Skip to content

Light-Cone Quantization and the Critical Dimension

Light-cone quantization solves the string constraints before quantizing. Its independent oscillators describe only the transverse motion, so their Fock space has a positive inner product. The difficult question becomes whether these variables still carry the full spacetime Lorentz symmetry. For the ordinary bosonic string in flat, noncompact spacetime with D≥4D\geq4, the quantum boost commutator fixes D=26D=26 and the open-string intercept a=1a=1.

We will derive this result, including the operator ordering and the finite sums responsible for the anomaly. We then reconstruct the closed string and explain level matching as the condition that its longitudinal coordinate actually closes. The global conventions, canonical oscillator construction, and covariant physical-state analysis supply the prerequisites. We consider free strings, with Neumann conditions in every open-string target direction; interactions and compact winding sectors are outside this calculation.

Light-cone time and the domain of the gauge

Section titled “Light-cone time and the domain of the gauge”

Introduce target-space null coordinates

X±=X0±XD−12.X^\pm=\frac{X^0\pm X^{D-1}}{\sqrt2}.

Then the transverse coordinates are XiX^i, with i=1,…,di=1,\ldots,d and d=D−2d=D-2, and

dX⋅dX=−2 dX+dX−+dXidXi.dX\cdot dX=-2\,dX^+dX^-+dX^i dX^i.

The worldsheet constraints in conformal gauge are

C±±=(∂±X)2=0.C_{\pm\pm}=(\partial_\pm X)^2=0.

If X+X^+ can be made proportional to worldsheet time, these equations become linear in the derivatives of X−X^-:

∂±X−=∂±Xi∂±Xi2∂±X+.\partial_\pm X^-= \frac{\partial_\pm X^i\partial_\pm X^i}{2\partial_\pm X^+}.

Thus the longitudinal coordinate is reconstructed from transverse motion. It does not supply another independent oscillator.

For an open string, the Neumann condition identifies the two chiral functions of X+X^+. Write

X+=F(σ+)+F(σ−),F(s+2π)=F(s)+2πα′p+.X^+=F(\sigma^+)+F(\sigma^-), \qquad F(s+2\pi)=F(s)+2\pi\alpha'p^+.

The allowed residual transformation preserving both strip boundaries uses a common lift:

σ′+=f(σ+),σ′−=f(σ−),f(s+2π)=f(s)+2π.\sigma^{\prime+}=f(\sigma^+),\qquad \sigma^{\prime-}=f(\sigma^-),\qquad f(s+2\pi)=f(s)+2\pi.

For p+≠0p^+\neq0, a candidate is

f(s)=F(s)−F(0)α′p+.f(s)=\frac{F(s)-F(0)}{\alpha'p^+}.

It is a regular transformation in the connected orientation-preserving component when f′(s)>0f'(s)>0 everywhere. In that sector,

X+=2F(0)+2α′p+τ′.X^+=2F(0)+2\alpha'p^+\tau'.

Dropping the prime and naming the constant x+x^+ gives the open-string light-cone gauge

X+=x++2α′p+τ,αn+=0(n≠0).X^+=x^++2\alpha'p^+\tau, \qquad \alpha_n^+=0\quad(n\neq0).

This construction explains both a local condition and a global one. The chiral derivatives must permit a nonsingular monotone map, and the map must preserve the strip identifications. The common lift ensures the latter, but nonzero average momentum p+p^+ alone does not guarantee the required regularity. A derivative that vanishes can make the inverse map singular; a derivative that changes sign prevents a monotone inverse. We work within this regular gauge sector, usually choosing its p+>0p^+>0 branch.

For a closed string with no winding in X+X^+, the two chiral functions have equal monodromies. Independent monotone lifts can then give

X+=x++α′p+τ.X^+=x^++\alpha'p^+\tau.

The factor of two differs because the open strip has coordinate width π\pi and the closed circle has period 2π2\pi, with the zero modes fixed in page 06. A choice of worldsheet clock is involved here, not merely a choice of spacetime Lorentz frame.

A positive average derivative does not guarantee a regular monotone residual map.

On the open strip both chiral coordinates use the same lift f(s+2π)=f(s)+2πf(s+2\pi)=f(s)+2\pi. The two dimensionless derivative profiles have mean one, but only the strictly positive profile defines a regular map in the chosen component. A negative interval cannot be repaired by the nonzero average. The horizontal coordinate covers one period; the vertical axis is f′(s)f'(s).

First perform the classical reduction. For the open string, the Fourier coefficients of C±±=0C_{\pm\pm}=0 give

0=Ln=−α0+αn−+Ln⊥,Ln⊥=12∑m∈Zαn−miαmi.0=L_n=-\alpha_0^+\alpha_n^-+L_n^\perp, \qquad L_n^\perp=\frac12\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z} \alpha_{n-m}^i\alpha_m^i.

Only the transverse modes remain independent. Their reduced brackets quantize to

[αmi,αnj]=m δijδm+n,0,(αni)†=α−ni.[\alpha_m^i,\alpha_n^j] =m\,\delta^{ij}\delta_{m+n,0}, \qquad (\alpha_n^i)^\dagger=\alpha_{-n}^i.

We therefore define the quantum transverse generators by oscillator normal ordering,

Ln⊥=12∑m:αn−miαmi:,N=∑n>0α−niαni,L_n^\perp=\frac12\sum_m:\alpha_{n-m}^i\alpha_m^i:, \qquad N=\sum_{n>0}\alpha_{-n}^i\alpha_n^i,

so that

L0⊥=α′pi2+N.L_0^\perp=\alpha'p_i^2+N.

