18 supplies the moduli measure, and page 19 explains the physical BRST representatives. Here we apply that machinery; page 21 evaluates the resulting integral and studies its poles.

An external closed-string state can be represented by a local insertion at the end of its cylindrical worldsheet. Conformally shrinking that end gives a puncture on the sphere. The puncture is a marked point, not an open-string boundary.

For an even matter primary VV of weights (1,1)(1,1), the two useful representatives are

U(z,zˉ)=c(z)c~(zˉ)V(z,zˉ),∫d2z V(z,zˉ).U(z,\bar z)=c(z)\widetilde c(\bar z)V(z,\bar z), \qquad \int d^2z\,V(z,\bar z).

The first has total weights (0,0)(0,0) and ghost number two. The second contains the area element needed to integrate a position. Indeed, under z′=f(z)z'=f(z),

V′(z′,zˉ′)=∣f′(z)∣−2V(z,zˉ),d2z′=∣f′(z)∣2d2z.V'(z',\bar z')=|f'(z)|^{-2}V(z,\bar z), \qquad d^2z'=|f'(z)|^2d^2z.

Their product is invariant. Being primary matters: an operator with the right numerical weights but extra poles in its stress-tensor OPE need not satisfy the BRST constraints. Gauge-equivalent BRST representatives also describe the same physical state, subject to the usual treatment of boundaries of moduli space.

For n≥3n\ge3 distinct, labeled punctures on a sphere, the effective conformal automorphism group is PSL(2,C)\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb C). Its three complex parameters fix three positions. The other n−3n-3 complex positions are moduli. With fixed labels a,b,ca,b,c, the prescription has the form

An=Nngsn−2∫ ⁣∏j∉{a,b,c}d2zj ⟨UaUbUc∏j∉{a,b,c}Vj⟩S2.\mathcal A_n =\mathcal N_n g_s^{n-2} \int\!\prod_{j\notin\{a,b,c\}}d^2z_j\, \left\langle U_aU_bU_c \prod_{j\notin\{a,b,c\}}V_j\right\rangle_{S^2}.

The integration is over the configurations of the remaining distinct labeled points; collision limits require a convergence or continuation prescription. There is no additional integral over their positions after this moduli integral. Equivalently, one can begin with all vertices unintegrated and use the ordered antighost insertions associated with each moving puncture:

b~−1b−1(cc~V)=V.\widetilde b_{-1}b_{-1}\bigl(c\widetilde cV\bigr)=V.

This is the local descent discussed on page 18. Applying it and then integrating the same position a second time would double count that modulus. Amplitudes with fewer than three insertions require separate treatment of their conformal stabilizers.

The power of gsg_s also has two ingredients. A filled genus-zero surface contributes gs−2g_s^{-2} from its Euler characteristic. A canonically normalized external closed-string insertion contributes one gsg_s, giving gsn−2g_s^{n-2}. The constants Nn\mathcal N_n retain external-state normalization, the sphere functional normalization and a possible overall phase; we do not determine the absolute S-matrix normalization here. This construction is described in Polchinski, sections 2.7–2.8, and the explicit tachyon calculation in Tong, section 6.2.

Tachyon correlators and the Koba–Nielsen factor

Section titled “Tachyon correlators and the Koba–Nielsen factor”

The matter tachyon vertex is

Vk(z,zˉ)=:eik⋅X(z,zˉ):,hk=hˉk=α′k24.V_k(z,\bar z)=:e^{ik\cdot X(z,\bar z)}:, \qquad h_k=\bar h_k=\frac{\alpha'k^2}{4}.

Consequently its physical-state condition and mass are

k2=4α′,mT2=−k2=−4α′.k^2=\frac4{\alpha'}, \qquad m_T^2=-k^2=-\frac4{\alpha'}.

All momenta in the correlator are incoming. An outgoing spacetime particle therefore appears with the negative of its outgoing momentum.

The target zero mode enforces momentum conservation

Section titled “The target zero mode enforces momentum conservation”

Separate the constant target coordinate from the nonzero modes, Xμ=x0μ+X′μX^\mu=x_0^\mu+X'^\mu. The action is independent of x0x_0, and its integral gives

∫dDx0 eix0⋅∑iki=(2π)Dδ(D) ⁣(∑iki),D=26.\int d^Dx_0\,e^{ix_0\cdot\sum_i k_i} =(2\pi)^D\delta^{(D)}\!\left(\sum_i k_i\right), \qquad D=26.

