Skip to content

The Relativistic Point Particle

A relativistic particle gives a small but complete example of the ideas behind the string worldsheet: an arbitrary coordinate labels its history, an auxiliary metric imposes a constraint, and gauge fixing leaves a modulus that must still be integrated. We will derive the scalar propagator from this worldline description. The central distinction is between the particle’s spacetime proper time, which has units of length, and the Schwinger modulus, which has units of length squared.

The global conventions fix the spacetime signature and units. Familiarity with classical mechanics and Gaussian integrals is enough for the classical discussion and the free path integral below.

A trajectory in flat spacetime is a map Xμ(λ)X^\mu(\lambda) from an interval into spacetime. Initially take the parameter to be dimensionless, 0≤λ≤10\leq\lambda\leq1, and write X˙μ=dXμ/dλ\dot X^\mu=dX^\mu/d\lambda. For a timelike curve, the positive proper-time element and total proper time are

ds=−ημνdXμdXν,ℓ=∫01dλ −X˙2.ds=\sqrt{-\eta_{\mu\nu}dX^\mu dX^\nu}, \qquad \ell=\int_0^1d\lambda\,\sqrt{-\dot X^2}.

The action of a free particle of mass m>0m>0 is

Spp=−mℓ=−m∫01dλ −X˙2.S_{\rm pp}=-m\ell =-m\int_0^1d\lambda\,\sqrt{-\dot X^2}.

The action measures worldline length, just as the Nambu–Goto action will measure worldsheet area. In a curved spacetime one replaces ημν\eta_{\mu\nu} by Gμν(X)G_{\mu\nu}(X); here we keep the target spacetime flat so that the quantum calculation is exactly Gaussian.

Consider a smooth, orientation-preserving change of parameter,

λ′=f(λ),f(0)=0,f(1)=1,f′(λ)>0.\lambda'=f(\lambda), \qquad f(0)=0,\quad f(1)=1,\quad f'(\lambda)>0.

The embedding is a scalar under this change: X′μ(λ′)=Xμ(λ)X'^\mu(\lambda')=X^\mu(\lambda). Thus

dX′μdλ′=X˙μf′,dλ′−(dX′dλ′)2=dλ−X˙2.\frac{dX'^\mu}{d\lambda'}=\frac{\dot X^\mu}{f'}, \qquad d\lambda'\sqrt{-\left(\frac{dX'}{d\lambda'}\right)^2} =d\lambda\sqrt{-\dot X^2}.

The action is unchanged. The freedom is local along the curve, so this is a gauge symmetry: different parameterized maps can represent the same geometric history.

For a future-directed timelike trajectory, X0X^0 increases monotonically. We can instead use the target time t=X0t=X^0 as the parameter, with its own endpoint interval. Writing v=dX/dt\mathbf v=d\mathbf X/dt, we obtain

Lt=−m1−v2,p=mv1−v2.L_t=-m\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2}, \qquad \mathbf p=\frac{m\mathbf v}{\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2}}.

The Hamiltonian for evolution in target time is

Ht=p⋅v−Lt=m1−v2=p2+m2.H_t=\mathbf p\cdot\mathbf v-L_t =\frac{m}{\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2}} =\sqrt{\mathbf p^2+m^2}.

This is the positive-energy branch of relativistic mechanics. The choice t=X0t=X^0 is useful classically, but treating all spacetime coordinates symmetrically will be more convenient for the covariant propagator.

The square root can be removed by introducing an independent positive function e(λ)e(\lambda), called the einbein:

S[X,e]=12∫01dλ(e−1X˙2−em2).S[X,e]=\frac12\int_0^1d\lambda \left(e^{-1}\dot X^2-e m^2\right).

Reparametrization invariance requires

e′(λ′)=e(λ)f′(λ),e′(λ′) dλ′=e(λ) dλ.e'(\lambda')=\frac{e(\lambda)}{f'(\lambda)}, \qquad e'(\lambda')\,d\lambda'=e(\lambda)\,d\lambda.

The factor e dλe\,d\lambda is an invariant measure along the parameter interval. The kinetic term is invariant as well: its two velocity factors supply (f′)−2(f')^{-2}, canceled by the factors from dλ′d\lambda' and e′−1e'^{-1}.