For the calculation below, abbreviate the open-string plus zero mode by q=α0+=2α′p+q=\alpha_0^+=\sqrt{2\alpha'}p^+. The reconstructed longitudinal modes, including a possible quantum constant aa, are

αn−=Ln⊥−aδn0q.\alpha_n^-=\frac{L_n^\perp-a\delta_{n0}}{q}.

For n≠0n\neq0 this is a bilinear composite operator. At n=0n=0, using α0−=2α′p−\alpha_0^-=\sqrt{2\alpha'}p^-, it yields

p−=pi2+(N−a)/α′2p+,M2=2p+p−−pi2=N−aα′.p^-= \frac{p_i^2+(N-a)/\alpha'}{2p^+}, \qquad M^2=2p^+p^- -p_i^2=\frac{N-a}{\alpha'}.

The positive modes annihilate the transverse vacuum. With bni=αni/nb_n^i=\alpha_n^i/\sqrt n for n>0n>0, each pair bni,(bni)†b_n^i,(b_n^i)^\dagger is an ordinary harmonic oscillator. In particular,

∥(α−ni)r∣0⟩∥2=nrr!>0,[N,α−ni]=nα−ni.\left\|(\alpha_{-n}^i)^r|0\rangle\right\|^2 =n^r r!>0, \qquad [N,\alpha_{-n}^i]=n\alpha_{-n}^i.

There are dd independent oscillators at each positive frequency, and NN measures their frequency-weighted occupation. Positivity of this oscillator space holds before the Lorentz test. It does not by itself ensure that the theory is Lorentz invariant or that its vacuum is stable.

This procedure is not an instruction to impose every unreduced quantum LnL_n as an operator identity. We solved the classical constraints, then quantized the independent transverse variables. The longitudinal operators consequently have composite commutators. For example,

[αm−,αni]=−nqαm+ni.[\alpha_m^-,\alpha_n^i] =-\frac{n}{q}\alpha_{m+n}^i.

The central extension of Ln⊥L_n^\perp will be essential rather than inconsistent. It is precisely the effect that the Lorentz calculation detects.

Transverse oscillators determine both longitudinal modes and the light-cone Hamiltonian.

For the open string, q=2α′p+q=\sqrt{2\alpha'}p^+ is dimensionless. Nonzero longitudinal modes are composites of the transverse modes, whereas the zero mode fixes p−p^-. The separate closed-string condition is global: for a noncompact longitudinal coordinate, periodicity of the reconstructed X−X^- requires equal left and right levels. The arrows describe dependencies, not motion in spacetime.

The transverse oscillators have dimensionless frequencies nn in the standard open-strip coordinates. Their formal vacuum energy is d∑n>0n/2d\sum_{n>0}n/2, which diverges. Introduce a positive dimensionless regulator ϵ\epsilon:

E0(ϵ)=d2∑n=1∞ne−ϵn=d2e−ϵ(1−e−ϵ)2=d2ϵ2−d24+O(ϵ2).\begin{aligned} E_0(\epsilon) &=\frac d2\sum_{n=1}^\infty n e^{-\epsilon n} =\frac d2\frac{e^{-\epsilon}}{(1-e^{-\epsilon})^2}\\ &=\frac{d}{2\epsilon^2}-\frac d{24}+O(\epsilon^2). \end{aligned}

The leading term is the local ultraviolet vacuum-energy divergence. Subtracting it leaves the finite Casimir contribution

E0,finite=−d24.E_{0,\mathrm{finite}}=-\frac d{24}.

Writing the light-cone mass operator as α′M2=N−a\alpha'M^2=N-a therefore suggests

a=d24.a=\frac d{24}.

Zeta regularization gives the same finite value, but the ordinary divergent series never equals −1/12-1/12. The regulator makes the subtraction explicit. A finite constant cannot be chosen arbitrarily once the spacetime symmetry is required: we will keep aa independent in the boost calculation and obtain a second test of its value.

Three constants that appear in nearby discussions must remain distinct. Plane matter L0L_0 is defined by its oscillator ordering. Mapping all DD matter scalars to the cylinder gives a shift −D/24-D/24 per chiral sector. The reduced transverse system contains d=D−2d=D-2 scalars and gives −d/24-d/24; its negative is the physical intercept aa. At the critical point this is a=1a=1. A closed string has two transverse chiral sectors, each with that intercept.

The nontrivial generators are J−iJ^{-i}. They mix the longitudinal direction, which has been reconstructed, with a transverse direction. The remaining Lorentz commutators follow directly from the canonical zero modes and transverse rotations. Lorentz symmetry requires

[J−i,J−j]=0.[J^{-i},J^{-j}]=0.

We calculate this for the open string. The oscillator derivation below uses a finite number of operations on every finite-level state. Goddard, Goldstone, Rebbi and Thorn established the light-cone construction; Bering gives a complementary direct calculation of the composite-operator commutator.

For this calculation define dimensionless zero-mode variables

y−=x−2α′,yi=xi2α′,qi=2α′pi,h=L0⊥−a.y^-=\frac{x^-}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}},\qquad y^i=\frac{x^i}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}},\qquad q_i=\sqrt{2\alpha'}p^i, \qquad h=L_0^\perp-a.