This factor is not obtained by inverting the kinetic operator: that operator annihilates the constant mode. Normalize the Gaussian nonzero-mode functional as on page 10 and keep the zero-mode integral explicitly. Likewise, the ghost functional is saturated by insertions; it is not divided by its vanishing, unsaturated sphere partition function.

For the nonzero modes, write the component contraction as

⟨X′μ(zi)X′ν(zj)⟩=ημνG(zi,zj),G(zi,zj)=−α′2log⁡∣zi−zj∣2.\langle X'^\mu(z_i)X'^\nu(z_j)\rangle =\eta^{\mu\nu}G(z_i,z_j), \qquad G(z_i,z_j)=-\frac{\alpha'}2\log|z_i-z_j|^2.

The scalar kernel GG is distinct from the target trace ⟨Xi′⋅Xj′⟩=DG\langle X'_i\cdot X'_j\rangle=DG. Contracting the momenta first gives kiμkjνημνG=ki⋅kj Gk_{i\mu}k_{j\nu}\eta^{\mu\nu}G=k_i\cdot k_j\,G, with no extra factor of DD.

For a Gaussian field, exponentiation sums every contraction between different normal-ordered vertices. The two factors of ii supply a minus sign:

⟨∏i:eiki⋅Xi′:⟩=exp⁡ ⁣[−∑i<jki⋅kj G(zi,zj)]=∏i<j∣zij∣α′ki⋅kj,\left\langle\prod_i:e^{ik_i\cdot X'_i}:\right\rangle =\exp\!\left[-\sum_{i<j}k_i\cdot k_j\,G(z_i,z_j)\right] =\prod_{i<j}|z_{ij}|^{\alpha'k_i\cdot k_j},

where zij=zi−zjz_{ij}=z_i-z_j. There is one term for each unordered pair; self-contractions have already been subtracted by normal ordering. Define this last product as Kn\mathcal K_n. Then

⟨∏iVki(zi,zˉi)⟩=(2π)Dδ(D) ⁣(∑iki)Kn,Kn=∏i<j∣zij∣α′ki⋅kj.\left\langle\prod_iV_{k_i}(z_i,\bar z_i)\right\rangle =(2\pi)^D\delta^{(D)}\!\left(\sum_i k_i\right)\mathcal K_n, \qquad \mathcal K_n=\prod_{i<j}|z_{ij}|^{\alpha'k_i\cdot k_j}.

This is the Koba–Nielsen factor. The formula uses the plane coordinate and its local normal ordering on the punctured sphere. A correlator expressed in a round-sphere metric includes the corresponding primary and Weyl factors; it is not obtained by treating every VkV_k as a coordinate-independent scalar.

We write An=(2π)Dδ(D)(∑iki)A^n\mathcal A_n=(2\pi)^D\delta^{(D)}(\sum_i k_i)\widehat{\mathcal A}_n and call A^n\widehat{\mathcal A}_n the momentum-delta-stripped amplitude. The analytic continuation below acts on this stripped quantity, rather than on a delta function of complex momenta.

The infinitesimal motion of three marked positions under the sphere conformal Killing vectors is a linear combination of 1,z,z21,z,z^2. Thus the change from group parameters to these positions has the determinant

Jabc=det⁡(1zaza21zbzb21zczc2).J_{abc}=\det\begin{pmatrix} 1&z_a&z_a^2\\ 1&z_b&z_b^2\\ 1&z_c&z_c^2 \end{pmatrix}.

Its absolute square is

∣Jabc∣2=∣zabzaczbc∣2.|J_{abc}|^2=|z_{ab}z_{ac}z_{bc}|^2.

The ordered chiral ghost functional produces the same magnitude, with its sign fixed by the order of the three odd insertions:

⟨c(za)c(zb)c(zc)⟩=zabzaczbc.\langle c(z_a)c(z_b)c(z_c)\rangle =z_{ab}z_{ac}z_{bc}.

The grouped product of this expression and its antiholomorphic counterpart is ∣zabzaczbc∣2|z_{ab}z_{ac}z_{bc}|^2. Moving three interleaved cc~c\widetilde c pairs into that grouped order takes three odd transpositions and gives a minus sign. We absorb this single, position-independent sign into the overall amplitude constant when passing from the earlier UaUbUcU_aU_bU_c prescription to the positive determinant below. No relative sign may be discarded inside a chiral calculation.