An einbein is the one-dimensional analogue of a vielbein. We may introduce an auxiliary Lorentzian metric γλλ=−e2\gamma_{\lambda\lambda}=-e^2 and rewrite the action as

S=−12∫dλ −γ(γλλX˙2+m2).S=-\frac12\int d\lambda\,\sqrt{-\gamma} \left(\gamma^{\lambda\lambda}\dot X^2+m^2\right).

This metric is independent of the induced metric X˙2\dot X^2 on the curve. Its normalization in this action gives [e]=L2[e]=L^2 for dimensionless λ\lambda; consequently e dλe\,d\lambda is not the spacetime proper-time element dsds. This auxiliary-metric formulation and its massless extension are discussed in Tong, §1.1.2.

With the endpoints of XX fixed, the two independent variations give

ddλ(e−1X˙μ)=0,−X˙2e2−m2=0.\frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(e^{-1}\dot X^\mu\right)=0, \qquad -\frac{\dot X^2}{e^2}-m^2=0.

The first equation states that the momentum is constant. The second is a constraint, because ee has no derivative term. For m>0m>0 on the positive-einbein branch,

e=−X˙2m.e=\frac{\sqrt{-\dot X^2}}{m}.

Substituting this expression into the action gives

12(X˙2e−em2)=−m−X˙2.\frac12\left(\frac{\dot X^2}{e}-em^2\right) =-m\sqrt{-\dot X^2}.

The two actions therefore describe the same classical massive particle. The same equation also gives the precise relation between their invariant measures:

ds=me dλ,ℓ=m∫01e dλ.ds=m e\,d\lambda, \qquad \ell=m\int_0^1e\,d\lambda.

These relations use the einbein equation of motion. They do not identify the auxiliary measure with the length of every off-shell path in a quantum path integral.

Canonical form and the meaning of zero Hamiltonian

Section titled “Canonical form and the meaning of zero Hamiltonian”

The covariant canonical momentum is Pμ=e−1X˙μP_\mu=e^{-1}\dot X_\mu. The Legendre transform gives

Hcan=e2(P2+m2),S=∫01dλ[PμX˙μ−e2(P2+m2)].H_{\rm can}=\frac e2(P^2+m^2), \qquad S=\int_0^1d\lambda \left[P_\mu\dot X^\mu-\frac e2(P^2+m^2)\right].

In this first-order form ee is explicitly a Lagrange multiplier. Its variation imposes

P2+m2=0.P^2+m^2=0.

Thus HcanH_{\rm can} vanishes on constrained trajectories. This does not mean that the particle has zero energy: HcanH_{\rm can} generates changes of the arbitrary label λ\lambda, whereas Ht=p2+m2H_t=\sqrt{\mathbf p^2+m^2} generates evolution in the physical target time after temporal gauge has been chosen.

Replacing PμP_\mu by −i∂μ-i\partial_\mu gives the wave equation

(−□+m2)ψ=0,□=ημν∂μ∂ν.(-\Box+m^2)\psi=0, \qquad \Box=\eta^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\partial_\nu.

This is the Klein–Gordon equation. The constraint alone does not choose a Green function or its boundary condition; the propagator will require a prescription for the modulus integral.

Setting m=0m=0 directly in −m∫ds-m\int ds makes that action identically zero; it cannot supply the massless particle’s equations. By contrast,

Sm=0=12∫dλ e−1X˙2S_{m=0}=\frac12\int d\lambda\,e^{-1}\dot X^2

still gives both X˙2=0\dot X^2=0 and d(e−1X˙μ)/dλ=0d(e^{-1}\dot X^\mu)/d\lambda=0. The nontrivial classical trajectories are null straight lines in flat spacetime. One cannot solve for ee by dividing by mm, but the constraint and gauge symmetry remain meaningful. In particular, a null trajectory has zero spacetime proper time without forcing its positive einbein to vanish.

Return to the fixed parameter interval [0,1][0,1]. For any smooth e(λ)>0e(\lambda)>0, define

T=∫01dλ e(λ),f(λ)=1T∫0λdu e(u).\mathcal T=\int_0^1d\lambda\,e(\lambda), \qquad f(\lambda)=\frac{1}{\mathcal T}\int_0^\lambda du\,e(u).