Together with q=2α′p+q=\sqrt{2\alpha'}p^+, their independent nonzero brackets are

[y−,q]=−i,[yi,qj]=iδij.[y^-,q]=-i, \qquad [y^i,q_j]=i\delta^i{}_j.

Introduce the antisymmetric bilinear AnijA_n^{ij}, transverse spin SijS^{ij}, and Hermitian cubic operator EiE^i:

Anij=α−niαnj−α−njαni,Sij=−i∑n>0Anijn,Ei=i∑n>01n(α−niLn⊥−L−n⊥αni).\begin{aligned} A_n^{ij}&=\alpha_{-n}^i\alpha_n^j-\alpha_{-n}^j\alpha_n^i,\\ S^{ij}&=-i\sum_{n>0}\frac{A_n^{ij}}{n},\\ E^i&=i\sum_{n>0}\frac1n \left(\alpha_{-n}^i L_n^\perp-L_{-n}^\perp\alpha_n^i\right). \end{aligned}

The generator obtained from ∫dσ (X−Πi−XiΠ−)\int d\sigma\,(X^-\Pi^i-X^i\Pi^-) is

J−i=ℓi+Eiq,ℓi=y−qi−12q{yi,h}.J^{-i}=\ell^i+\frac{E^i}{q}, \qquad \ell^i=y^-q_i-\frac{1}{2q}\{y^i,h\}.

Here {A,B}=AB+BA\{A,B\}=AB+BA. In dimensional variables, the orbital part is x−pi−{xi,p−}/2x^-p^i-\{x^i,p^-\}/2. Symmetrization is required because [xi,p−]=ipi/p+[x^i,p^-]=i p^i/p^+; the unsymmetrized expression would not be Hermitian. Each EiE^i is Hermitian because the two products inside its parentheses are adjoints. Both parts of J−iJ^{-i} are dimensionless, as an angular momentum must be in our units.

The elementary identities needed below are

[Lm⊥,αni]=−nαm+ni,[Lm⊥,Ln⊥]=(m−n)Lm+n⊥+d12(m3−m)δm+n,0,[yi,Ln⊥]=iαni,[yi,Ej]=iSij,[L0⊥,Ei]=[L0⊥,Sij]=0.\begin{aligned} [L_m^\perp,\alpha_n^i]&=-n\alpha_{m+n}^i,\\ [L_m^\perp,L_n^\perp] &=(m-n)L_{m+n}^\perp +\frac d{12}(m^3-m)\delta_{m+n,0},\\ [y^i,L_n^\perp]&=i\alpha_n^i,\\ [y^i,E^j]&=iS^{ij},\qquad [L_0^\perp,E^i]=[L_0^\perp,S^{ij}]=0. \end{aligned}

For example, the third identity differentiates the two zero-mode terms in Ln⊥L_n^\perp; substituting it in EjE^j gives the fourth. The transverse central term follows from the same contractions as on page 06, with DD replaced by dd.

For i≠ji\neq j, split ℓi=Ui+Vi\ell^i=U^i+V^i with Ui=y−qiU^i=y^-q_i and Vi=−{yi,h}/(2q)V^i=-\{y^i,h\}/(2q). Since [y−,q−1]=iq−2[y^-,q^{-1}]=i q^{-2},

[Ui,Uj]=0,[Ui,Vj]=−iqi2q2{yj,h},[Vi,Vj]=i2q2(qi{yj,h}−qj{yi,h}).\begin{aligned} [U^i,U^j]&=0,\\ [U^i,V^j]&=-\frac{i q_i}{2q^2}\{y^j,h\},\\ [V^i,V^j]&=\frac{i}{2q^2} \left(q_i\{y^j,h\}-q_j\{y^i,h\}\right). \end{aligned}

The last two lines cancel after antisymmetrization: [ℓi,ℓj]=0[\ell^i,\ell^j]=0. The mixed terms are

[ℓi,Ejq]−[ℓj,Eiq]=i(qiEj−qjEi)−2ihSijq2.\left[\ell^i,\frac{E^j}{q}\right] -\left[\ell^j,\frac{E^i}{q}\right] =\frac{i(q_iE^j-q_jE^i)-2ihS^{ij}}{q^2}.

Consequently the entire obstruction is

q2[J−i,J−j]=[Ei,Ej]+i(qiEj−qjEi)−2ihSij.q^2[J^{-i},J^{-j}] =[E^i,E^j]+i(q_iE^j-q_jE^i)-2ihS^{ij}.

This equation includes the zero modes and their ordering. Keeping only the oscillator part of the boost would miss the hSijhS^{ij} contribution and give a wrong result.

Each EiE^i is cubic in the transverse modes when zero modes are counted as modes. In its commutator, terms with a single oscillator contraction are quartic; terms with further contractions have lower degree. The quartic terms reproduce the classical reduced Poisson bracket and cancel against the other terms in the last equation.

There is a structural reason for this cancellation that does not assume the quantum answer. The classical Noether charges satisfy the Lorentz Poisson algebra before gauge fixing. They commute with the string constraints, which are target-space Lorentz scalars. In the Dirac bracket for a constraint together with its gauge condition, every correction to a bracket of two such charges contains a bracket with the constraint. Those corrections vanish on the constraint surface. Thus classical reduction preserves the Lorentz algebra. A single contraction in the normal-ordered quantum products is exactly this classical bracket, so it cannot leave a quartic anomaly.