Accordingly, with a consistently normalized constant CnC_n,

A^n=Cngsn−2∫ ⁣∏j∉{a,b,c}d2zj ∣zabzaczbc∣2Kn.\widehat{\mathcal A}_n =C_n g_s^{n-2} \int\!\prod_{j\notin\{a,b,c\}}d^2z_j\, |z_{ab}z_{ac}z_{bc}|^2\mathcal K_n.

For f(z)=(Az+B)/(Cz+D)f(z)=(Az+B)/(Cz+D) with determinant Δ=AD−BC≠0\Delta=AD-BC\ne0,

f(zi)−f(zj)=Δzij(Czi+D)(Czj+D),f′(z)=Δ(Cz+D)2.f(z_i)-f(z_j)=\frac{\Delta z_{ij}}{(Cz_i+D)(Cz_j+D)}, \qquad f'(z)=\frac{\Delta}{(Cz+D)^2}.

It follows that ∣f(zi)−f(zj)∣=∣zij∣ ∣f′(zi)f′(zj)∣1/2|f(z_i)-f(z_j)|=|z_{ij}|\,|f'(z_i)f'(z_j)|^{1/2}. Using momentum conservation,

Kn(f(zi))Kn(zi)=∏i∣f′(zi)∣α′2∑j≠iki⋅kj=∏i∣f′(zi)∣−α′ki2/2.\frac{\mathcal K_n(f(z_i))}{\mathcal K_n(z_i)} =\prod_i|f'(z_i)|^{\frac{\alpha'}2\sum_{j\ne i}k_i\cdot k_j} =\prod_i|f'(z_i)|^{-\alpha'k_i^2/2}.

On shell this is ∏i∣f′(zi)∣−2\prod_i|f'(z_i)|^{-2}. Each moving vertex has an area Jacobian ∣f′∣2|f'|^2, and the fixed-position determinant has precisely the product of those same factors at the three fixed points. The complete density is therefore invariant. This checks the gauge fixing directly, including its Jacobian.

For four labels choose the map

f(w)=(w−z1)(z4−z3)(w−z3)(z4−z1).f(w)=\frac{(w-z_1)(z_4-z_3)}{(w-z_3)(z_4-z_1)}.

It sends labels 1,4,31,4,3 to 0,1,∞0,1,\infty. The remaining position is

x=f(z2)=(z2−z1)(z4−z3)(z2−z3)(z4−z1).x=f(z_2)=\frac{(z_2-z_1)(z_4-z_3)}{(z_2-z_3)(z_4-z_1)}.

We subsequently call this coordinate zz, so the fixed configuration is

(z1,z2,z3,z4)=(0,z,∞,1).(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)=(0,z,\infty,1).

Other cross-ratios describe the same moduli space, but their relation to zz must be calculated. For example, z12z34/(z13z24)z_{12}z_{34}/(z_{13}z_{24}) becomes z/(z−1)z/(z-1) in this configuration, not zz.

An explicit complex Möbius map fixes labels one, four and three at zero, one and infinity while label two becomes two plus i.

For (z1,z2,z3,z4)=(0,1+i,2i,1)(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)=(0,1+i,2i,1), the map is f(w)=(1−2i)w/(w−2i)f(w)=(1-2i)w/(w-2i) and x=f(z2)=2+ix=f(z_2)=2+i. Both finite-coordinate plots use equal real and imaginary scales; infinity denotes the sphere point omitted from the finite-coordinate plot. Worldsheet coordinates are dimensionless. The map’s pole is not a boundary of the surface.

Three tachyons and the insertion at infinity

Section titled “Three tachyons and the insertion at infinity”

The three-point amplitude provides a first test of the prescription. For three on-shell tachyons with k1+k2+k3=0k_1+k_2+k_3=0,

2k1⋅k2=k32−k12−k22=−4α′,2k_1\cdot k_2=k_3^2-k_1^2-k_2^2=-\frac4{\alpha'},

and similarly for the other pairs. Hence

K3=∣z12z13z23∣−2,A^3=C3gs.\mathcal K_3=|z_{12}z_{13}z_{23}|^{-2}, \qquad \widehat{\mathcal A}_3=C_3g_s.

The ghost determinant cancels all coordinate dependence. There is no modulus to integrate. This is a constant three-tachyon coupling in the chosen external-state normalization, not a determination of C3C_3.

For four points, take the third position to a finite value RR first:

(z1,z2,z3,z4)=(0,z,R,1).(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)=(0,z,R,1).