Then f(0)=0f(0)=0, f(1)=1f(1)=1, and f′=e/T>0f'=e/\mathcal T>0. The transformed einbein is constant:

e′(λ′)=ef′=T.e'(\lambda')=\frac{e}{f'}=\mathcal T.

This explicit map shows exactly what gauge fixing removes. It removes the variation of ee along the interval, but preserves its invariant integral T\mathcal T. No endpoint-preserving reparametrization can change that integral. Equivalently, the coordinate u=∫0λe(v) dvu=\int_0^\lambda e(v)\,dv sets the einbein to one but changes the coordinate interval to 0≤u≤T0\leq u\leq\mathcal T; the same modulus survives in its endpoint.

An einbein density is made constant by changing labels while its integral and the spacetime curve stay fixed.

An endpoint-preserving change of parameter replaces e(λ)>0e(\lambda)>0 by e′=Te'=\mathcal T, with T=∫01e dλ\mathcal T=\int_0^1e\,d\lambda. The auxiliary measure and the geometric worldline are unchanged. The drawing is schematic; label spacing is a coordinate choice, not a physical velocity measurement.

The constant-einbein action is

S[X;T]=12T∫01dλ X˙2−m2T2.S[X;\mathcal T]=\frac{1}{2\mathcal T}\int_0^1d\lambda\,\dot X^2 -\frac{m^2\mathcal T}{2}.

The parameter T\mathcal T is often called proper time in the Schwinger representation. Its dimension is L2L^2, and it equals ℓ/m\ell/m only when the massive timelike einbein constraint holds. We will call it the Schwinger modulus to keep it distinct from the spacetime proper time ℓ\ell.

Classically one must retain the constraint derived before gauge fixing. Fixing ee and varying only XX would give a straight-line equation but lose the mass-shell condition. Quantum mechanically the positive modulus remains an integration variable after the local gauge redundancy has been removed.

To calculate the free Gaussian integral, continue to Euclidean target coordinates and a positive Euclidean einbein. The oscillatory Lorentzian integral is defined by analytic continuation with its causal prescription; rotating a target coordinate alone is not a claim that a Lorentzian Gaussian becomes convergent for every real einbein. The resulting Euclidean action in constant gauge is

SE[X;T]=12T∫01dλ X˙E2+m2T2,T>0.S_E[X;\mathcal T] =\frac{1}{2\mathcal T}\int_0^1d\lambda\,\dot X_E^2 +\frac{m^2\mathcal T}{2}, \qquad \mathcal T>0.

For endpoints xi,xf∈RDx_i,x_f\in\mathbb R^D, the fixed-modulus kernel is

K(xf,xi;T)=∫X(0)=xiX(1)=xfDX e−SE[X;T].K(x_f,x_i;\mathcal T) =\int_{X(0)=x_i}^{X(1)=x_f}\mathcal D X\, e^{-S_E[X;\mathcal T]}.

Here the measure is normalized to give the identity kernel as T→0+\mathcal T\to0^+. The particle is free, so this normalization and the Gaussian calculation determine KK completely.

Separate the classical path from fluctuations

Section titled “Separate the classical path from fluctuations”

Write Δx=xf−xi\Delta x=x_f-x_i and

X(λ)=xi+λΔx+η(λ),η(0)=η(1)=0.X(\lambda)=x_i+\lambda\Delta x+\eta(\lambda), \qquad \eta(0)=\eta(1)=0.

The cross term vanishes because ∫01η˙ dλ=0\int_0^1\dot\eta\,d\lambda=0. Hence

SE=∣Δx∣22T+m2T2+12T∫01dλ η˙2.S_E=\frac{|\Delta x|^2}{2\mathcal T} +\frac{m^2\mathcal T}{2} +\frac{1}{2\mathcal T}\int_0^1d\lambda\,\dot\eta^2.