The remaining operator preserves oscillator level, is antisymmetric in i,ji,j, and is quadratic in nonzero oscillators. A scalar remainder cannot have these antisymmetric indices. Level preservation pairs a creator and annihilator at the same mode number. Terms with transverse zero modes cannot contribute a further quantum remainder: two bilinears containing zero modes have only their classical commutator, and a possible linear nonzero-mode remainder would violate level preservation. Therefore

q2[J−i,J−j]=∑n>0AnAnij,q^2[J^{-i},J^{-j}] =\sum_{n>0}\mathcal A_n A_n^{ij},

with coefficients independent of qiq_i. It is enough to find each coefficient between single-oscillator states at qi=0q_i=0. This is an extraction of the full quadratic remainder, not an assumption that a check at one level proves the algebra.

Use unnormalized states

∣n,j⟩=α−nj∣0⟩,⟨n,i∣n,j⟩=nδij,qi=0.|n,j\rangle=\alpha_{-n}^j|0\rangle, \qquad \langle n,i|n,j\rangle=n\delta^{ij}, \qquad q_i=0.

The Virasoro–oscillator identity gives

Ei∣n,j⟩=in∑k=1n−1α−kiα−(n−k)jk∣0⟩−iδij∣Qn⟩,E^i|n,j\rangle =i n\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}\frac{\alpha_{-k}^i\alpha_{-(n-k)}^j}{k}|0\rangle -i\delta^{ij}|Q_n\rangle,

where

∣Qn⟩=L−n⊥∣0⟩=12∑k=1n−1α−krα−(n−k)r∣0⟩.|Q_n\rangle=L_{-n}^\perp|0\rangle =\frac12\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \alpha_{-k}^r\alpha_{-(n-k)}^r|0\rangle.

The sum is empty for n=1n=1. To evaluate the matrix element for i≠ji\neq j, define the first term without its factor ii by

∣Bnij⟩=n∑k=1n−1α−kiα−(n−k)jk∣0⟩.|B_n^{ij}\rangle =n\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}\frac{\alpha_{-k}^i\alpha_{-(n-k)}^j}{k}|0\rangle.

The required contractions are

⟨Qn∣Qn⟩=d2∑k=1n−1k(n−k)=d12n(n2−1),⟨Bnii∣Qn⟩=n∑k=1n−1(n−k)=n2(n−1)2,⟨Bnji∣Bnij⟩=n2∑k=1n−11=n2(n−1),⟨Bnii∣Bnjj⟩=0(i≠j).\begin{aligned} \langle Q_n|Q_n\rangle &=\frac d2\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k(n-k) =\frac d{12}n(n^2-1),\\ \langle B_n^{ii}|Q_n\rangle &=n\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(n-k) =\frac{n^2(n-1)}2,\\ \langle B_n^{ji}|B_n^{ij}\rangle &=n^2\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}1=n^2(n-1),\\ \langle B_n^{ii}|B_n^{jj}\rangle&=0\quad(i\neq j). \end{aligned}

The first line has two Wick pairings and a sum over dd transverse species. In the third, the two different species force the mode numbers in the two states to be complementary. Hermiticity of EiE^i now gives

⟨n,i∣[Ei,Ej]∣n,j⟩=⟨Ei(n,i)∣Ej(n,j)⟩−⟨Ej(n,i)∣Ei(n,j)⟩=d12n(n2−1)−2n2(n−1).\begin{aligned} \langle n,i|[E^i,E^j]|n,j\rangle &=\langle E^i(n,i)|E^j(n,j)\rangle -\langle E^j(n,i)|E^i(n,j)\rangle\\ &=\frac d{12}n(n^2-1)-2n^2(n-1). \end{aligned}

There is no summation over the external i,ji,j. At qi=0q_i=0, the mixed contribution follows from

⟨n,i∣Sij∣n,j⟩=−in,h∣n,j⟩=(n−a)∣n,j⟩.\langle n,i|S^{ij}|n,j\rangle=-in, \qquad h|n,j\rangle=(n-a)|n,j\rangle.

It is −2n(n−a)-2n(n-a). Combining both contributions and using ⟨n,i∣Anij∣n,j⟩=n2\langle n,i|A_n^{ij}|n,j\rangle=n^2 yields

n2An=d12n(n2−1)−2n2(n−1)−2n(n−a),An=(d12−2)n+1n(2a−d12).\begin{aligned} n^2\mathcal A_n &=\frac d{12}n(n^2-1)-2n^2(n-1)-2n(n-a),\\ \mathcal A_n &=\left(\frac d{12}-2\right)n +\frac1n\left(2a-\frac d{12}\right). \end{aligned}

We have therefore obtained the commutator with its full normalization:

[J−i,J−j]=12α′(p+)2∑n>0An(α−niαnj−α−njαni).[J^{-i},J^{-j}] =\frac{1}{2\alpha'(p^+)^2} \sum_{n>0}\mathcal A_n \left(\alpha_{-n}^i\alpha_n^j-\alpha_{-n}^j\alpha_n^i\right).

The right-hand side is anti-Hermitian, as a commutator of Hermitian generators must be. Its prefactor is dimensionless. The central-charge term and the intercept term have been determined separately, rather than inferred by substituting the expected critical values.

For at least two transverse directions, the operators AnijA_n^{ij} are nonzero and independent for different nn. The first two tests already give

A1=2(a−1),A2∣a=1=D−268.\mathcal A_1=2(a-1), \qquad \left.\mathcal A_2\right|_{a=1}=\frac{D-26}{8}.