The factors in K4\mathcal K_4 involving RR behave as

∏j≠3∣R−zj∣α′k3⋅kj=∣R∣α′k3⋅∑j≠3kj [1+O(∣R∣−1)]=∣R∣−4[1+O(∣R∣−1)].\prod_{j\ne3}|R-z_j|^{\alpha'k_3\cdot k_j} =|R|^{\alpha'k_3\cdot\sum_{j\ne3}k_j}\,[1+O(|R|^{-1})] =|R|^{-4}[1+O(|R|^{-1})].

Here the other coordinates and momenta are fixed as ∣R∣→∞|R|\to\infty. The grouped ghost determinant at the fixed points 0,R,10,R,1 is ∣R(R−1)∣2|R(R-1)|^2, which grows as ∣R∣4|R|^4. Their product has a finite limit.

The chiral ordering is visible before taking the absolute square:

⟨c(0)c(R)c(1)⟩=R(R−1),⟨c(0)c(∞)c(1)⟩=1,\langle c(0)c(R)c(1)\rangle=R(R-1), \qquad \langle c(0)c(\infty)c(1)\rangle=1,

where c(∞)=lim⁡R→∞R−2c(R)c(\infty)=\lim_{R\to\infty}R^{-2}c(R). Interchanging the last two odd fields gives ⟨c(0)c(1)c(∞)⟩=−1\langle c(0)c(1)c(\infty)\rangle=-1.

One can instead define the matter insertion V(∞)=lim⁡R→∞∣R∣4V(R,Rˉ)V(\infty)=\lim_{R\to\infty}|R|^4V(R,\bar R) and the two ghost insertions at infinity separately. Their rescaling factors cancel. These are two descriptions of the same limit: after using the finite-RR product, do not attach another factor of ∣R∣4|R|^4.

At large finite R the tachyon matter factor falls as the fourth inverse power while the fixed ghost determinant grows as the fourth power.

Momentum conservation and k32=4/α′k_3^2=4/\alpha' give the matter scaling ∣R∣−4|R|^{-4}. The ordered fixed ghosts at (0,R,1)(0,R,1) give R(R−1)R(R-1) in one chirality and ∣R(R−1)∣2|R(R-1)|^2 in the grouped closed-string functional. The cancellation is an asymptotic statement with other punctures fixed; the separately rescaled infinity operators give the same finite result.

After the finite-RR cancellation, the only nonconstant finite separations are ∣z∣|z| and ∣1−z∣|1-z|. Thus

A^4=C4gs2∫Cd2z ∣z∣α′k1⋅k2∣1−z∣α′k2⋅k4.\widehat{\mathcal A}_4 =C_4g_s^2\int_{\mathbb C}d^2z\, |z|^{\alpha'k_1\cdot k_2}|1-z|^{\alpha'k_2\cdot k_4}.

The points 0,1,∞0,1,\infty are excluded from the space of distinct configurations; the notation denotes the corresponding improper integral. There is no open-string cyclic ordering restriction: the moving closed-string puncture explores the entire complex moduli plane.

Define the invariants by the pairs that occur in this coordinate choice:

s=−(k1+k2)2,t=−(k2+k4)2,u=−(k1+k4)2=−(k2+k3)2.s=-(k_1+k_2)^2, \qquad t=-(k_2+k_4)^2, \qquad u=-(k_1+k_4)^2=-(k_2+k_3)^2.

Since ki2=4/α′k_i^2=4/\alpha',

α′k1⋅k2=−α′s2−4,α′k2⋅k4=−α′t2−4,s+t+u=−16α′.\alpha'k_1\cdot k_2=-\frac{\alpha's}{2}-4, \qquad \alpha'k_2\cdot k_4=-\frac{\alpha't}{2}-4, \qquad s+t+u=-\frac{16}{\alpha'}.

For the last identity, replace the pair defining tt by k1+k3k_1+k_3 using momentum conservation, expand the three squares and use k2+k3+k4=−k1k_2+k_3+k_4=-k_1. The sum becomes −∑iki2-\sum_i k_i^2.

Our final integral is therefore

A^4(s,t,u)=C4gs2∫Cd2z ∣z∣−α′s/2−4∣1−z∣−α′t/2−4.\widehat{\mathcal A}_4(s,t,u) =C_4g_s^2\int_{\mathbb C}d^2z\, |z|^{-\alpha's/2-4}|1-z|^{-\alpha't/2-4}.

All exponents are dimensionless: s,t,us,t,u have dimensions of inverse length squared, and α′\alpha' has dimensions of length squared. Worldsheet coordinate Jacobians cannot be replaced by dimensional powers of target-space momentum.