This already determines the endpoint dependence. To fix the fluctuation prefactor without a formal infinite product, use the momentum eigenstates of the Euclidean Hamiltonian H^=(−∇2+m2)/2\widehat H=(-\nabla^2+m^2)/2:

K(xf,xi;T)=⟨xf∣e−TH^∣xi⟩=∫dDp(2π)Deip⋅Δx−T(p2+m2)/2.K(x_f,x_i;\mathcal T) =\langle x_f|e^{-\mathcal T\widehat H}|x_i\rangle =\int\frac{d^Dp}{(2\pi)^D} e^{ip\cdot\Delta x-\mathcal T(p^2+m^2)/2}.

Each momentum integral is elementary:

∫−∞∞dp2πe−Tp2/2+ipa=12πTe−a2/(2T).\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dp}{2\pi} e^{-\mathcal T p^2/2+ip a} =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\mathcal T}} e^{-a^2/(2\mathcal T)}.

Multiplying the DD factors gives

K(xf,xi;T)=1(2πT)D/2exp⁡[−∣Δx∣22T−m2T2].K(x_f,x_i;\mathcal T) =\frac{1}{(2\pi\mathcal T)^{D/2}} \exp\left[-\frac{|\Delta x|^2}{2\mathcal T} -\frac{m^2\mathcal T}{2}\right].

The result has dimension L−DL^{-D}, as a position-space kernel should. It is the massless diffusion kernel multiplied by e−m2T/2e^{-m^2\mathcal T/2}.

The differential equation fixes the interpretation

Section titled “The differential equation fixes the interpretation”

Differentiating the Fourier representation gives

(∂T−12∇f2+m22)K=0,K(xf,xi;0+)=δ(D)(xf−xi).\left(\partial_{\mathcal T}-\frac12\nabla_f^2 +\frac{m^2}{2}\right)K=0, \qquad K(x_f,x_i;0^+)=\delta^{(D)}(x_f-x_i).

The second equality is a distributional limit: integrating the narrow Gaussian against a smooth test function returns that function at xix_i. Its total integral is

∫dDxf K(xf,xi;T)=e−m2T/2.\int d^Dx_f\,K(x_f,x_i;\mathcal T) =e^{-m^2\mathcal T/2}.

Thus a massive kernel does not conserve the integral of the diffusion density. The kernels nevertheless obey the composition law

∫dDy K(xf,y;T2)K(y,xi;T1)=K(xf,xi;T1+T2),\int d^Dy\,K(x_f,y;\mathcal T_2) K(y,x_i;\mathcal T_1) =K(x_f,x_i;\mathcal T_1+\mathcal T_2),

which follows either from multiplication of e−TH^e^{-\mathcal T\widehat H} or from a Gaussian convolution.

Integrating the modulus gives the propagator

Section titled “Integrating the modulus gives the propagator”

A fixed-modulus kernel is not yet a relativistic Green function. For m2>0m^2>0, the Euclidean inverse of −∇2+m2-\nabla^2+m^2 is

GE(xf,xi)=12∫0∞dT K(xf,xi;T).G_E(x_f,x_i)=\frac12\int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\, K(x_f,x_i;\mathcal T).

In momentum space the statement is simply

12∫0∞dT e−T(p2+m2)/2=1p2+m2.\frac12\int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\, e^{-\mathcal T(p^2+m^2)/2} =\frac{1}{p^2+m^2}.

The factor 1/21/2 is required by the 1/21/2 in the Hamiltonian; omitting it doubles the Green function. If we instead use tS=T/2t_{\rm S}=\mathcal T/2, the formula takes the familiar form A−1=∫0∞dtS e−tSAA^{-1}=\int_0^\infty dt_{\rm S}\,e^{-t_{\rm S}A} with A=−∇2+m2A=-\nabla^2+m^2. Both tSt_{\rm S} and T\mathcal T have units of length squared. This operator identity fixes the normalization of the gauge-fixed interval path integral. Worldline representations of propagators and effective actions are developed in Schubert, §§1 and 3.