Hence Lorentz closure requires a=1a=1 and D=26D=26, and these values make every An\mathcal A_n vanish. They also agree with the regulated intercept a=d/24a=d/24. This is the critical bosonic string.

The assumption D≥4D\geq4 matters for this particular argument. In three target dimensions there is only one transverse index, so the antisymmetric dangerous commutator vanishes identically. It cannot impose these two conditions; Mezincescu and Townsend discuss this lower-dimensional possibility. This observation alone says nothing about modular invariance or a full interacting theory.

Independent oscillator-mode tests fix the intercept first and the target dimension second.

For the flat open bosonic string with D≥4D\geq4, the n=1n=1 matrix element of the boost commutator fixes a=1a=1. The independent n=2n=2 test then fixes D=26D=26. Both conditions make the full anomaly vanish, not just these two matrix elements. The diagram summarizes the ordered-operator calculation; it is not a spacetime geometry.

At the critical values, the transverse Fock description agrees with the old covariant physical space after quotienting null states. The all-level equivalence and no-ghost statement are theorems, not consequences of counting a few levels. The previous page explains the wider free-state no-ghost domain and why it is distinct from critical interacting-string consistency.

At D=26,a=1D=26,a=1, the free open-string masses obey α′M2=N−1\alpha'M^2=N-1. The first levels illustrate how manifest SO(24)SO(24) oscillator states form spacetime representations:

LevelOscillator familiesNumber of statesMass squared
00vacuum11−1/α′-1/\alpha'
11α−1i\alpha_{-1}^i242400
22α−2i\alpha_{-2}^i, α−1iα−1j\alpha_{-1}^i\alpha_{-1}^j24+300=32424+300=3241/α′1/\alpha'
33α−3i\alpha_{-3}^i, α−2iα−1j\alpha_{-2}^i\alpha_{-1}^j, α−1iα−1jα−1k\alpha_{-1}^i\alpha_{-1}^j\alpha_{-1}^k24+576+2600=320024+576+2600=32002/α′2/\alpha'

The vacuum is a tachyon, which signals an unstable bosonic-string vacuum despite the positive oscillator norm. At nonzero null momentum, level one has the 2424 polarizations of a massless vector. These statements concern different issues: a norm is not a mass squared.

At level two, split the symmetric product of two SO(24)SO(24) vectors into its traceless part and trace. The oscillator content is then

324=299+24+1.324=299+24+1.

This is the restriction of a traceless symmetric rank-two tensor of SO(25)SO(25) to its SO(24)SO(24) subgroup. To see the branching, write a traceless tensor HABH_{AB} with A=(i,25)A=(i,25). Its components are a traceless part of HijH_{ij}, a vector Hi,25H_{i,25}, and one scalar; H25,25=−HiiH_{25,25}=-H_{ii} removes the second scalar. The explicit covariant quotient on page 07 proves the representation assignment; agreement of dimensions alone would not prove it.

Similarly, level three forms a traceless symmetric rank-three tensor and an antisymmetric rank-two tensor of SO(25)SO(25), of dimensions 29002900 and 300300. The leading trajectory selects the maximal rotation eigenvalue in the symmetric traceless family, giving J=N=α′M2+1J=N=\alpha'M^2+1. A generic product of first-harmonic oscillators also contains lower-spin components and should not be identified wholesale with the leading trajectory.

Closed-string reconstruction and level matching

Section titled “Closed-string reconstruction and level matching”

The closed string has two independent transverse oscillator algebras: αni\alpha_n^i depends on σ+\sigma^+ and continues to the holomorphic sector, while α~ni\widetilde\alpha_n^i depends on σ−\sigma^- and continues to the antiholomorphic sector. In the light-cone gauge already constructed,

∂±X+=α′p+2,∂±X−=(∂±Xi)2α′p+.\partial_\pm X^+=\frac{\alpha'p^+}{2}, \qquad \partial_\pm X^-=\frac{(\partial_\pm X^i)^2}{\alpha'p^+}.

There is a global issue even after these local equations have been solved. A closed string in a noncompact X−X^- direction must return to the same X−X^- after σ→σ+2π\sigma\to\sigma+2\pi.

The average of the left chiral derivative is

⟨∂+X−⟩σ=α′pi2/4+N−ap+,\left\langle\partial_+X^-\right\rangle_\sigma =\frac{\alpha'p_i^2/4+N-a}{p^+},

where the brackets denote a spatial-period average, not a quantum expectation value. The right derivative has the same expression with N→N~N\to\widetilde N. This follows directly from ∂+Xi=α′/2∑nαnie−inσ+\partial_+X^i=\sqrt{\alpha'/2}\sum_n\alpha_n^i e^{-in\sigma^+} and its right-moving counterpart, including the normal-ordering constant in each chiral sector.

Since ∂σX−=∂+X−−∂−X−\partial_\sigma X^-=\partial_+X^- -\partial_-X^-, the reconstructed monodromy is

X−(τ,σ+2π)−X−(τ,σ)=2πp+(N−N~).X^-(\tau,\sigma+2\pi)-X^-(\tau,\sigma) =\frac{2\pi}{p^+}(N-\widetilde N).

Thus periodicity requires level matching:

N=N~.N=\widetilde N.

The same condition is the residual spatial-translation constraint. Indeed the reduced generator is

Pσ⊥=12πα′∫02πdσ X˙iX′i=N−N~.P_\sigma^\perp =\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\int_0^{2\pi}d\sigma\, \dot X^i X'^i =N-\widetilde N.