Introduce parameters for the three neighborhoods,

a=−1−α′s4,b=−1−α′t4,d=1−a−b=−1−α′u4.a=-1-\frac{\alpha's}{4}, \qquad b=-1-\frac{\alpha't}{4}, \qquad d=1-a-b=-1-\frac{\alpha'u}{4}.

We use dd here to avoid confusing a parameter with the ghost field cc. The integrand is ∣z∣2a−2∣1−z∣2b−2|z|^{2a-2}|1-z|^{2b-2}. For complex a,ba,b, these powers mean exponentials of the real logarithms of the positive moduli.

Near z=0z=0, the absolute value of the integrand behaves as r2Re⁡a−2r^{2\operatorname{Re}a-2}. The radial measure supplied by the overview is d2z=2r dr dθd^2z=2r\,dr\,d\theta, so integrability requires Re⁡a>0\operatorname{Re}a>0. Near 11 it requires Re⁡b>0\operatorname{Re}b>0. At large rr, the radial integrand behaves as r2Re⁡(a+b)−3r^{2\operatorname{Re}(a+b)-3}, requiring Re⁡(a+b)<1\operatorname{Re}(a+b)<1. Equivalently,

Re⁡a>0,Re⁡b>0,Re⁡d>0,\operatorname{Re}a>0,\qquad \operatorname{Re}b>0,\qquad \operatorname{Re}d>0,

or

Re⁡s<−4α′,Re⁡t<−4α′,Re⁡u<−4α′.\operatorname{Re}s<-\frac4{\alpha'},\qquad \operatorname{Re}t<-\frac4{\alpha'},\qquad \operatorname{Re}u<-\frac4{\alpha'}.

This domain is nonempty: a=b=d=1/3a=b=d=1/3 gives s=t=u=−16/(3α′)s=t=u=-16/(3\alpha'). There the integral is absolutely convergent and the changes of variable used below are justified. Outside it, the amplitude is defined by analytic continuation from that domain. In particular, inserting physical real scattering invariants into a divergent integrand is not an alternative evaluation prescription. Page 21 obtains the meromorphic continuation through the complex beta integral.

When z→0z\to0, punctures 11 and 22 approach each other and their combined momentum is the ss-channel momentum. When z→1z\to1, the pair is 2,42,4, giving tt. The limit z→∞z\to\infty is an ordinary collision in the reciprocal coordinate ζ=1/z\zeta=1/z: label 22 approaches label 33, giving uu.

The neighborhoods of zero, one and infinity in the complex modulus correspond to collisions of pairs twelve, twenty-four and twenty-three.

For (z1,z2,z3,z4)=(0,z,∞,1)(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)=(0,z,\infty,1), the three collision regions carry ss, tt and uu, respectively. The infinity neighborhood is shown in a reciprocal coordinate. The displayed coordinate radius is ϵ=1/5\epsilon=1/5, so the inverse-chart disk corresponds to ∣z∣>5|z|>5. These illustrative regions are not extra disjoint amplitudes or a choice of physical cutoff. All three belong to the single four-punctured-sphere integral.

A collision can be described by a long intermediate tube and expanded in exchanged string states. We defer the pole spectrum and its factorization to page 21. At this stage the geometric conclusion is already clear: adding three copies of the full moduli integral, one for each named channel, would overcount the amplitude. Crossing is implemented by relabeling punctures and changing the modulus coordinate.

Dropping a ghost sign because the full determinant is positive. An absolute square hides the difference between two chiral orderings. Keep the odd-field order through a calculation, and absorb only a single explicitly identified overall sign into the chosen amplitude normalization.

Treating infinity as a divergent insertion. Infinity is a regular point in another sphere chart. Work at finite RR and take the combined matter–ghost limit, or use the separately rescaled operators, but not both.

Using on-shell conformal weights to justify an off-shell amplitude. The usual integrated prescription is invariant only with the appropriate weights and BRST conditions. Off-shell string amplitudes require additional choices, such as local coordinates in a string-field-theory construction.

Exercise 1. An off-shell test of the sphere prescription

Section titled “Exercise 1. An off-shell test of the sphere prescription”

For neutral momenta ∑iki=0\sum_i k_i=0 with arbitrary ki2k_i^2, transform the formal all-integrated density ∏id2zi Kn\prod_i d^2z_i\,\mathcal K_n under a Möbius map. Identify its uncanceled factors. As a numerical scaling example, take two momenta k,−kk,-k with α′k2=2\alpha'k^2=2 and f(z)=2zf(z)=2z. Does dividing by a formal group volume put these insertions on shell?