The source equation is an especially useful check. Since (−∇f2+m2)K=−2∂TK(-\nabla_f^2+m^2)K=-2\partial_{\mathcal T}K,

(−∇f2+m2)GE=−∫0∞dT ∂TK=K(0+)−K(∞)=δ(D)(xf−xi).\begin{aligned} (-\nabla_f^2+m^2)G_E &=-\int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\, \partial_{\mathcal T}K\\ &=K(0^+)-K(\infty) =\delta^{(D)}(x_f-x_i). \end{aligned}

The short-modulus endpoint produces the delta-function source. The large-modulus boundary term vanishes for positive m2m^2; massless limits require an infrared check. At separated points the massless integral converges for D>2D>2, whereas in D≤2D\leq2 it needs an infrared prescription. Coincident-point ultraviolet singularities are understood distributionally rather than as finite values of GEG_E.

The fixed-modulus heat kernel evolves with half the Klein–Gordon operator, and integrating half of its modulus measure produces the inverse operator.

For the free scalar in Euclidean space, K(T)K(\mathcal T) is the kernel of e−TA/2e^{-\mathcal T A/2}, where A=−∇2+m2A=-\nabla^2+m^2. The integral 12∫0∞dT\frac12\int_0^\infty d\mathcal T gives A−1A^{-1}, and the boundary value K(0+)=δK(0^+)=\delta supplies the Green-function source. Positive m2m^2 ensures decay at large modulus; the diagram represents operator relations, not a spacetime trajectory.

Returning to Lorentzian momentum, the Feynman two-point function has the mostly-plus-signature form

G~F(p)=−ip2+m2−i0=12lim⁡ϵ→0+∫0∞dT e−iT(p2+m2−iϵ)/2.\widetilde G_F(p)=\frac{-i}{p^2+m^2-i0} =\frac12\lim_{\epsilon\to0^+} \int_0^\infty d\mathcal T\, e^{-i\mathcal T(p^2+m^2-i\epsilon)/2}.

The exponent includes −ϵT/2-\epsilon\mathcal T/2, so the regulator damps large T\mathcal T and fixes the pole prescription. Since p2=−(p0)2+p2p^2=-(p^0)^2+\mathbf p^2, this is the usual i/[(p0)2−p2−m2+i0]i/[(p^0)^2-\mathbf p^2-m^2+i0].

A propagator is an inverse differential operator with specified boundary conditions, not simply a projection onto on-shell momenta. Integrating an oscillatory exponential over the entire real modulus axis would instead produce a delta function of p2+m2p^2+m^2. The positive half-line and its convergence prescription are therefore part of the physical definition of the propagator.

The particle construction isolates the steps that will reappear for strings:

ParticleString
Embedding Xμ(λ)X^\mu(\lambda) of a lineEmbedding Xμ(τ,σ)X^\mu(\tau,\sigma) of a surface
Action proportional to proper lengthNambu–Goto action proportional to area
Independent einbein eeIndependent worldsheet metric habh_{ab}
Einbein variation imposes P2+m2=0P^2+m^2=0Metric variation imposes worldsheet stress-tensor constraints
Interval gauge fixing leaves T\mathcal TWorldsheet gauge fixing can leave moduli depending on topology and insertions

The string has an additional feature: in two dimensions its auxiliary-metric action has Weyl symmetry. The consequences of that symmetry and its quantum anomaly will occupy much of the course. The immediate next step is the Nambu–Goto string and its symmetries.

Expand the temporal-gauge Lagrangian through fourth order in ∣v∣|\mathbf v|. Compute its exact momentum and Hamiltonian, and explain why the constant term in the Lagrangian can be discarded for the classical trajectory while the rest energy still appears in HtH_t.

Solution

Using 1−u=1−u/2−u2/8+O(u3)\sqrt{1-u}=1-u/2-u^2/8+O(u^3),

Lt=−m+m2v2+m8(v2)2+O(∣v∣6).L_t=-m+\frac m2\mathbf v^2+\frac m8(\mathbf v^2)^2 +O(|\mathbf v|^6).

Direct differentiation of the unexpanded expression gives

p=mv1−v2,Ht=p⋅v−Lt=m1−v2=p2+m2.\mathbf p=\frac{m\mathbf v}{\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2}}, \qquad H_t=\mathbf p\cdot\mathbf v-L_t =\frac{m}{\sqrt{1-\mathbf v^2}} =\sqrt{\mathbf p^2+m^2}.