With our chirality assignment, i[Pσ⊥,Xi]=∂σXii[P_\sigma^\perp,X^i]=\partial_\sigma X^i. Physical closed-string states are invariant under this remaining gauge transformation.

The sum of the two averaged derivatives fixes the Hamiltonian:

α′p−=α′pi2/2+N+N~−2ap+.\alpha'p^-= \frac{\alpha'p_i^2/2+N+\widetilde N-2a}{p^+}.

Consequently

M2=2α′(N+N~−2a)=4α′(N−a),N=N~.M^2=\frac{2}{\alpha'}(N+\widetilde N-2a) =\frac4{\alpha'}(N-a), \qquad N=\widetilde N.

The nonzero reconstructed modes are

αn−=Ln⊥α′/2 p+,α~n−=L~n⊥α′/2 p+,n≠0.\alpha_n^-= \frac{L_n^\perp}{\sqrt{\alpha'/2}\,p^+}, \qquad \widetilde\alpha_n^-= \frac{\widetilde L_n^\perp}{\sqrt{\alpha'/2}\,p^+}, \qquad n\neq0.

The closed-string Lorentz test includes both chiral contributions and the level-matching condition; it gives the same critical values. The explicit boost calculation above was for the open string, so its open zero-mode normalization must not be inserted unchanged into a closed-string generator.

At a=1a=1, the closed vacuum has M2=−4/α′M^2=-4/\alpha'. The states at N=N~=1N=\widetilde N=1 are massless and span 24⊗2424\otimes24, which decomposes into 299+276+1299+276+1 polarizations. They correspond to the graviton, two-form and dilaton. Their physical transverse decomposition was derived on page 07. Here the new result is why only matched pairs of oscillator levels describe closed strings. Their rapidly growing degeneracies lead to the state-counting and Hagedorn analysis.

Exercise 1. A global gauge map and its failure

Section titled “Exercise 1. A global gauge map and its failure”

Let the open-string chiral coordinate be F(s)=F(0)+α′p+(s+ϵsin⁡s)F(s)=F(0)+\alpha'p^+(s+\epsilon\sin s), with p+≠0p^+\neq0. Construct the residual map, determine its regular orientation-preserving range, and verify that it preserves both strip boundaries. Explain why its nonzero average slope does not settle the question.

Solution

The construction in the text gives

f(s)=s+ϵsin⁡s,f′(s)=1+ϵcos⁡s,f(s+2π)=f(s)+2π.f(s)=s+\epsilon\sin s, \qquad f'(s)=1+\epsilon\cos s, \qquad f(s+2\pi)=f(s)+2\pi.

Strict positivity for all ss is equivalent to ∣ϵ∣<1|\epsilon|<1. At ∣ϵ∣=1|\epsilon|=1 the derivative vanishes at isolated points, so the inverse is not a regular diffeomorphism. For ∣ϵ∣>1|\epsilon|>1 it changes sign.

At σ=0\sigma=0, both arguments equal τ\tau, so σ′=0\sigma'=0. At σ=π\sigma=\pi, the arguments differ by 2π2\pi; hence

σ′=f(τ+π)−f(τ−π)2=π.\sigma'= \frac{f(\tau+\pi)-f(\tau-\pi)}2=\pi.

The new time is τ′=[f(σ+)+f(σ−)]/2\tau'=[f(\sigma^+)+f(\sigma^-)]/2, and X+=2F(0)+2α′p+τ′X^+=2F(0)+2\alpha'p^+\tau'. In every case the average of f′f' is one. This average fixes the monodromy but does not guarantee a regular inverse.

Exercise 2. Reconstruct the longitudinal harmonic

Section titled “Exercise 2. Reconstruct the longitudinal harmonic”

Consider a classical open string with one nonzero transverse coordinate

X1=Acos⁡(nτ)cos⁡(nσ),n∈Z>0,X^1=A\cos(n\tau)\cos(n\sigma), \qquad n\in\mathbb Z_{>0},

and X+=x++2α′p+τX^+=x^++2\alpha'p^+\tau. Find X−X^-, check its Neumann boundary condition, and compare its zero mode with the transverse oscillator energy. Here AA is a length and the classical intercept is zero.

Solution

The chiral derivatives are ∂±X1=−Ansin⁡(nσ±)/2\partial_\pm X^1=-An\sin(n\sigma^\pm)/2. The constraints give

∂±X−=A2n216α′p+[1−cos⁡(2nσ±)].\partial_\pm X^-= \frac{A^2n^2}{16\alpha'p^+} \left[1-\cos(2n\sigma^\pm)\right].

Integrating both chiral pieces yields

X−=x−+A2n28α′p+τ−A2n16α′p+sin⁡(2nτ)cos⁡(2nσ).X^-=x^-+ \frac{A^2n^2}{8\alpha'p^+}\tau -\frac{A^2n}{16\alpha'p^+} \sin(2n\tau)\cos(2n\sigma).

Its spatial derivative vanishes at σ=0,π\sigma=0,\pi. Substitution of the chiral derivatives into C±±=−2∂±X+∂±X−+(∂±X1)2C_{\pm\pm}=-2\partial_\pm X^+\partial_\pm X^-+(\partial_\pm X^1)^2 gives zero pointwise. The minus oscillation has twice the transverse frequency because the constraint is quadratic.

The coefficient of τ\tau is 2α′p−2\alpha'p^-, so

p−=A2n216α′2p+.p^- =\frac{A^2n^2}{16\alpha'^2p^+}.