Solution

The finite-distance identity gives

∏id2f(zi) Kn(f(zi))=∏i∣f′(zi)∣2−α′ki2/2∏id2zi Kn(zi).\prod_i d^2f(z_i)\,\mathcal K_n(f(z_i)) =\prod_i|f'(z_i)|^{2-\alpha'k_i^2/2} \prod_i d^2z_i\,\mathcal K_n(z_i).

The factors cancel locally for ordinary tachyon insertions precisely when α′ki2=4\alpha'k_i^2=4. In the example, each exponent is 11, so the density changes by 2×2=42\times2=4. Directly, the two area measures contribute 242^4, while K2=∣z12∣−2\mathcal K_2=|z_{12}|^{-2} contributes 2−22^{-2}, again leaving 44.

The two-point example diagnoses local covariance; it is not a valid application of the stable n≥3n\ge3 sphere fixing recipe. A formal division by the group volume does not remove an insertion-dependent Jacobian. More generally, satisfying a scaling identity does not prove BRST closure for an arbitrary nonprimary vertex. Off-shell constructions require extra geometric data and cannot be obtained by simply ignoring the physical-state conditions in this formula.

Exercise 2. Changing which puncture is at infinity

Section titled “Exercise 2. Changing which puncture is at infinity”

Start from the noncollinear configuration in the first figure. In the normalized coordinate its points are (0,z,∞,1)(0,z,\infty,1) with z=2+iz=2+i. Now send labels 1,3,41,3,4 to 0,1,∞0,1,\infty by y=z/(z−1)y=z/(z-1). Compute the new movable coordinate and the real area Jacobian there. Transform the full four-point density and identify which exponents are exchanged.

Solution

At the specified point,

y=2+i1+i=3−i2,dydz=−1(z−1)2,∣dydz∣2=14.y=\frac{2+i}{1+i}=\frac{3-i}{2}, \qquad \frac{dy}{dz}=-\frac1{(z-1)^2}, \qquad \left|\frac{dy}{dz}\right|^2=\frac14.

The first normalization map has f′(1+i)=1−2if'(1+i)=1-2i, so its real area Jacobian is 55. The composite map from the original plane to yy has Jacobian 5/45/4 at the movable puncture. This uses the determinant of a real two-dimensional map, not its complex derivative without an absolute square.

Put A=−α′s/2−4A=-\alpha's/2-4 and B=−α′t/2−4B=-\alpha't/2-4. Since z=y/(y−1)z=y/(y-1),

d2z ∣z∣A∣1−z∣B=d2y ∣y∣A∣1−y∣−A−B−4=d2y ∣y∣−α′s/2−4∣1−y∣−α′u/2−4.d^2z\,|z|^A|1-z|^B =d^2y\,|y|^A|1-y|^{-A-B-4} =d^2y\,|y|^{-\alpha's/2-4}|1-y|^{-\alpha'u/2-4}.

The last equality uses s+t+u=−16/α′s+t+u=-16/\alpha'. The tt and uu regions have exchanged roles. Label 22 now approaches label 33 at y=1y=1 and label 44 at infinity.

With the fixed label order (1,3,4)(1,3,4), the chiral determinant in the new coordinate is ⟨c(0)c(1)c(∞)⟩=−1\langle c(0)c(1)c(\infty)\rangle=-1, whereas the old one was +1+1. The antiholomorphic factor changes sign as well, so the grouped closed determinant remains +1+1. This accounts for the ghost order independently of the area Jacobian. The two expressions represent exactly the same integration density.

Exercise 3. Infinity factors away from the tachyon shell

Section titled “Exercise 3. Infinity factors away from the tachyon shell”

Keep momentum conservation, but let the scalar exponential at the third puncture have arbitrary equal weights h=hˉ=α′k32/4h=\bar h=\alpha'k_3^2/4. Determine the large-RR behavior of the unrescaled product of that matter insertion with the three-fixed-point ghost determinant. Derive the rescaling needed for its ghost-dressed operator. Then check the on-shell three-tachyon amplitude when every matter vertex is multiplied by a constant λ\lambda.

Solution

The factors joining the third puncture to all others give

∏j≠3∣R−zj∣α′k3⋅kj∼∣R∣−α′k32=∣R∣−4h.\prod_{j\ne3}|R-z_j|^{\alpha'k_3\cdot k_j} \sim|R|^{-\alpha'k_3^2}=|R|^{-4h}.