Adding mm to LtL_t changes the action by m(tf−ti)m(t_f-t_i) for fixed endpoints and does not change the Euler–Lagrange equation. It shifts the Hamiltonian by −m-m, choosing kinetic energy rather than total relativistic energy as the zero of energy. The covariant mass-shell relation still involves the total energy EE and reads E2=p2+m2E^2=\mathbf p^2+m^2.

Let e(λ)=e0(1+aλ)e(\lambda)=e_0(1+a\lambda) with e0>0e_0>0 and a>−1a>-1 on [0,1][0,1]. Find the modulus and the endpoint-preserving gauge map, verify the transformed einbein explicitly, and explain why one cannot impose e′=1e'=1 on the same dimensionless interval for every e0e_0.

Solution

Integration gives

T=e0(1+a2),f(λ)=λ+aλ2/21+a/2.\mathcal T=e_0\left(1+\frac a2\right), \qquad f(\lambda)=\frac{\lambda+a\lambda^2/2}{1+a/2}.

The endpoint values are 0,10,1, and

f′(λ)=1+aλ1+a/2>0,e(λ)f′(λ)=e0(1+a2)=T.f'(\lambda)=\frac{1+a\lambda}{1+a/2}>0, \qquad \frac{e(\lambda)}{f'(\lambda)} =e_0\left(1+\frac a2\right)=\mathcal T.

The integral ∫e dλ\int e\,d\lambda is invariant. After a length unit has been chosen, e′=1e'=1 on [0,1][0,1] would fix that integral to one and discard all other moduli; it is not an allowed gauge choice for arbitrary e0e_0. Taking u=∫0λe(v) dvu=\int_0^\lambda e(v)\,dv does produce unit einbein, but the new coordinate has units L2L^2 and interval [0,T][0,\mathcal T].

For m=0m=0 and constant e=T>0e=\mathcal T>0, solve the classical equations. Show that a nonzero target energy is compatible with a vanishing canonical Hamiltonian and vanishing spacetime proper time.

Solution

The momentum is constant, so

Xμ(λ)=xiμ+TPμλ,P2=0.X^\mu(\lambda)=x_i^\mu+\mathcal T P^\mu\lambda, \qquad P^2=0.

For example, Pμ=(E,E,0,…,0)P^\mu=(E,E,0,\ldots,0) with E>0E>0 is a nonzero null momentum. Then X˙2=T2P2=0\dot X^2=\mathcal T^2P^2=0 and ℓ=0\ell=0, while

Hcan=T2P2=0,E=P0>0.H_{\rm can}=\frac{\mathcal T}{2}P^2=0, \qquad E=P^0>0.

The zero Hamiltonian generates gauge evolution in λ\lambda; the nonzero EE generates target-time translations. Nullness places no requirement that T\mathcal T vanish. For prescribed endpoints a classical solution of this kind exists only when their separation is null (or zero).

Prove the heat-kernel composition law directly in momentum space, including all Fourier factors and the mass dependence.

Solution

Insert one Fourier representation for each kernel. The integral over the intermediate point is

∫dDy e−ip⋅y+iq⋅y=(2π)Dδ(D)(q−p).\int d^Dy\,e^{-ip\cdot y+iq\cdot y} =(2\pi)^D\delta^{(D)}(q-p).

It removes one momentum integral and one factor (2π)−D(2\pi)^{-D}. The remaining expression is

∫dDp(2π)Deip⋅(xf−xi)e−(T1+T2)(p2+m2)/2,\int\frac{d^Dp}{(2\pi)^D} e^{ip\cdot(x_f-x_i)} e^{-(\mathcal T_1+\mathcal T_2)(p^2+m^2)/2},

which is precisely K(xf,xi;T1+T2)K(x_f,x_i;\mathcal T_1+\mathcal T_2). The mass factors multiply to e−m2(T1+T2)/2e^{-m^2(\mathcal T_1+\mathcal T_2)/2}, as required. The law expresses the sum over every possible intermediate position; no integration over an additional modulus is involved in this fixed-modulus composition.