From the open mode expansion,

αn1=−iAn22α′,α−n1=(αn1)∗,Ncl=A2n28α′.\alpha_n^1=-\frac{iAn}{2\sqrt{2\alpha'}}, \qquad \alpha_{-n}^1=(\alpha_n^1)^*, \qquad N_{\mathrm{cl}}=\frac{A^2n^2}{8\alpha'}.

There is no transverse center-of-mass momentum, and p−=Ncl/(2α′p+)p^-=N_{\mathrm{cl}}/(2\alpha'p^+) agrees with the reconstructed zero mode. Each term in X−X^- has dimension of length.

Exercise 3. Casimir energy on a strip and a circle

Section titled “Exercise 3. Casimir energy on a strip and a circle”

Put dd free transverse scalars on an auxiliary worldsheet strip of spatial length ℓ\ell with Neumann ends. Regulate their oscillator energies with e−δωne^{-\delta\omega_n}, where δ\delta is a length, and subtract the leading local divergence. Repeat for a circle of circumference ℓ\ell. Explain the relation to one versus two chiral intercepts.

Solution

On the strip the nonzero frequencies are ωn=πn/ℓ\omega_n=\pi n/\ell, with one real oscillator for each nn and each species. The zero mode has no oscillator zero-point energy. Therefore

Estrip(δ)=dπ2ℓ∑n>0ne−πδn/ℓ=dℓ2πδ2−dπ24ℓ+O(δ2/ℓ3).\begin{aligned} E_{\rm strip}(\delta) &=\frac{d\pi}{2\ell} \sum_{n>0}n e^{-\pi\delta n/\ell}\\ &=\frac{d\ell}{2\pi\delta^2} -\frac{d\pi}{24\ell}+O(\delta^2/\ell^3). \end{aligned}

The divergent term is proportional to the spatial length and is removed by a local vacuum-energy subtraction. The finite term is −dπ/(24ℓ)-d\pi/(24\ell). Measuring energy in units π/ℓ\pi/\ell gives −d/24-d/24.

On a circle there are two real oscillators at each ωn=2πn/ℓ\omega_n=2\pi n/\ell, or equivalently two chiral families. Thus

Ecircle(δ)=2πdℓ∑n>0ne−2πδn/ℓ=dℓ2πδ2−dπ6ℓ+O(δ2/ℓ3).\begin{aligned} E_{\rm circle}(\delta) &=\frac{2\pi d}{\ell} \sum_{n>0}n e^{-2\pi\delta n/\ell}\\ &=\frac{d\ell}{2\pi\delta^2} -\frac{d\pi}{6\ell}+O(\delta^2/\ell^3). \end{aligned}

The finite energy in units 2π/ℓ2\pi/\ell is −d/12=−2a-d/12=-2a, with a=d/24a=d/24 per chiral family. These are worldsheet Casimir energies, not target-space masses. Their relation to the latter also uses the zero-mode constraints.

Exercise 4. The longitudinal modes are composite operators

Section titled “Exercise 4. The longitudinal modes are composite operators”

Using αn−=(Ln⊥−aδn0)/q\alpha_n^-=(L_n^\perp-a\delta_{n0})/q, derive their commutators with transverse modes and with one another. Why would setting the minus-minus commutator to zero be incorrect?

Solution

The independent zero mode qq commutes with the transverse oscillator algebra. Therefore

[αm−,αni]=1q[Lm⊥,αni]=−nqαm+ni.[\alpha_m^-,\alpha_n^i] =\frac1q[L_m^\perp,\alpha_n^i] =-\frac n q\alpha_{m+n}^i.

For two longitudinal composites,

[αm−,αn−]=m−nqαm+n−+1q2[d12(m3−m)+2am]δm+n,0.\begin{aligned} [\alpha_m^-,\alpha_n^-] &=\frac{m-n}{q}\alpha_{m+n}^-\\ &\quad+\frac1{q^2} \left[\frac d{12}(m^3-m)+2am\right]\delta_{m+n,0}. \end{aligned}

In deriving the second line, rewrite Lm+n⊥=qαm+n−+aδm+n,0L_{m+n}^\perp=q\alpha_{m+n}^-+a\delta_{m+n,0}. Its intercept contribution is (m−n)aδm+n,0=2amδm+n,0(m-n)a\delta_{m+n,0}=2am\delta_{m+n,0}.

The unreduced covariant bracket [αm−,αn−]=mη−−δm+n,0=0[\alpha_m^-,\alpha_n^-]=m\eta^{--}\delta_{m+n,0}=0 refers to independent covariant coordinates before reduction. Here the constraints and gauge choice have changed the brackets to reduced ones, and αn−\alpha_n^- is a composite of independent transverse modes. Even its classical bracket is generally nonzero. The quantum central contribution adds to this distinction.

Exercise 5. Two explicit matrix elements of the anomaly

Section titled “Exercise 5. Two explicit matrix elements of the anomaly”

Take two different transverse species i,ji,j, set qi=0q_i=0, and use normalized states ∣n,j⟩norm=α−nj∣0⟩/n|n,j\rangle_{\rm norm}=\alpha_{-n}^j|0\rangle/\sqrt n. Evaluate the off-diagonal matrix element of q2[J−i,J−j]q^2[J^{-i},J^{-j}] for n=1,2n=1,2 directly from EiE^i and the orbital contribution. Determine which conditions they impose.