The grouped ghost determinant contributes ∣R∣4|R|^4. Their product therefore scales as ∣R∣4−4h|R|^{4-4h}. The combined primary U=cc~VU=c\widetilde cV has weights (h−1,h−1)(h-1,h-1), so its infinity definition requires the reciprocal factor:

U(∞)=lim⁡R→∞∣R∣4(h−1)U(R,Rˉ).U(\infty)=\lim_{R\to\infty}|R|^{4(h-1)}U(R,\bar R).

This is the same factor obtained by multiplying the matter rescaling ∣R∣4h|R|^{4h} by the ghost rescaling ∣R∣−4|R|^{-4}. For an ordinary physical tachyon h=1h=1, no net rescaling of UU remains. Away from the shell, defining this local infinity operator does not repair the failure of the integrated amplitude to be coordinate invariant.

For the three on-shell tachyons, conservation gives α′ki⋅kj=−2\alpha'k_i\cdot k_j=-2 for all three pairs. The product λ3K3\lambda^3\mathcal K_3 is canceled in position dependence by the ghost determinant, leaving

A^3=λ3C3gs.\widehat{\mathcal A}_3=\lambda^3 C_3g_s.

Thus the cancellation checks coordinate independence, while the numerical coupling still depends on the normalization of the external fields. It cannot determine an absolute three-point normalization by itself.

Exercise 4. Real center-of-mass kinematics

Section titled “Exercise 4. Real center-of-mass kinematics”

Consider the following all-incoming momenta, with the unused spatial components zero:

k1=(E,p,0),k2=(E,−p,0),k3=(−E,−pcos⁡θ,−psin⁡θ),k4=(−E,pcos⁡θ,psin⁡θ).\begin{aligned} k_1&=(E,p,0),& k_2&=(E,-p,0),\\ k_3&=(-E,-p\cos\theta,-p\sin\theta),& k_4&=(-E,p\cos\theta,p\sin\theta). \end{aligned}

Find EE, ss, tt and uu on the tachyon shell. For α′=1\alpha'=1, p=3p=3 and cos⁡θ=1/3\cos\theta=1/3, determine whether the original integral converges. Explain the role of this real kinematic example despite the vacuum instability.

Solution

The four vectors sum to zero and each has norm −E2+p2-E^2+p^2. The shell condition gives

E2=p2−4α′.E^2=p^2-\frac4{\alpha'}.

A real positive energy requires p2>4/α′p^2>4/\alpha'. Squaring the appropriate pair sums gives

s=4E2,t=−2p2(1−cos⁡θ),u=−2p2(1+cos⁡θ).s=4E^2,\qquad t=-2p^2(1-\cos\theta),\qquad u=-2p^2(1+\cos\theta).

Their sum is 4(E2−p2)=−16/α′4(E^2-p^2)=-16/\alpha'. For the numerical choice,

E=5,(s,t,u)=(20,−12,−24),(a,b,d)=(−6,2,5).E=\sqrt5,\qquad(s,t,u)=(20,-12,-24),\qquad(a,b,d)=(-6,2,5).

The integrand is ∣z∣−14∣1−z∣2|z|^{-14}|1-z|^2, which is not integrable near zero. The analytic amplitude must instead be obtained by continuation from the convergence domain. This exercise determines the kinematics and the failure of the original integral; evaluating the continued expression or its limit at special invariants requires the pole and zero analysis on page 21. Nearby generic real choices also remain outside the original convergence domain.

These vectors are an exact check of the signature, momentum labels and invariant identities. They do not establish a stable tachyon scattering experiment: the background about which this perturbation theory is organized is unstable.

Exercise 5. Cutoffs and logarithms at degeneration thresholds

Section titled “Exercise 5. Cutoffs and logarithms at degeneration thresholds”

For real a,b,d=1−a−ba,b,d=1-a-b, compute the leading radial contribution from ϵ<∣z∣<r0≪1\epsilon<|z|<r_0\ll1, and similarly near z=1z=1. At infinity use R0<∣z∣<ΛR_0<|z|<\Lambda with R0≫1R_0\gg1. Determine the cutoff dependence both away from and at each convergence threshold. Do not evaluate the full complex beta integral.