5. Derive two position-space Green functions

Section titled “5. Derive two position-space Green functions”

At separation r=∣xf−xi∣>0r=|x_f-x_i|>0, evaluate GEG_E for (a) a massless scalar in D=4D=4 and (b) a scalar with m>0m>0 in D=3D=3. For part (b) you may use

∫0∞dT T−3/2e−a/T−bT=πa e−2ab,a,b>0.\int_0^\infty dT\,T^{-3/2}e^{-a/T-bT} =\sqrt{\frac\pi a}\,e^{-2\sqrt{ab}}, \qquad a,b>0.

Check the massless limit of the three-dimensional result.

Solution

For D=4,m=0D=4,m=0,

GE(r)=18π2∫0∞dTT2e−r2/(2T).G_E(r)=\frac{1}{8\pi^2} \int_0^\infty\frac{d\mathcal T}{\mathcal T^2} e^{-r^2/(2\mathcal T)}.

Set u=r2/(2T)u=r^2/(2\mathcal T). Then dT/T2=−2 du/r2d\mathcal T/\mathcal T^2=-2\,du/r^2, with reversed endpoints, and

GE(r)=14π2r2∫0∞e−u du=14π2r2.G_E(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi^2r^2}\int_0^\infty e^{-u}\,du =\frac{1}{4\pi^2r^2}.

For D=3D=3, apply the supplied identity with a=r2/2a=r^2/2 and b=m2/2b=m^2/2:

GE(r)=12(2π)3/22πr2 e−mr=e−mr4πr.\begin{aligned} G_E(r) &=\frac{1}{2(2\pi)^{3/2}} \sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{r^2}}\,e^{-mr}\\ &=\frac{e^{-mr}}{4\pi r}. \end{aligned}

Its massless limit is 1/(4πr)1/(4\pi r). The dimensions are L−2L^{-2} in four dimensions and L−1L^{-1} in three, agreeing with [GE]=L2−D[G_E]=L^{2-D}. Both expressions are singular at r=0r=0, where their Green equations hold as distributional identities.

6. Relate the Euclidean saddle to geometric length

Section titled “6. Relate the Euclidean saddle to geometric length”

For a straight Euclidean path of length r>0r>0 and m>0m>0, extremize the classical exponent

SE,cl(T)=r22T+m2T2.S_{E,\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal T) =\frac{r^2}{2\mathcal T}+\frac{m^2\mathcal T}{2}.

Find the stationary modulus and action. Explain what happens for m=0m=0, and why this exercise does not assert that the full modulus integrand is stationary at the same point.

Solution

The derivative vanishes when

−r22T2+m22=0,T∗=rm.-\frac{r^2}{2\mathcal T^2}+\frac{m^2}{2}=0, \qquad \mathcal T_* =\frac r m.

The second derivative r2/T3r^2/\mathcal T^3 is positive, and substitution gives SE,cl(T∗)=mrS_{E,\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal T_*)=mr. Thus r=mT∗r=m\mathcal T_*, the Euclidean counterpart of the massive length relation. The minimum is also immediate from the arithmetic–geometric mean inequality applied to the two positive terms.

For m=0m=0 and r>0r>0, the exponent decreases toward zero as T→∞\mathcal T\to\infty and has no finite stationary point. The full kernel contains the fluctuation factor T−D/2\mathcal T^{-D/2}, so the negative logarithm of its modulus integrand also contains (D/2)log⁡(T/T0)(D/2)\log(\mathcal T/\mathcal T_0), where a fixed reference modulus T0\mathcal T_0 only changes an irrelevant additive constant. Its stationary point differs from that of the classical exponent. The geometric saddle controls a semiclassical approximation when mrmr is large, not an exact localization of the quantum integral.

  • Schubert, Christian. “Perturbative Quantum Field Theory in the String-Inspired Formalism.” Physics Reports 355 (2001), 73–234. arXiv:hep-th/0101036; doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00013-8. Sections 1 and 3 explain worldline path integrals and Schwinger representations; the loop applications go beyond this page’s open interval.
  • Tong, David. Lectures on String Theory. University of Cambridge Part III lecture notes, 2009. arXiv:0908.0333, §1.1, especially §§1.1.1–1.1.2 on quantization and the einbein.