Solution

At level one the pair-creation sum in Ei∣1,j⟩E^i|1,j\rangle is empty, so EiE^i annihilates these states at qi=0q_i=0. The only contribution is −2ihSij-2ihS^{ij}. Since the normalized spin matrix element is −i-i, the answer is

norm⟨1,i∣q2[J−i,J−j]∣1,j⟩norm=2(a−1).{}_{\rm norm}\langle1,i| q^2[J^{-i},J^{-j}]|1,j\rangle_{\rm norm} =2(a-1).

At level two, write ur=α−1ru_r=\alpha_{-1}^r and ∣Q2⟩=12∑rur2∣0⟩|Q_2\rangle=\tfrac12\sum_r u_r^2|0\rangle. Then

Ei∣2,j⟩=i(2uiuj∣0⟩−δij∣Q2⟩).E^i|2,j\rangle =i\left(2u_i u_j|0\rangle-\delta^{ij}|Q_2\rangle\right).

For i≠ji\neq j, ⟨Q2∣Q2⟩=d/2\langle Q_2|Q_2\rangle=d/2, ⟨2ui2∣Q2⟩=2\langle2u_i^2|Q_2\rangle=2, and ∥2uiuj∣0⟩∥2=4\|2u_i u_j|0\rangle\|^2=4. The unnormalized matrix element of [Ei,Ej][E^i,E^j] is consequently d/2−8d/2-8. Dividing by the norm factor two gives d/4−4d/4-4.

The normalized spin matrix element is again −i-i, while h=2−ah=2-a. Adding the orbital contribution gives

norm⟨2,i∣q2[J−i,J−j]∣2,j⟩norm=d4+2a−8.{}_{\rm norm}\langle2,i| q^2[J^{-i},J^{-j}]|2,j\rangle_{\rm norm} =\frac d4+2a-8.

The first test requires a=1a=1, and then the second is (D−26)/4(D-26)/4. Thus D=26D=26. These matrix elements equal nAnn\mathcal A_n, not An\mathcal A_n, because AnijA_n^{ij} acts with a factor nn on normalized one-oscillator states. Two different transverse species were essential; with only one species this test does not exist.

Exercise 6. A closed string that fails to close longitudinally

Section titled “Exercise 6. A closed string that fails to close longitudinally”

Take the classical transverse configuration

X1=Acos⁡(mσ+),X2=Bcos⁡(nσ−),m,n∈Z>0,X^1=A\cos(m\sigma^+), \qquad X^2=B\cos(n\sigma^-), \qquad m,n\in\mathbb Z_{>0},

with other transverse coordinates constant and X+=x++α′p+τX^+=x^++\alpha'p^+\tau. Both transverse coordinates are periodic. Find the monodromy of X−X^- and the further condition for a closed embedding. Then consider a quantum state made only from mode-22 left oscillators and mode-33 right oscillators; find the smallest nonzero occupation numbers satisfying level matching and its critical mass.

Solution

The constraints give

∂+X−=A2m2sin⁡2(mσ+)α′p+,∂−X−=B2n2sin⁡2(nσ−)α′p+.\partial_+X^-= \frac{A^2m^2\sin^2(m\sigma^+)}{\alpha'p^+}, \qquad \partial_-X^-= \frac{B^2n^2\sin^2(n\sigma^-)}{\alpha'p^+}.

Their averages are A2m2/(2α′p+)A^2m^2/(2\alpha'p^+) and B2n2/(2α′p+)B^2n^2/(2\alpha'p^+). The minus coordinate therefore changes by

ΔX−=πα′p+(A2m2−B2n2)\Delta X^-= \frac{\pi}{\alpha'p^+}\left(A^2m^2-B^2n^2\right)

around the spatial circle. The embedding closes in noncompact target space only if A2m2=B2n2A^2m^2=B^2n^2. The classical levels are Ncl=A2m2/(2α′)N_{\rm cl}=A^2m^2/(2\alpha') and N~cl=B2n2/(2α′)\widetilde N_{\rm cl}=B^2n^2/(2\alpha'), so this agrees with the general monodromy formula at a=0a=0. Local constraints and periodic transverse coordinates alone were not sufficient.

In the quantum example, let rr and ss count left mode-22 and right mode-33 excitations. The levels are N=2rN=2r and N~=3s\widetilde N=3s. Their smallest positive common value is six, attained at r=3,s=2r=3,s=2. At a=1a=1,

M2=4α′(6−1)=20α′.M^2=\frac4{\alpha'}(6-1)=\frac{20}{\alpha'}.

Equal numbers of quanta would have been the wrong condition: it is the frequency-weighted levels that must match.

  • Klaus Bering, “A Note on Angular Momentum Commutators in Light-Cone Formulation of Open Bosonic String Theory,” 2011, revised 2012, arXiv:1104.4446. Sections 6–8 give a direct ordered-operator calculation of the boost commutator.
  • Peter Goddard, Jeffrey Goldstone, Claudio Rebbi and Charles B. Thorn, “Quantum Dynamics of a Massless Relativistic String,” Nuclear Physics B 56 (1973), 109–135. DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90223-X.
  • Luca Mezincescu and Paul K. Townsend, “Anyons from Strings,” Physical Review Letters 105 (2010), 191601. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.191601; arXiv:1008.2334. The discussion after equations (22)–(23) explains why the dangerous commutator is absent in three dimensions.
  • David Tong, Lectures on String Theory, University of Cambridge, 2009, arXiv:0908.0333, section 2.4, especially the quantum Lorentz algebra and transverse spectrum.