Solution

Near zero, the factor ∣1−z∣2b−2|1-z|^{2b-2} tends to one. Its leading local model gives

4π∫ϵr0r2a−1 dr={2πa(r02a−ϵ2a),a≠0,4πlog⁡(r0/ϵ),a=0.4\pi\int_\epsilon^{r_0}r^{2a-1}\,dr =\begin{cases} \displaystyle\frac{2\pi}{a}(r_0^{2a}-\epsilon^{2a}),&a\ne0,\\[4pt] 4\pi\log(r_0/\epsilon),&a=0. \end{cases}

For a>0a>0, the omitted disk contributes 2πϵ2a/a2\pi\epsilon^{2a}/a to leading order and vanishes as ϵ→0\epsilon\to0. For a<0a<0, the retained annulus diverges as −2πϵ2a/a-2\pi\epsilon^{2a}/a. At a=0a=0 the divergence is logarithmic. Corrections from the smooth second factor do not change this leading integrability condition. The same calculation at 11 replaces aa by bb.

At large radius the leading model is

4π∫R0Λr−2d−1 dr={2πd(R0−2d−Λ−2d),d≠0,4πlog⁡(Λ/R0),d=0.4\pi\int_{R_0}^{\Lambda}r^{-2d-1}\,dr =\begin{cases} \displaystyle\frac{2\pi}{d}(R_0^{-2d}-\Lambda^{-2d}),&d\ne0,\\[4pt] 4\pi\log(\Lambda/R_0),&d=0. \end{cases}

Thus d>0d>0 gives a finite tail, d=0d=0 a logarithm and d<0d<0 a power divergence. All three coefficients contain the doubled complex measure; using the ordinary Euclidean area would divide them by two. For complex parameters, absolute convergence depends on their real parts. A purely oscillatory radial power at zero real part does not give absolute convergence.

Exercise 6. Crossing from changes of the modulus

Section titled “Exercise 6. Crossing from changes of the modulus”

Let I(s,t,u)I(s,t,u) denote the convergent integral in the main text, subject to s+t+u=−16/α′s+t+u=-16/\alpha'. Show that z=1−wz=1-w exchanges s,ts,t, and that z=1/wz=1/w exchanges s,us,u. Find the orbit of a generic cross-ratio under these two maps. Why should one not add six copies of the same integral for six cross-ratio values?

Solution

The first map has unit area Jacobian and exchanges ∣z∣|z| with ∣1−z∣|1-z|. Hence I(s,t,u)=I(t,s,u)I(s,t,u)=I(t,s,u).

For inversion,

d2z=∣w∣−4d2w,∣z∣=∣w∣−1,∣1−z∣=∣1−w∣ ∣w∣−1.d^2z=|w|^{-4}d^2w,\qquad |z|=|w|^{-1},\qquad |1-z|=|1-w|\,|w|^{-1}.

The net exponent of ∣w∣|w| is

(α′s2+4)+(α′t2+4)−4=−α′u2−4.\left(\frac{\alpha's}{2}+4\right) +\left(\frac{\alpha't}{2}+4\right)-4 =-\frac{\alpha'u}{2}-4.

The ∣1−w∣|1-w| exponent remains −α′t/2−4-\alpha't/2-4, giving I(s,t,u)=I(u,t,s)I(s,t,u)=I(u,t,s). Omitting the area Jacobian would change the first exponent by +4+4 and destroy this equality.

Repeated composition gives the six generic values

z,1−z,1z,11−z,zz−1,z−1z.z,\quad1-z,\quad\frac1z,\quad\frac1{1-z},\quad \frac{z}{z-1},\quad\frac{z-1}{z}.

Special cross-ratios can have a smaller orbit. These maps permute the three degeneration points and generate the channel permutations. For labeled external states, the full moduli integral is already the required amplitude; alternative labels give equal representations of it for identical tachyons. They are not extra processes to sum. Nor should one restrict to a permutation fundamental region without also reformulating the labeling and symmetry factors.

The equalities were established where all integrals converge absolutely. They extend together by analytic continuation; this argument does not separately prove every statement about residues or unitarity.

  • Joseph Polchinski, What Is String Theory? (1994), lectures at the Les Houches Summer School “Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory,” report NSF-ITP-94-97. arXiv:hep-th/9411028. Sections 2.7–2.8 explain vertex descent, coupling powers and the sphere amplitude.
  • David Tong, Lectures on String Theory (2009), arXiv:0908.0333. Sections 6.2.1–6.2.2 derive the residual sphere symmetry and the tachyon correlator; the momentum-label choice must be translated when comparing formulas.